Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Oral argument — United States v. Fa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2016
This record is replete with comments that go toward an attitude by the district court that simply suggests a lack of belief of anything that's said, including to counsel. … Shen acted contumaciously. Mr. Paulson was not part of the case at the time.
17 min of audioOral argument — In Interest of N.M. & M.M., Minors
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2011
And I use a time period. I break this up into two time periods, March 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008, because that's when the respondent was arrested. … So the trial court did not specifically comment on it. So for the defendant to characterize the trial court did not find is not necessarily true. The trial court simply did not comment on it.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ninete
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2005
It doesn't say he did the overt acts, but it says that from 1997 to 2002 that he did, that he was a part of the conspiracy in doing those overt acts. … At the air cargo terminal, you have to have your supervisor at least on board. It helps if you have other members of the shift on board. The fact that when Mrs.
33 min of audioOral argument — Gilster-Mary Lee Corp. v. Workers' Coompensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2017
And in Tolbert, they extended the time period, basically saying there is absolutely no way that Mr. … known that he had histoplasmosis before October 4th, which is when they did the biopsy, so we have hearing loss cases and other occupational disease cases, like pneumoconiosis, no one knows when that air
29 min of audioOral argument — Michael Koziara v. BNSF Railway Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2016
The Federal Railroad Safety Act, with regard to the legal standard, prohibits discrimination based on protected activity. … I'm simply contending that under the theory, the chain of events theory of liability, under contributing factor in the Air 21 framework, Judge Peterson correctly ruled in our favor on summary judgment.
30 min of audioOral argument — Bardhan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026
We had a complaint with the correct affidavit of airship and airs, and were set to proceed to trial, and were ready to go. … Do you want to comment on that part? It culminated with a motion in limine.
64 min of audioOral argument — Indirect Purchaser Class v. Conner Erwin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2019
We aren't asking this court to adjust or step outside its traditional fee analysis, but $42 million from the class comment fund instead of $22 million promised is on its face unreasonable. … And, again, that's where he says, I think he makes a finding that cleans all this up to the extent he needed to. I appreciate that.
43 min of audioOral argument — Sami Ammari v. City of Los Angeles
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2016
And I would join in the comments that were made by counsel. Is there someone from the City of Los Angeles? I think she's over there. Is she going to speak also? … Town of Gilbert, innocent motives do not justify an enactment that still acts on a content basis. And one of the concerns the Supreme Court expresses in Reed v.
44 min of audioOral argument — Goodrich v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2021
So you better argue, don't act like I have any kind of latent insight about Youssef Rooks. When I left the Bar Exam, I'm like, I will never see Youssef Rooks again. … The government argues, hey, this treatise favorably comments on the judge's treatment here. What say you? The treatise is not uniform.
38 min of audioOral argument — Theresa Ela v. Kathleen Destefano
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2017
This case involves two issues and first impression under the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, the DPPA. … I mean, I can understand why the appellant wants to create out of thin air a use or disclosure of this information, but that was not the evidence. But what's the answer to that question?
32 min of audioOral argument — NRDC v. Michael Regan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2023
Okay, so let's take the air. First of all, there's there's two sets of notice and comment rulemaking and judicial right over the initial determination. … Your Honor, the agency put those levels out for public comment.
60 min of audioOral argument — Anatolie Stati v. Republic of Kazakhstan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 28, 2018
There was a mailing, and the mailing said, file an answer, and the answer should contain comments on two things. … There's a comparable provision, believe it or not, in federal contracting law under the statute called the Miller Act.
29 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2018
That is not necessarily so, because sometimes the panel may say, well, you know, you brought all this stuff up, you know, clean it up, we're not gonna... … But you're acting as if. What we're doing is comparing the price of the same mail next year.
92 min of audioOral argument — Qin v. Vertex Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024
Harder, and they were all subject to the same 2018 performance evaluation period. … Hart was discriminatory or actually acting on stereotypes at the time that he made the comments, but that actually he was able to tell HR the reasons why he felt that Mr.
74 min of audioOral argument — Billings Clinic v. Eric Hargan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2017
Hargan Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Mr. Collins for the appellants, Ms. Foster for the appellee Ms. … Costs divided by charges from the same fiscal period. But the Secretary's model used charge data from the most recent period and paired that up with cost data from four earlier fiscal periods.
51 min of audioOral argument — Apple Inc. v. Squires
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2026
They can open up a new comment period or amend the proposed rules and then have a new rule package. … or the new rule where the comment period has just closed, let's remember the PTO is not the only organ of the executive branch here.
54 min of audioOral argument — Paul A. Cimino v. International Business Machin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020
This is a False Claims Act case at the pleading stage. … Singh did, which is that this is a False Claims Act at the pleading stage.
42 min of audioOral argument — Village of Bolingbrook v. Illinois American Water Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018
And voluntary and involuntary dismissal are fundamentally different in this context because the one is part of the inherent authority of the court to make sure that its docket is clean of orders that are … of limitations by filing a nullity in the circuit court and then voluntarily dismissing it and using that to bootstrap a case back later into the circuit court saying, well, I'm within the limitations period
50 min of audioOral argument — NLRB v. VCNCL, L.L.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016
And they didn't give you notice, employer notice, and the comment was made that—objecting to that and concluding with saying that that's not protected. I don't believe that's a protected act. … Well, the employees are protected in many ways by the National Labor Relations Act. Unless there is a protection on the act, however, the employees do not have the protection of that act.
34 min of audioOral argument — Emerald Coal Resources v. Ronald M.Hoy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2015
First of all, the inspections on September 22, 2011, under the 103G, weren't about the time period that Hoy and Franks said the violations occurred. … They acted how Congress and the Mine Act would expect them to act.
58 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.