Documents

Oral argument — Pavnica v. Veguilla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2010

traveling He gave him Levaquin at that time which is a broad spectrum antibiotic but it's an antibiotic that only covers for anaerobic bacteria not anaerobic bacteria which is bacteria that doesn't need air … They acted as physicians. But this was after the fact.

Oral argument — United States v. Demi Muniz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015

He was totally acting erratically. I mean, he's taking his shirt off, taking his shirt off, putting it back on, saying he's hot, saying he's cold. That's not normal. That's correct, Your Honor. … That was one, that was your penultimate sentence, period. Everything else was based on Parsons, which may be fine.

Oral argument — Thompson Awnings v. Joshua Fullerton

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2018

Judge Kupf aired, he said, well, there's no way Banks could have known about the subsequently diagnosed fractured ribs and the collapsed lung and all that stuff because that happened 15 days after Awning … Sledge, the Eighth Circuit said that the very act of resisting arrest provides probable cause for arrest. Officer Fullerton informed Mr.

Oral argument — STANLEY v. CARR-GOTTSTEIN PROP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2004

Such an act would be simply futile on the Stanley's part to try to replant their property to gain legal access to Lot 2. … I had one comment. I have to make a brief comment. Thank you. My brief comment is regarding the intended beneficiaries of the Stanleys.

Oral argument — Cerveceria Modelo de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. CB Brand Strategies, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2024

So Constellation had been selling Modelo products in the United States for a period of time, pursuant to the joint venture. … Don't tell me it was wrong when you don't raise it as air.

Oral argument — Benitez-Pinot v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

So what do do you have any comment on that? Well, it's okay if you don't. … That's correct, Your Honor, that he did not act...

Oral argument — Dairy Employees Union Local17 v. Robert Vander Eyk Dairy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2016

And taking the lead from the opening comments, are there questions you wish me to address before I make my comments? … It says an employer or somebody acting on behalf of, I don't recall the exact words, but somebody who's acting as an employer with regard to the employees.

Oral argument — Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. A-S Medication Solutions, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2020

These aren't people who we're just picking out of thin air. These are customers who consented. We're sending them pharmacy information. … Was there any limitation on discovery during that relatively short period of August to December?

Oral argument — United States v. Dan Wallen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2017

No, Your Honor, that was the air below where the judge qualified that it was objectively reasonable. … Wallen, period. That's correct. And I think that goes into what Your Honor was addressing earlier, that under any standard, the judge found that Mr.

Oral argument — Bornstein v. Monmouth County Sheriffs Office

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2016

Well, and she said, you know, there really is no deliberate indifference because that's usually a lengthy time period, et cetera, et cetera. … He was opining merely about whether or not your client acted reasonably or whether they acted unreasonably.

Oral argument — +Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006

I agree with the comments of the ITC's counsel with regard to what you should do under your hypothetical, which is if you, in fact, can't decide, you should remand with whatever findings you, in fact, … With all due respect, Your Honor, you will never have a completely settled, clean, no more disputes, no more questions on which the agency might have something to say.

Oral argument — Ventana Wilderness v. Bradford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2009

Was there during the period of time that the retired couple owned it? There is a dispute of fact whether there was grazing during the period when the Zitterbarts owned the lands. … And when the Forest Service went through the public comment period to prepare its EA, ultimately in 2005, my clients raised the issue that authorizing grazing on those lands would conflict with the public's

Oral argument — Erick Marquez v. Weinstein, Pinson & Riley, P.S

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2016

So I have two things I would like you to comment on briefly. … Your Honor, I would like to respond to the very last comment made by my opponent.

Oral argument — Montana Wildlife Federation v. David Bernhardt

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

Period. That's what they do. So how is and the only thing you've told me so far is they can make it less attractive by putting these conditions on. … And it was entirely appropriate for the district court to give BLM a clean slate on remand so that it could, it could apply prioritization accurately.

Oral argument — Hochhalter v. Stephens Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2008

First of all, back on the family leave act retaliation. … So there was a period of time in there that we actually have concrete damages that we can calculate for that time period. Okay.

Oral argument — Asia Vital Components Co. v. Asetek Danmark A/S

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2016

There was no attempt to clear the air. I think we have your argument. One more sentence. Thank you, Your Honor. … Any one further comment? Just one quick question. Mr.

Oral argument — Cigar Association of America Inc v. City of Phila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2021

He said it three times in the course of his comments on the matter. He said that the preemptive scope is, quote, the areas that are specifically addressed by the bill. He said that three times. … I don't think the court can just discern out of the air that substantial economic harm is at issue. That's what plaintiffs have to prove.

Oral argument — Soto v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2025

One is the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act discussed by the Federal Circuit in Hernandez v. Department of Air Force. … And the other point, there's no other form of military compensation where the limitations period is inapplicable, correct? Yeah.

Oral argument — Kean v. Wal-Mart Stores

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2009

So Russell followed the clean construction procedure, except that he did not obtain the injunction. … And it comments that perhaps the courts aren't quick enough to realize this, but that is a payment under duress.

Oral argument — 3137, LLC v. Town of Harwich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2024

So the Perks restaurant is an open-air restaurant that shares the same airspace. I'm not asking about what the restaurant is like. … Otherwise, they're entities licensed under the Liquor Control Act. They're licensed under the Entertainment Licensing Statute. They're enforced under the same liquor control act. Who had more seats?