Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.15s
Oral argument — Miller v. Fertility Centers of Illinois
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025
But in CASMRS Act, the Court was struggling with whether an embryo was a human being. … I know here we have the Illinois Marriage Dissolution of Marriage Act.
51 min of audioOral argument — P.J. v. Education
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2019
First, I'd like to comment, I'm going to get to this later, but I'd like to comment on the fact that no compensation should be made for the five through eight year period. … This put us in a position where we had to act, it seems to me, we had a duty to do something.
35 min of audioOral argument — Ronald Hooks v. Kitsap Tenant Support Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015
I believe there were comments by Senator Byrd that followed Senator Thompson's comments that support the version that we said, and they are cited in our brief. But I go back to... … Because if Senate hasn't confirmed them within that period of time and aren't going to do that, then...
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Carlos Serrano
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2010
Because all of these things were steps toward the ultimate fraudulent act. … So for what period of time did the jury deliberate according to your calculation? Part of one afternoon and a portion of the next day. That's all.
33 min of audioOral argument — Stewart v. Woodford
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2008
And he knew that this thing by Solvang was a bunch of air. Two responses, Your Honor, first. But to suggest that the only possible reason is the one that you're suggesting is not true. … So maybe Solvang was involved, but clearly that first statement would have shown that the defendant acted out on Solvang's suggestions.
38 min of audioOral argument — State of Texas v. Charles Kleinert
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016
So then are we reviewing the findings of fact for clear air only? Is that your position? … That's his authorization to act. Well, let's say the task force MOU said you will not be a member of this task force or acting under color of the task force if you use a gun, period.
53 min of audioOral argument — Hochhalter v. Stephens Group, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2008
First of all, back on the family leave act retaliation. … So there was a period of time in there that we actually have concrete damages that we can calculate for that time period. Okay.
38 min of audioOral argument — US Sportsmens Alliance Fdn v. CDC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025
I mean, that's the purpose of the comment, period, for them to understand whether the rule is valid or not. … Are you saying the rationale changed during the notice and comment period, but before the final regulation was issued?
35 min of audioOral argument — Estate of Katherine Monica Vickers v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026
So is your argument then that there continued to be a confidential relationship during this time period when the daughter was basically calling to report what was going on with her mother? … We mentioned jurisdiction specifically in the reply, and then in our opening brief, we argued that it was air for the district court to go further beyond resolving the statute of limitations claim or the
38 min of audioOral argument — CFE Racing Products v. BMF Wheels
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2015
He awarded statutory damages $250 under the Act. … So recognize the Act applies, but the plain text of the Act says you're entitled to actual damages or $250, so one of those two things, together with reasonable attorney's fees.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Vazquez-Rijos
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023
All persons having any business before this honorable court may go on air, give their attendance, and they shall be heard. God save the United States of America and this honorable court. … Can you do the elated comment? Just walk me through that one.
116 min of audioOral argument — Contemporary Cars, Inc. v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2015
I want to also explain that there will be a second or two delay, so I'm very hopeful that I won't be stepping over the lawyers' comments and my two brothers' comments. … their rights merely because their comments are intemperate or rude.
47 min of audioOral argument — Safeworks Illinois Occupational Health Services v. St. Mary's Hospital
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2011
There was some evidence showing that they failed to act upon it. I think the court used the term waiver, but I don't think that's accurate. … Two, as for a period of time when these employees were not employed, there is no such period.
47 min of audioOral argument — Benitez-Pinot v. Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022
So what do do you have any comment on that? Well, it's okay if you don't. … That's correct, Your Honor, that he did not act...
33 min of audioOral argument — In re: LA Pub Svc Comm
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022
Are there any hard and fast dates or day periods? Well, there's the 180-day explanation period under 206 if they've delayed for more than 180 days in a final decision. … Well, I think ordering FERC to act in a certain time period in the return on equity proceeding would risk that FERC would not, at the end of the day, get it right, and it would be counterproductive because
47 min of audioOral argument — Gordie Taylor v. Village of Dolton, Illinois
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017
The only issue the district court raised in dismissing that claim was that there were no overt acts of racial hostility within the 300-day limitations period, and thus his claim was untimely. … You look at the gestalt, I guess you could say, and if you can find that the non-overt acts of racism are part and parcel of the overt acts, even if there is no overt acts within the 300-day period, there
11 min of audioOral argument — People v. Thomas
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015
So at most you have a period of time from 1.57 a.m. to 2.12 a.m. when according to Sophia, what they do in that period of time is walk the rest of the way to her parents' house, they sit on the porch, … That certainly wouldn't take a long period of time.
41 min of audioOral argument — Chad Langford v. Hector Joyner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2023
Was that the day that they didn't act fast? I mean, it seemed like to me they acted pretty fast the last day. Which day do you think that . . . … I think my superiors at the department would appreciate me refraining from comment on Bivens.
39 min of audioOral argument — Eurofins Pharma USHoldingsvs.Bioalliance Pharma SA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2010
To a certain degree, this panel is writing on a clean slate on this one particular issue. … It would be the act in Delaware.
51 min of audioOral argument — Janay Garrick v. Moody Bible Institute
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2023
Cohen is for clean questions separate from the merits that are pure questions of law. Because all of the stuff that we're talking about, this is district court litigation. … Just period. That's off the table.
44 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.