Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.61s

  • Oral argument — Wanda Johnson v. Johannes Mehserle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2012

    On several other occasions within a very short period of time, within several days, he made the same statements to other police officers. … Grant's left hand was up in the air, his left shoulder was up off the ground because he was starting to roll onto his right shoulder when the shot went off.

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Elaine Murphy v. William Sloan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2014

    That's the settlement agreement. 136 and 146 are the California State Family Law Act forms for income and expense declaration information. … And that's an excellent point, and it ties in with Judge Clifton's comment about Enbank and Chief Judge Kuczynski's comment about the same thing. This court perhaps can limit Moses to sabbaticals.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Vanessa Haldeman v. Ruth Golden

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2009

    Remember that an allegation in the air or the hearsay testimony of a supposed victim doesn't rise to the level of probable cause. … Several days later, Vanessa acted out sexually again.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — William Martin v. Mauricio Duran

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

    There here, there was no punch, and there was no intent to commit any act here. … Lett has no opportunity to address it in his comments to us. But you've made the argument in the brief that the district court erred on the clearly established prong as well.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Applications in Internet Time v. RPX Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

    And that if you just look at those facts alone, along with the public statements made by RPX about, you know, acting on behalf of its members and acting as an extension of the in-house legal department … There were comments asking the PTO to establish a regulation or a rule defining what those terms mean, and the PTO did not do so. Instead, it just created a guide, right?

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Melendez-Perez (Rosalio Melend

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2024

    So it's a small act, granted. But an act that fails in light of the fact that they didn't succeed on those two. … If the person is being resentenced now as opposed to then, there may be evidence of rehabilitation in the period between then and now.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — IN RE: IBM ARBITRATION AGREEMENT LITIGATION

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2023

    It says you have to file within the time period in which you're required to file. If the claim is dependent on filing a claim with an administrative agency, you have to file within that time period. … And the other sort of fundamental disconnect in plaintiff's argument is piggybacking isn't timeliness in the air. It doesn't eliminate. I'm sorry.

    64 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shavonda Hawkins v. AdvancePierre Foods

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

    Well, where the Federal Government hasn't acted. Exactly. Exactly. So, for example, let's put it into the context of this case. Ms. … There was a comment saying that you can't take it off the list until, or you can't deem it not grass until you find it unsafe, and the FDA said no.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Doe v. Planned Parenthood

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2025

    But the courts said they were not disqualified for a period of time at least. … The whole point of the False Claims Act, on which the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act is based, is to ensure that those who seek money from the public fisc act with scrupulous regard for the requirements

    67 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Emerald Coal Resources v. Ronald M.Hoy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2015

    First of all, the inspections on September 22, 2011, under the 103G, weren't about the time period that Hoy and Franks said the violations occurred. … They acted how Congress and the Mine Act would expect them to act.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ronald Hooks v. Kitsap Tenant Support Services

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015

    I believe there were comments by Senator Byrd that followed Senator Thompson's comments that support the version that we said, and they are cited in our brief. But I go back to... … Because if Senate hasn't confirmed them within that period of time and aren't going to do that, then...

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hauk v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

    So then really that comment is sort of a make-nice comment because really the contention is that your contention on the TILA claim is that the language is clear and the was means was, and so it could be … They rely upon a comment by the Federal Reserve Board under 226.6A2, and that comment specifically says that Chase must disclose, the creditor must disclose the specific event that may result in the increased

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — WARRIOR SPORTS v. DICKINSON WRIGHT

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2010

    Code and the Code of Federal Regulations of the time periods of when it can be reinstated, what a petitioner needs to show as far as why that payment wasn't done and the unavoidable delay standard and … And I think that that's what this court said in the air measurement case. I think that's correct.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bryan v. McDonald

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

    If you're now telling us that this came out of whole cloth or thin air or whatever, that's quite a new concept and quite a dramatic one. … The evidence from that time period shows only that there was dental trauma and teeth loss.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Serenity Investments, LLC v. Sun Hung Kai Strategic Capital, Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2026

    And if you look at that period of time, the ORIC firm had nothing to do with that period of time. Didn't do anything, wasn't asked to do anything, didn't fail to act. … No, Your Honor, because the acts of conversion is the 2021-2022 period. There was no acts by SHK to assume control over the shares in 2017. They were just sent to them.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Terrance Shaw

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2021

    The judge here was sort of referring to something he viewed as a highly reprehensible act, which is a way that Merriam-Webster defines sin. … And I think also, just as one final point on the Tapia era, there's very little daylight between the court's comments here and the court's comments in Burroughs, where they specifically contrasted the

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Americredit Financial Services v. Marlene Penrod

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

    And that State law is Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code and State Retail Installment Sales Acts. … It would be outside the 910-day period.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 1-19-0820

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021

    He didn't fire into the air to scare these people off. The evidence also shows and the videos apparently established that after the first bullet was fired, everybody scattered. … The trial court made a comment about the fact that he had to find that factor in order to determine that this was a second degree murder conviction.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — MillerCoors LLC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2020

    So in light of all that Judge Conley made the determination that the packaging is comparative and I think judged under the clear air standard that clearly has to be affirmed. … But why would that differ from the Lanham Act? Something untrue about my product I think does give rise to that presumption. Why would that differ from the Lanham Act context?

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joseph Wood, III v. Charles Ryan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2014

    of Information Act. … Not in the air. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you, counsel. Just a few quick points in rebuttal. Judge Thomas, you asked about the record.

    39 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.