Documents

Oral argument — Kelly v. Budge

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2008

And some of us remember how we acted at 15. We also remember we made mistakes at 15. Some of us didn't have to pay the price. And I'm not excusing Mr. Kelly. … But as far as the sentencing judge, there was a comment about how he didn't know who the shooter was.

Oral argument — United States v. Rico Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

The state of mind has to be when the acts were committed. And I think it may be – What's your story to that? … Even if you take the comments to be somewhat of a comment on the strength of the evidence as a whole, I think you also can look to the fact that Judge Friedman, who understands harmless disanalysis himself

Oral argument — Bell v. Advanced Telcom Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2005

And reciprocal compensation is something required under Section 251 B-5 of the Act. … That's subject to how the parties write questions in arbitration petitions months or years before the FCC acts.

Oral argument — L.E. v. Superintendent of Cobb County School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022

This is in violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. … May I make a concluding comment? You may.

Oral argument — Safeworks Illinois Occupational Health Services v. St. Mary's Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2011

There was some evidence showing that they failed to act upon it. I think the court used the term waiver, but I don't think that's accurate. … Two, as for a period of time when these employees were not employed, there is no such period.

Oral argument — SWA Painting, Inc. v. Golden Eagle Ins.Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2008

We could debate reasonable expectations argument, Justice Thomas, but my understanding of reasonable expectation is it must be based on some affirmative act or statement made by the agent, the company, … If you take it over, and I want it painted candy apple red, and it comes back and it's been painted candy apple red, but as I walk around, I can see a place where I ended up with an air bubble that left

Oral argument — CHERRY v. BANK OF AMERICA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2004

They weren't pulled out of the air. They weren't made up pursuant to some claim of sole discretion. They were the rates contained in the contracts. … And again, back to the 90-day notice period. In terms of which agreement? Which agreement, though. That's what I'm trying to get at.

Oral argument — Rodrigues da Silva v. Silveira da Silva

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025

So they're in school a lot, they're absent more than a particular child, and they act out in school. … We've sort of aired out whether that was right or wrong. What else was really negative in the fact presentation about how that child's connection to the United States is?

Oral argument — United States v. Gutierrez-Campos

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2023

The constitutional issues that animated this court's associate precedents were thoroughly aired in that series of cases. … And so there are periods of time where there's not information flowing to Mr. Gutierrez' confidences about what's going on.

Oral argument — United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2025

Therefore, the jury may infer I acted in good faith. … It occurred over a period of time.

Oral argument — Avi Adelman v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2019

Why was she acting that way? That was only one officer. The other officer had not been trained on the photography policy, just as Ms. Branch had not been trained on the photography policy. … The other officers at the scene, you can pick up comments saying they're wondering why she's approaching him. They don't view him as a threat. They don't view him as interfering.

Oral argument — United States v. Gregory Bartko

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2013

Now, it's time for the Eastern District of North Carolina to clean up its act. You're playing fast and loose. Our job's not here to protect the government. It's to make sure that you and Mr. … You know, that just strains credulity, and let me tell you, I've been an appellate judge for twenty-eight years, and I have never made these kind of comments to a prosecutor, never.

Oral argument — R&L CARRIERS v. DRIVERTECH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2011

And no, we did not have notice as to exactly how our products are contributing to the infringement because they didn't, in fact, identify any specific act of direct infringement. … No, but I would like to comment that we have Cleveland-based law firms on both sides of the V here, which makes me feel very close to home. Thank you for that, Your Honor. Thank you. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Lezmond Mitchell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 18, 2020

There was a very long period of time when the government didn't seek to execute anyone. … And so the 1937 Act diversified the method, as legislative history said, but we don't think that that Act in any way either required or contemplated that the federal government would give up control over

Oral argument — Bianco v. Globus Medical, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2015

Could you comment on that? Sure, Your Honor. … It's section 39, comment H. They cite the first half of that comment, which says most jurisdictions draw a difference between new product ideas and trade secrets.

Oral argument — CFE Racing Products v. BMF Wheels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2015

He awarded statutory damages $250 under the Act. … So recognize the Act applies, but the plain text of the Act says you're entitled to actual damages or $250, so one of those two things, together with reasonable attorney's fees.

Oral argument — Estate of Katherine Monica Vickers v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026

So is your argument then that there continued to be a confidential relationship during this time period when the daughter was basically calling to report what was going on with her mother? … We mentioned jurisdiction specifically in the reply, and then in our opening brief, we argued that it was air for the district court to go further beyond resolving the statute of limitations claim or the

Oral argument — United States v. Sonny Mack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022

The only other bit that I would point out here is that just on the on the degree to which the judge explains his sentence, the government's opposition was predicated upon it being plain air. … In terms of the court's comments at the second and third sentencing hearings, at JA-98, the court came back on the record and said it understood that 120 months was the statutory max, that that became

Oral argument — United States v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2004

But the government's comments seemed to be in the past tense. … I would go through and recount various events, various statements, various acts on the part of the defendant. And then I would say periodically he was many things.

Oral argument — EEOC v. AutoZone Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2017

There are acts of harassment in that ensuing period. And AutoZone still has a problem with its affirmative. … I mean, there were acts of harassment in that two-week period which precludes summary judgment on the affirmative defense. There's ample case law.