Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.66s

  • Oral argument — KEYnetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

    They tried to go down that road that there could be intervening acts, and certainly there could be things added within the algorithm because of the comprising language. … But I believe, you know, to address Judge O'Malley's comments about, you know, the period of time, you know, I think the specification clearly teaches that the time has to be short enough to ignore the

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wilmac v. The Honorable Micheal OLeavitt

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    I have to just make a comment. I've been on this court for 29 years, and it's such a pleasure to me to see women lawyers arguing before the court, finally in great numbers. … The same thing was in play in the Truth in Lending Act case, Ramadan. That case also involved a statute that has the title jurisdiction. That case was found to have a limitations period.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Michael Koziara v. BNSF Railway Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2016

    The Federal Railroad Safety Act, with regard to the legal standard, prohibits discrimination based on protected activity. … I'm simply contending that under the theory, the chain of events theory of liability, under contributing factor in the Air 21 framework, Judge Peterson correctly ruled in our favor on summary judgment.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Interest of N.M. & M.M., Minors

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2011

    And I use a time period. I break this up into two time periods, March 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008, because that's when the respondent was arrested. … So the trial court did not specifically comment on it. So for the defendant to characterize the trial court did not find is not necessarily true. The trial court simply did not comment on it.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Penner v. Chase Bank USA NA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2009

    Comment three is directly applicable, and section 226.9c1 says very simply, if a periodic rate is increased because of the consumer's delinquency or default, written notice of the increase shall be given … They sought public comment. They studied it. They issued proposed rules to address it, which they've now adopted.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Qin v. Vertex Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

    Harder, and they were all subject to the same 2018 performance evaluation period. … Hart was discriminatory or actually acting on stereotypes at the time that he made the comments, but that actually he was able to tell HR the reasons why he felt that Mr.

    74 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Apple Inc. v. Squires

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2026

    They can open up a new comment period or amend the proposed rules and then have a new rule package. … or the new rule where the comment period has just closed, let's remember the PTO is not the only organ of the executive branch here.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Leopard Marine & Trading, Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2017

    involuntary guarantor to pay, you need to act quickly to tell them that there's a problem. … And the historic purpose behind the Maritime Lien Act is to allow ships to continue in commerce.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Paul A. Cimino v. International Business Machin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2020

    This is a False Claims Act case at the pleading stage. … Singh did, which is that this is a False Claims Act at the pleading stage.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Music Choice v. CRB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2025

    First, the judges publish the settlement terms, and there's a period where people can... Interested parties can comment, okay? … When they have the notice and comment period, do you typically not get comments from individual copyright holders? They just trust SoundExchange to handle that? For settlements?

    114 min of audio
  • Oral argument — U.S. Futures Exchange, L.L.C. v. Board of Trade of the City of

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2019

    The agency, their expert themselves, in the summary judgment record, acknowledged that there had never been such a short public comment period before, and there simply wasn't sufficient deliberation of … Critically, they provided for public comment. It was a short period, but again, they had no obligation to do so. These plaintiffs came in and objected to the CFTC's approval of the rule.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bruce Eklund v. City of Seattle Municiple Cour

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2010

    The Supreme Court case said, you can act as both, that's fine. Wait. You can act as both, my understanding is, for one of these pre-termination hearings. … And, and you say, was that a, I couldn't get you a comment on that.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bardhan v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026

    We had a complaint with the correct affidavit of airship and airs, and were set to proceed to trial, and were ready to go. … Do you want to comment on that part? It culminated with a motion in limine.

    64 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Lacy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2012

    The purpose of the Speedy Trial Act is to act as a shield to protect the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial. … He never commented on that, he just granted the continuance. Granted the continuance.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Thomas Clinton v. Cooper

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

    Here, what we have, in addition to the comment you've referred to, which, by the way, should be taken merely as her own personal view rather than, for example, the view of a penological expert opining … So you're saying that he – by that very act, he retaliated against her for reporting the rape. That's correct, Your Honor. And this Court in Brodheim v.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Almonte-Nunez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2020

    It was just Spanish language documents that this court could not consider because of the Jones Act. … And nothing precludes this court right now from addressing on plain air review or de novo as we think it should be. It's right for this court to determine.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Padilla-Galarza

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

    Castro, the comments of counsel at the start of the trial with respect to the need for more time to review the jinx material and your response that counsel should have made the time or should have gotten … Are you saying that those, as opposed to those being plain air issues, you're arguing that those objections were waived?

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — WARRIOR SPORTS v. DICKINSON WRIGHT

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2010

    Code and the Code of Federal Regulations of the time periods of when it can be reinstated, what a petitioner needs to show as far as why that payment wasn't done and the unavoidable delay standard and … And I think that that's what this court said in the air measurement case. I think that's correct.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bryan v. McDonald

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

    If you're now telling us that this came out of whole cloth or thin air or whatever, that's quite a new concept and quite a dramatic one. … The evidence from that time period shows only that there was dental trauma and teeth loss.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — John Wolfe v. Frank D'Errico

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2016

    I didn't want my comment to be taken that I was arguing the facts. … So what he would have this court do is affirm all the reversed and remanded issues so they cannot be acted upon as requested by the district court. And that's completely improper.

    30 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.