Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.93s
Oral argument — United States v. Bolin
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2020
He did, however, comment on them and managed a Facebook group in which other people commented on the attacks. … Period. Period. I mean, why should someone who's on supervised release be able to communicate messages of hate and violence? Period. Well, a supervisee may have a limited First Amendment right.
25 min of audioOral argument — Mokena Community Park District v. Romanek
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2019
They are, yes So there's really, arguably, the same board only for one year period? Or how many year period? Is there arguably no change in the board composition? I'm sorry? … hour agenda You have to identify what it is that's going to be discussed You have to have a motion, a second, discussion, public comment None of this happened in 2015 when this was self-renewed And again
30 min of audioOral argument — Cerami v. Cerami
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2018
She also waives under that premarital agreement the right to act as administrator. She petitioned to act as administrator. … For instance, in the Probate Act, there's three-month and six-month claims periods. And those are relied on very heavily by the probate court to allow for the distribution and closing of estates.
38 min of audioOral argument — James C. Wenzler v. United States Coast Guard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2026
They weren't airing personal grievances. They are matters that are discussed in the public. They're on his LinkedIn. It's a public post. … The act of posting something that could bring disarray against or taint the auxiliary in some way? Well, I think that's a separate issue in HICS, right?
22 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2025
I think in their brief they said about $20,000 is up in the air. Right. And my point is that that just, as far as we can tell, has nothing to do with the Section 6-3-30 proceeding. … One, I don't ascribe much significance to the singular determination, given the Dictionary Act, that singular can also mean plural.
47 min of audioOral argument — CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. EEOC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2016
And she said, assuming the truth of everything that's in these depositions, there may be examples of sporadic exceptions to that, where the managers could have done a better job, maybe they didn't act … It's aired in the amicus briefs, and Mr. Smith certainly could have addressed it at greater length in his reply brief.
60 min of audioOral argument — Huntington v. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2018
That's just a matter of going down the road or the rails or in the air. That's why they tell you to put your seatbelt on when you're still seated in an airplane. … And I'm not contesting the act. If an evidence deposition would be impossible, what would you do at a trial?
39 min of audioOral argument — Wallace v. FedEx Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014
Wallace was prejudiced by FedEx's violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act. … This was a definition of a time period that's vague in the statute, made through an adequate rulemaking procedure, including notice and comment, and for that reason, it's appropriate and should not be
34 min of audioOral argument — Kramer v. Ruiz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020
Judge Duggan abused his discretion or acted in an arbitrary fashion. … I do see that I'm over my time and I wonder if I might just provide one concluding sentence or comment. Go ahead.
38 min of audioOral argument — Wagner v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2012
His comments on the record were, I want this case decided by the end of the year. One way or the other. Settle it or try it. … I have one comment that I'd like to make, and I want to make sure I clarify something from the briefs.
23 min of audioOral argument — Reya Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014
But from the evidence the court considered, these remarks were made over a period of what time? Two days. Two days. Yes, sir. … No, but if she acts upon... Your client has to be discriminated against by reason of her race. Correct. All right.
41 min of audioOral argument — Gentile v. SEC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020
Gentile has also had comments. I guess I don't understand the lack of urgency here. … We talked a little about Tucker Act or Federal Tort Claims Act.
44 min of audioOral argument — Scott Trujillo v. Henniges Automotive Sealing Systems North America Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014
We're here on an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in this retaliation case brought under Title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act and the Michigan Elliott Larson Civil Rights Act. … But the case law cited by a plaintiff, the time period is much shorter.
32 min of audioOral argument — Kevin Lindke v. James Freed
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2024
Freed didn't like the negative comments that were said about him. The Michigan, or excuse me, the U.S. … But at the time this case was being litigated, this was a very, very up in the air issue. There was no test.
37 min of audioOral argument — New England Fishermen's Stewardship Association v. Lutnick
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2026
So looking at the statute 1854A, your argument depends in large part on the end of 3, if the secretary does not notify a council within 30 days of the end of the comment period of the approval, disapproval … Has the notice and comment period resulted in changes from proposed regulations which were based on Advisory Council plans and then the final regulations? Yes.
44 min of audioOral argument — Germinaro v. Fidelity National
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018
May it please the court, I'd like to limit my comments this morning as I've been answering your questions to one point. … And in the RICO case statement, very specifically, the plaintiff is asked to identify the pattern of racketeering and identifies only predicate acts within a nine-and-a-half-month period.
36 min of audioOral argument — Giuliano v. SanDisk LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2017
I'd like to clean up a few quick things that appear to cause some confusion. … And, Your Honor, that fuels the inference here that all they're doing is trying to act like Mr.
41 min of audioOral argument — Lynch v. McDonough
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2021
Let's assume we were writing on a clean slate. What do you think the test ought to be? The statute says approximate balance. How do you want to interpret that or clarify that or add to it? … If we have to determine what the law existed or what the interpretation of the benefit of the doubt and reasonable doubt rules were at the time of the Veterans Judicial Review Act of 1988, which is the
46 min of audioOral argument — People v. Russell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2015
But it's a cleaning stage, right? So it gets, it gets more difficult as you go up the stages. Okay, anything else, counsel, at this point? … Was it a significant period of time? Yes, he was checked into lockup at 2.30 in the morning on April 12th. He was checked out of lockup at 3.30 in the morning on April 12th, so an hour later.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rodney Coby
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2023
You don't have to have personally committed those acts or been part of the chain of distribution. … You indicate that he selected a sentence on a clean slate, and therefore, this is more likely not in relation to a range, but to his independent determination of how many years the man should serve.
45 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.