Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Oral argument — Reya Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014

    But from the evidence the court considered, these remarks were made over a period of what time? Two days. Two days. Yes, sir. … No, but if she acts upon... Your client has to be discriminated against by reason of her race. Correct. All right.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kevin Lindke v. James Freed

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2024

    Freed didn't like the negative comments that were said about him. The Michigan, or excuse me, the U.S. … But at the time this case was being litigated, this was a very, very up in the air issue. There was no test.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — James Tate, Jr. v. University Medical Center

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2012

    If there are no questions, I have no further comments. No questions here. Thank you. Well, Mr. Ryan read Ms. Silver's comments in response to testimony in response to my questions at the deposition. … Now, the annual operating plans are subject to the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act because they are discretionary agency decisions that may have impacts on the endangered

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Michael Sarno

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2022

    that's true nor did the medical records support the notion that the defendant is likely to receive an above-knee amputation amputation there's nothing in the medical records that I see that supports that comment … which I the government agrees is unclear regardless of that there the defendant has shown absolutely no prejudice as a result of receiving or being quote-unquote unable to respond to the government's comments

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — KEYnetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

    They tried to go down that road that there could be intervening acts, and certainly there could be things added within the algorithm because of the comprising language. … But I believe, you know, to address Judge O'Malley's comments about, you know, the period of time, you know, I think the specification clearly teaches that the time has to be short enough to ignore the

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wilmac v. The Honorable Micheal OLeavitt

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    I have to just make a comment. I've been on this court for 29 years, and it's such a pleasure to me to see women lawyers arguing before the court, finally in great numbers. … The same thing was in play in the Truth in Lending Act case, Ramadan. That case also involved a statute that has the title jurisdiction. That case was found to have a limitations period.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Schreiber v. Cuccinelli

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2019

    Well, under B1C, in addition to undergoing the act of legitimation, you also need legal custody. … That's not a place where a constitutional claim is normally aired. It's not an adversarial proceeding.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Willis

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014

    Willis based on his actual acts or based upon accountability for the acts of Aaron Miller. It's a gray area. You don't know. Does it matter for purposes of the argument you're bringing? … It just doesn't make a whole lot of difference whether they decided based on accountability or on his own acts. With regard to counsel's comment that People v.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Penner v. Chase Bank USA NA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2009

    Comment three is directly applicable, and section 226.9c1 says very simply, if a periodic rate is increased because of the consumer's delinquency or default, written notice of the increase shall be given … They sought public comment. They studied it. They issued proposed rules to address it, which they've now adopted.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2020

    So there's no case saying that Harmonia has this indefinite period of time. Is there a regulation? … A couple of comments.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Cerami v. Cerami

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2018

    She also waives under that premarital agreement the right to act as administrator. She petitioned to act as administrator. … For instance, in the Probate Act, there's three-month and six-month claims periods. And those are relied on very heavily by the probate court to allow for the distribution and closing of estates.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Music Choice v. CRB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2025

    First, the judges publish the settlement terms, and there's a period where people can... Interested parties can comment, okay? … When they have the notice and comment period, do you typically not get comments from individual copyright holders? They just trust SoundExchange to handle that? For settlements?

    114 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mokena Community Park District v. Romanek

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2019

    They are, yes So there's really, arguably, the same board only for one year period? Or how many year period? Is there arguably no change in the board composition? I'm sorry? … hour agenda You have to identify what it is that's going to be discussed You have to have a motion, a second, discussion, public comment None of this happened in 2015 when this was self-renewed And again

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bruce Eklund v. City of Seattle Municiple Cour

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2010

    The Supreme Court case said, you can act as both, that's fine. Wait. You can act as both, my understanding is, for one of these pre-termination hearings. … And, and you say, was that a, I couldn't get you a comment on that.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Ware

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2013

    Had her probation been revoked during that period of time, she certainly would have been in the penitentiary. … The comments made during the argument were not improper. The comments were made in rebuttal here, and it's the state's position that they were invited by defense counsel.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Thomas Clinton v. Cooper

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

    Here, what we have, in addition to the comment you've referred to, which, by the way, should be taken merely as her own personal view rather than, for example, the view of a penological expert opining … So you're saying that he – by that very act, he retaliated against her for reporting the rape. That's correct, Your Honor. And this Court in Brodheim v.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Almonte-Nunez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2020

    It was just Spanish language documents that this court could not consider because of the Jones Act. … And nothing precludes this court right now from addressing on plain air review or de novo as we think it should be. It's right for this court to determine.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Padilla-Galarza

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

    Castro, the comments of counsel at the start of the trial with respect to the need for more time to review the jinx material and your response that counsel should have made the time or should have gotten … Are you saying that those, as opposed to those being plain air issues, you're arguing that those objections were waived?

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Appointment of Special Prosecutor (Better Government Association v. Office of the Special Prosecutor Dan K. Webb)

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2018

    I see I've used up my time, so I will have further comments later. Mr. Weber, you've agreed to split your time. We have, Your Honor. You'll get a three-minute warning. Excellent. … That's completely contrary to the purpose of the Freedom of Information Act.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stop Northpoint, LLC v. City of Joliet

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 28, 2023

    And I'm going to stand by the briefs under the Open Meetings Act. But they had zoning planning commission rule at the height of the corona pandemic. … We set forth that respiratory illnesses are going to develop from people, you know, being exposed to the soot and other air pollution associated with it.

    32 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.