Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Si

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2017

I'd just like to focus on even if the record is not absolutely certain that she was acting on a mistake about his record, if there's confusion or if there's reason to believe that she may have been acting … And his record, he had long periods, seven- and eight-year periods with no criminal activity. This man is . . . he's a depressed man.

Oral argument — Village of Bolingbrook v. Illinois American Water Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

And voluntary and involuntary dismissal are fundamentally different in this context because the one is part of the inherent authority of the court to make sure that its docket is clean of orders that are … of limitations by filing a nullity in the circuit court and then voluntarily dismissing it and using that to bootstrap a case back later into the circuit court saying, well, I'm within the limitations period

Oral argument — In re: LA Pub Svc Comm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022

Are there any hard and fast dates or day periods? Well, there's the 180-day explanation period under 206 if they've delayed for more than 180 days in a final decision. … Well, I think ordering FERC to act in a certain time period in the return on equity proceeding would risk that FERC would not, at the end of the day, get it right, and it would be counterproductive because

Oral argument — John Snow v. E.K. McDaniel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2015

No one could convince him to act or say or do differently. A lot of different things were tried with Mr. Kavanaugh in order to get him to take And that case was settled as well. … And that was going to be my opening comments, Your Honor. Now, we had a jury trial. The system worked.

Oral argument — Miller v. Fertility Centers of Illinois

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025

But in CASMRS Act, the Court was struggling with whether an embryo was a human being. … I know here we have the Illinois Marriage Dissolution of Marriage Act.

Oral argument — Linda Harrell v. Delaware North Companies

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2015

Delaware North, over a period of time, was trying to determine how best to deal with this circumstance. … They wanted to determine whether they had done the right thing, whether they had acted in a way that was proper within the meaning of the law, whether they had acted in terms of the investigations, in

Oral argument — United States v. Carlos Serrano

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2010

Because all of these things were steps toward the ultimate fraudulent act. … So for what period of time did the jury deliberate according to your calculation? Part of one afternoon and a portion of the next day. That's all.

Oral argument — Stewart v. Woodford

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2008

And he knew that this thing by Solvang was a bunch of air. Two responses, Your Honor, first. But to suggest that the only possible reason is the one that you're suggesting is not true. … So maybe Solvang was involved, but clearly that first statement would have shown that the defendant acted out on Solvang's suggestions.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Courtois

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2014

So I would suggest if we just pick a number out of the air, either number, whether we go high or whether we go high or low, is conjecture. It is speculation. On top of that, as long as... … She could do that and I think Justice Carter's comments there about the new law coming into effect, I don't know what that number is.

Oral argument — Powell v. Weiss

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2014

So this is the holding, and then I just want you to comment on it. … So if you're not familiar with it, can I give you enough for you to comment?

Oral argument — Chad Langford v. Hector Joyner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2023

Was that the day that they didn't act fast? I mean, it seemed like to me they acted pretty fast the last day. Which day do you think that . . . … I think my superiors at the department would appreciate me refraining from comment on Bivens.

Oral argument — United States v. Felipe Medina-Navejar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

Further, this court has noted that closing argument is a crucial period at the time of – it's a crucial period in terms of whether something is prejudicial. … Your Honor, the prosecutor did not say he didn't act surprised. She never used the word surprised. She never used the word demeanor. She did not say how did the defendant act.

Oral argument — Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2012

I just have one other quick comment from my other colleague's comment. … So they don't actually take anything from you, but they sweep the place clean and get such DNA as you shed in skin cells or hair follicles or the like and store that.

Oral argument — LaShondra Davis v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2017

First, it is undisputed that an abuse of discretion standard of review applies and that HEDNA was operating under an apparent conflict of interest because it was acting as both the insurer and the claims … Cheatham's comments to the peer-reviewed physician.

Oral argument — People v. Isaacs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2017

I'd like to focus my comments this morning on the issues raised in Arguments 1 and 2 of the briefs. … Can you comment as to what the record demonstrates?

Oral argument — Yegiazaryan v. Smagin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2023

Two balls in the air for you. Okay, I'll try to remember them. … Could you comment on the comedy question that was posed to Mr. Levy?

Oral argument — OFI Asset Management v. Cooper Tireand Rubber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2016

You know, the plaintiffs act like it doesn't matter whether the thing that they should, that they say should have been said even was true or not. … That's something that was, uh, uh, up in the air. You had, you had problems and they were ongoing problems, but, uh, they thought we can get it done. We can get it done.

Oral argument — United States v. Yaroslav Churuk

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2019

There were, I believe, two or three... actually, I believe four acts that were alleged in the indictment that would suggest that a continuation of the conspiracy into the limitations period. … There's 79 overt acts alleged in the conspiracy, five of which are alleged to have occurred after March of 2005, the limitation period. Four of those derived from Nadia Yashuk, four.

Oral argument — Chin v. Carey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2005

Even any stray comments of the kind we usually get in these cases? No. There's no testimony to that. … I think at that time, or during the relevant time period, it fell under his umbrella.

Oral argument — People v. Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2014

And I will also get into the comments of Representative Mendoza. And as I discussed with Mr. … Well, one of the arguments we set forth in our brief was that it was invited air.