Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Oral argument — John Ingram v. Vivus Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2015
Well, the bottom line vote and also the comments of the FDA committee members who looked at and interpreted the data. … And it specifically doesn't suffice when it's based entirely on hindsight comments made by members of the Advisory Committee panel at the end of the class period.
31 min of audioOral argument — Trump v. Vance, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2019
And he's not allowed to simply turn this into an act of the sovereign by saying I am the sovereign and the sovereign is me. … I would not say everyone is going to act in bad faith. Even in Clinton v.
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lezmond Mitchell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 18, 2020
There was a very long period of time when the government didn't seek to execute anyone. … And so the 1937 Act diversified the method, as legislative history said, but we don't think that that Act in any way either required or contemplated that the federal government would give up control over
60 min of audioOral argument — Kindel v. Tennis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2011
I can't be more precise, but we would acknowledge it was for a fairly significant period of time prior to the date of injury. Doing primarily the same type of work? Including the same type of work. … The dog ran out of the back yard, his nose off in the air, excited from running back, and struck the 10-year-old boy in the head.
41 min of audioOral argument — People v. Gonzalez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2025
Historically, what ends up happening is the question usually ends up, assuming that the death doesn't occur in a relatively short period of time, was it necessary to shoot the opponent or defend yourself … Why was that not aired? Your Honor, the instruction is that he acted with the intention to prevent a forcible felony. It is not whether a forcible felony occurred at all.
42 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2016
That issue goes to the question of this Consumer Protection Act. … But I would agree that it would put an undue burden on us to kind of reinvent out of air some affidavit that shows definitively that what his allegations are true.
33 min of audioOral argument — Boktor v. Prudential
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2006
But the very act of sending in the form and having it received by the insurance company binds the company to the policy. … Under Insurance Code Section 10088, the California legislature has indicated that they really don't want the issue of earthquake coverage to be something that's up in the air.
30 min of audioOral argument — Husyev v. Mukasey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007
In order to prevail in such a case, petitioners must show that prior, that competent counsel would have acted otherwise, and that the outcome of the proceedings may have been different. … But then he went on to feel that this still was not a reasonable period of time.
42 min of audioOral argument — Ramon Cortesluna v. Manuel Leon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2020
Let's cut to the chase where there's a knife and instead of keeping his hands in the air, your client at one point lowered his hands and he didn't, in fact, reach for the knife, but that isn't the question … It's three seconds, which in geological time, or even just regular time, is a short period of time, but it is time enough to give a person some warning. You only have a few minutes left.
32 min of audioOral argument — Inge Smothers v. Rowley Mem. Masonic Home
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022
But whether the Supreme Court is going to answer that question, whether they answer the question of motivating factor or not during that period is uncertain. … We did not believe the district court aired any of its analysis aside from the relevancy and weighing of the factors.
31 min of audioOral argument — Black Rock Coffee Bar, LLC v. BR Coffee, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2025
They all come to the standard is that we get a fundamentally fair evidentiary hearing, period. That is the gold standard of the arbitration. We were not getting that. … And I know it's a lot to wrangle, but if the court is able to take the time to meticulously go through that, they will see that that clear air standard is not met.
33 min of audioOral argument — Harry Haury v. CIR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2014
Well unclear air review The You have to also compare the fact you have to not lose sight of the fact that he had a salary to protect and That was his only I understand we're talking about the investment … He made the loans between February and July of 2007 in the interim during that period in June of 2007 DHS awarded Sandia a 15 million time and material contract and then Then Sandia in turn entered into
32 min of audioOral argument — Okwuosa v. EDD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005
And there's never any comments about in that proof offered by the defendants that his work, the substantive level of his work, was substandard. He didn't go to training classes. … And so if today he loses this appeal, then the people that are watching this case, and there are many, will not know how are you supposed to act at work.
22 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Reyes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2003
So instead of saying that these predicate acts have to be a continuing series, it instead becomes predicate acts that have to occur over a definite period of time, which the government argues means the … Do you have one last comment? Yes. One about whether or not Mr.
23 min of audioOral argument — Luke Waid v. Richard Snyder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2020
I wonder if you could comment on another point. … Okay, past acts of desegregation.
88 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Grover Ferguson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2016
I think the state courts that have acted, that we've cited, and I understand law goes the other way as well, the state courts that have acted in the aftermath of, in particular, Miller and Montgomery, … If he fires into the air to scare somebody, it's a 10-year guideline, and it's a 10-year guideline if he puts three bullets at point-blank range into her head, right?
28 min of audioOral argument — Xingjian Sun v. Gary Xu
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024
So he was taking it upon himself to do this act and alert the media. … Sun's accusations and still conclude that these terrible acts occurred.
28 min of audioOral argument — Sharikyan v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2010
But sometimes it makes additional comments, so it's doing something other than simply adopting and affirming. And in this instance, they started talking about particular parts. … This is a pre-Real ID Act case. No corroboration is necessary. If anything, if there is a discrepancy with what the son said, his testimony could be discounted.
25 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Javier Perez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2020
I don't think it's forthright to comment. … I mean, discussing this in the air is not helpful. I mean, there are some... And the problem with being specific is that there weren't specific objections, which is why it becomes...
76 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mark Kuhrt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015
Lopez's defense that he didn't act with criminal intent, that there was no criminal intent. It's uncontested that he recommended disclosure. … Well, if they can't identify it for restitution, how can the court just pick a number out of the air and use the $2 billion?
67 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.