Documents

Oral argument — People ex rel. Madigan v. Lincoln, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2016

They have control over the waste that is sitting on their land and they have failed to clean it up. That in itself is a violation because it is allowing open dumping under the Act. … Thank you for your comments. Ms. Wunder, brief rebuttal. There's a lot I'd like to respond to and I'll try to get through the points. Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Alan Butler

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2014

This wasn't just clean up and pounding nails, this was using his own construction equipment, building walls, digging trenches to perform valiant acts subcontracts and the district court said a couple of … he did not have Valiant Act pay himself a pay Mr.

Oral argument — NA of Mftr v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2023

And I would just say that the same length comment period was used for the targeted policy changes affirmed by this court in clean water action by the D.C. … And even if you're not sure about the adequacy of the notice and comment period, plaintiffs have barely even tried to meet their burden to show that they were harmed in any way by this comment period.

Oral argument — United States v. Orestes Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2024

Because that seems to be the period with which we're talking about. … As judge Lux says, the words are in the air. So why isn't that explanation of imposition likewise binding here?

Oral argument — Texas Workforce Commission v. United States Dept o

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

The food handling is no more essential to it than making sure that the pot in which you cook is clean or the tables are clean. … It was that clean. Even with that, he basically said, well, I'm not worried about that.

Oral argument — Pekin Insurance Co. v. Centex Homes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2016

Sounds to me this is the second fight in the air, but with CSR. Right. Well, I… How many fights do you want on this issue? I don't know. … Counsel, one parting comment I'd like to make. In your brief, you cited Pekin v. Hawk, which is a Rule 23. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Sierra Club v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2022

period. … And after Mountain Valley claimed that it would clean up its act.

Oral argument — Immunocept v. Fulbright & Jaworski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2007

Was there no call for supplemental briefing to address jurisdiction once this case was identified to be listed as a related case and heard by the same panel as the air measurement? … In terms of scope of employment, he made two comments. One of them was that it doesn't matter. He said, we have two orders, one from the sermon judgment and one on the oath of denial motion.

Oral argument — Env TX Citizen Lobby v. ExxonMobil

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2022

Those injuries were essentially constant throughout the period. As this court found at least one plaintiff was present and complaining about impacts throughout the eight year period. … Whatever you think of article three, whatever you think about the causal nexus that is required between a data violation and a concrete and particular injury, the language of the Clean Air Act is unambiguous

Oral argument — People v. Carrizalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2012

And the judge, by his comments, made clear that there was nothing else going on. He found out from Ms. … Why not give the defendant a clean, fair opportunity in a new trial? That's his argument.

Oral argument — Duane Jensen v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2009

That would be- I gave you a clean hypo, and I'm asking you- I think that that would be a similar approach as to what we're dealing with here. … One of the points on appeal that the judge aired by striking them? Exactly. And part of it is because it goes to show the retaliatory conduct.

Oral argument — United States v. Pitt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

Pitt, who was a previously convicted felon, went to Florida to clean his father's house out and bring the belongings back to Massachusetts. Included in those belongings were firearms. … Now, finally, turning to the ACCA claim, we are here on plain-air review.

Oral argument — Internation Customs Products v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2006

Those protections include that we get notice, we have an opportunity for comment, and we have a grace period of 60 days if there's going to be a revocation or modification of that ruling. … period.

Oral argument — G.B. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2026

I mean, it's your reliance is these are these are harms that are going to materialize, you know, some sooner than later, but over a period of time. … I don't have the dollar threshold at the tip of my tongue, but yes, it's only for significant regulatory… But many EPA Clean Air Act actions are significant regulatory actions, for sure.

Oral argument — Safe Zone Services v. Linn-Mathes Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2026

Plaintiff also does not argue that the trial court aired in entering summary judgment as it pertains to the October city of Highwood check again, even in the reply and nothing today. … The undisputed record says no. 404 a requires impersonation of identity and not merely acting without authority. Rivera acted in his own name at all times.

Oral argument — United States v. Vassily Thompson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2020

That is true, and that's why we're under a plain air status. … It was a very clean case where one person got everything and one person got nothing. Here, the district court did exactly what Honeycutt mandated.

Oral argument — EBRON v. GONZALES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2006

Well, Your Honor, let me, since I wasn't part of the mediation, I can actually comment on Homeland Security's position. The position in this case is Mr. … Well, do you agree that he's been clean of heroin for six years? Well, I agree he's been clean at least three years, Your Honor, because he's been in ICE. Has he been in custody?

Oral argument — Jarrod Johnson v. Water, Light, and Sinking Fund Commission of City of Dalton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2022

So I certainly, you know, the Court could have left the third amended complaint in place and ruled, for example, on summary judgment on our Clean Water Act claim or on any of the other claims raised by … The amended claim just added claims to new allegations in the Clean Water Act and left the nuisance claim untouched. So I think the district court and this court coexist quite cleanly here.

Oral argument — Jorge Rosales v. Bellagio, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2020

But most, there was a listing of side work that was light work, too, like cleaning the beverage area. I would just be cleaning, cleaning the beverage area, nothing to do with heavy lifting. … If you're not acting in good faith, there's a question of fact that will preclude summary judgment, and that's exactly what we have in this case.

Oral argument — Toya Crain v. Denis McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2023

They cleaned the hospital, and in the acting chief position, she was a GS-12. … There's the improperly advised a candidate evidence, then there's evidence with regard to the profanity, the cleaning solutions, the failure to complete the probationary period, then the handling of the