Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.15s

  • Oral argument — Miller v. Fertility Centers of Illinois

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025

    But in CASMRS Act, the Court was struggling with whether an embryo was a human being. … I know here we have the Illinois Marriage Dissolution of Marriage Act.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — P.J. v. Education

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2019

    First, I'd like to comment, I'm going to get to this later, but I'd like to comment on the fact that no compensation should be made for the five through eight year period. … This put us in a position where we had to act, it seems to me, we had a duty to do something.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ronald Hooks v. Kitsap Tenant Support Services

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015

    I believe there were comments by Senator Byrd that followed Senator Thompson's comments that support the version that we said, and they are cited in our brief. But I go back to... … Because if Senate hasn't confirmed them within that period of time and aren't going to do that, then...

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Carlos Serrano

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2010

    Because all of these things were steps toward the ultimate fraudulent act. … So for what period of time did the jury deliberate according to your calculation? Part of one afternoon and a portion of the next day. That's all.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stewart v. Woodford

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2008

    And he knew that this thing by Solvang was a bunch of air. Two responses, Your Honor, first. But to suggest that the only possible reason is the one that you're suggesting is not true. … So maybe Solvang was involved, but clearly that first statement would have shown that the defendant acted out on Solvang's suggestions.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of Texas v. Charles Kleinert

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

    So then are we reviewing the findings of fact for clear air only? Is that your position? … That's his authorization to act. Well, let's say the task force MOU said you will not be a member of this task force or acting under color of the task force if you use a gun, period.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hochhalter v. Stephens Group, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2008

    First of all, back on the family leave act retaliation. … So there was a period of time in there that we actually have concrete damages that we can calculate for that time period. Okay.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — US Sportsmens Alliance Fdn v. CDC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

    I mean, that's the purpose of the comment, period, for them to understand whether the rule is valid or not. … Are you saying the rationale changed during the notice and comment period, but before the final regulation was issued?

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Estate of Katherine Monica Vickers v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026

    So is your argument then that there continued to be a confidential relationship during this time period when the daughter was basically calling to report what was going on with her mother? … We mentioned jurisdiction specifically in the reply, and then in our opening brief, we argued that it was air for the district court to go further beyond resolving the statute of limitations claim or the

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — CFE Racing Products v. BMF Wheels

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2015

    He awarded statutory damages $250 under the Act. … So recognize the Act applies, but the plain text of the Act says you're entitled to actual damages or $250, so one of those two things, together with reasonable attorney's fees.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Vazquez-Rijos

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

    All persons having any business before this honorable court may go on air, give their attendance, and they shall be heard. God save the United States of America and this honorable court. … Can you do the elated comment? Just walk me through that one.

    116 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Contemporary Cars, Inc. v. NLRB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2015

    I want to also explain that there will be a second or two delay, so I'm very hopeful that I won't be stepping over the lawyers' comments and my two brothers' comments. … their rights merely because their comments are intemperate or rude.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Safeworks Illinois Occupational Health Services v. St. Mary's Hospital

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2011

    There was some evidence showing that they failed to act upon it. I think the court used the term waiver, but I don't think that's accurate. … Two, as for a period of time when these employees were not employed, there is no such period.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Benitez-Pinot v. Garland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

    So what do do you have any comment on that? Well, it's okay if you don't. … That's correct, Your Honor, that he did not act...

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: LA Pub Svc Comm

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2022

    Are there any hard and fast dates or day periods? Well, there's the 180-day explanation period under 206 if they've delayed for more than 180 days in a final decision. … Well, I think ordering FERC to act in a certain time period in the return on equity proceeding would risk that FERC would not, at the end of the day, get it right, and it would be counterproductive because

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gordie Taylor v. Village of Dolton, Illinois

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

    The only issue the district court raised in dismissing that claim was that there were no overt acts of racial hostility within the 300-day limitations period, and thus his claim was untimely. … You look at the gestalt, I guess you could say, and if you can find that the non-overt acts of racism are part and parcel of the overt acts, even if there is no overt acts within the 300-day period, there

    11 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Thomas

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015

    So at most you have a period of time from 1.57 a.m. to 2.12 a.m. when according to Sophia, what they do in that period of time is walk the rest of the way to her parents' house, they sit on the porch, … That certainly wouldn't take a long period of time.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Chad Langford v. Hector Joyner

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2023

    Was that the day that they didn't act fast? I mean, it seemed like to me they acted pretty fast the last day. Which day do you think that . . . … I think my superiors at the department would appreciate me refraining from comment on Bivens.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Eurofins Pharma USHoldingsvs.Bioalliance Pharma SA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2010

    To a certain degree, this panel is writing on a clean slate on this one particular issue. … It would be the act in Delaware.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Janay Garrick v. Moody Bible Institute

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2023

    Cohen is for clean questions separate from the merits that are pure questions of law. Because all of the stuff that we're talking about, this is district court litigation. … Just period. That's off the table.

    44 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.