Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.31s

  • Oral argument — Apple Inc. v. Squires

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2026

    They can open up a new comment period or amend the proposed rules and then have a new rule package. … or the new rule where the comment period has just closed, let's remember the PTO is not the only organ of the executive branch here.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Paul A. Cimino v. International Business Machin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020

    This is a False Claims Act case at the pleading stage. … Singh did, which is that this is a False Claims Act at the pleading stage.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wyeth K Kappos

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2009

    It wasn't among the comments that were generated during that rulemaking. … And there's nothing in the statutory provision itself, the 154B3A provision, that requires notice and comment rulemaking. This is an interpretive rule.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wong v. Midwest Gaming & Entertainment, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2023

    Wong complains was largely comments, flirtatious comments, and a couple of hugs. Prior to July 16th, Rivers had no reason to know, after Ms. … the act.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Parrish v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2025

    But there was another appeal period. … of Congress, the Rules Enabling Act.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mike Kreidler v. Danny Pixler

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2012

    Well, let me comment on several of the things you said about you. A couple of minutes ago, you mentioned that Mrs. … They moved for summary judgment and the judge denied it, so it's still up in the air at that point.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hyosung TNS Inc. v. ITC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

    At least for that time period. It could seek to do so. … Just don't act on it and the parties decide not to. Well, you know, they just don't act on it here with respect to the enforcement proceeding.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — NSK LTD v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007

    Is that an official position of Commerce that it can't act retroactively unless it acts under Section 129? … Well, it is Commerce's position that when it is implementing an adverse WTO report, it has to- Commerce's position is that it would be acting unlawfully if it didn't act under 129.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 84Partners, LLC v. General Dynamics Electric Boat

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2022

    That was the subject of a False Claims Act case. … Like, she sort of knows that the fraud is consistent throughout the whole period.

    59 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Single Story House

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2012

    Well, first of all, as noted in the state's reply brief, you never even get to what a legislature may have said during comments on the floor unless the language of the statute is not clear. … I think one of the things that the trial court aired in here is that he said that the term thing could be construed to mean anything, basically, is what he said. But that's not what the statute says.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Thomas Dare Arbogast

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2013

    In the state court, fraudulent transfer statute, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, comment six, does talk about necessities. Right. And somehow Judge Wettick used the word luxuries instead. … Burden of proof, Your Honor, we agree with the finding that Judge Markovitz had with regard to his looking at Comment 6 of Section 5102 of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.

    74 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Encinas v. Tucson Electric

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2003

    Did your client complain about the comments or anything like that? Not about the comments. … These were co-worker comments, right? These were co-worker comments, right. Not supervisor comments. Right, right.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Didomenico v. No. American Construction Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2004

    It was an Air Force base. It's a public work of improvement. It falls outside the scope of any of the California statutes. … One last comment.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Villoldo v. Castro Ruz

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2016

    And sometimes one of the comments was, why should we not look at it in a real-world application? … Senator Harkin in his comments said that this can't be the case. That's not what we want to do.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Roy West v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2026

    In fact, in analyzing the fourth prong of plain error review, the Supreme Court commented that it would, the real injustice would be to allow the defendants to be sentenced as if they were not distributing … Plain air. What did I say? Plain view. Oh, I'm sorry. I get all my search and seizure and all this other stuff all seems to come together at the same time.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Smith v. Mahoney

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2009

    That's why I pulled Nebraska out of thin air. But not only Nebraska. … Smith told him was, I was not drunk or not to the extent that it affected the way I acted. Did Mr. Dorn reasonably rely upon that statement?

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wanda Johnson v. Johannes Mehserle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2012

    On several other occasions within a very short period of time, within several days, he made the same statements to other police officers. … Grant's left hand was up in the air, his left shoulder was up off the ground because he was starting to roll onto his right shoulder when the shot went off.

    62 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Elaine Murphy v. William Sloan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2014

    That's the settlement agreement. 136 and 146 are the California State Family Law Act forms for income and expense declaration information. … And that's an excellent point, and it ties in with Judge Clifton's comment about Enbank and Chief Judge Kuczynski's comment about the same thing. This court perhaps can limit Moses to sabbaticals.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Vanessa Haldeman v. Ruth Golden

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2009

    Remember that an allegation in the air or the hearsay testimony of a supposed victim doesn't rise to the level of probable cause. … Several days later, Vanessa acted out sexually again.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — William Martin v. Mauricio Duran

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

    There here, there was no punch, and there was no intent to commit any act here. … Lett has no opportunity to address it in his comments to us. But you've made the argument in the brief that the district court erred on the clearly established prong as well.

    34 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.