Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.19s

  • Oral argument — Groff v. DeJoy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

    So it has not been silent when it hasn't liked a definition that we've given something in the Civil Rights Act. In many other acts it remains silent, but not on this one. In Alexander v. … Then maybe we could do a good day's work and put a period at the end of it by saying that that is not the law.

    107 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Green

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2004

    She acted within her authority that was understood to exist pre-Blakely. … Well, we know from Judge Mulway's comment that she was visiting a psychologist.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Ellis

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026

    The state is not wrong that there are some conflicting comments about what recordings the defense ever received, but there's no question that it received a curated subset of what was gathered. … The final clean copy that went to the jury omitted this instruction.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — John v. Alaska Fish & Wildlife Federation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2011

    It's much more efficient and clean than some sort of an adjudication which would Presumably deal with these matters on a case-by-case river-by-river refuge-by-refuge case Water rights are kind of property … subsistence users when there is a shortage as opposed to the other Individualized allocations So it seems like we cut all those people off from litigating Well, I mean they have a opportunity to for notice and comment

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Louisiana Public Service Comm v. FERC NOTE: Due to technical difficulties, there is a short 3 minute gap in the middle of the audio.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2018

    Normally, that doesn't just spring out of the air. And even if it does, it's initiated by the commission, it would be noticed. … It didn't occur simply because of the long period of time that occurred here. It happened within a very short window of time. Do you know when? I think it was in the late 2000 time period.

    91 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Willie Meche v. Key Energy Services, L.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2014

    What's critical in this situation, really relative to both the issues of maintenance and cure in the case as well as the training that goes towards the negligence issue in the case under the Jones Act, … He said, I keep a clean boat. I said, no oil or grease, no oil or grease. Well, lifting a 100-pound hatch that has a hinge is different from lifting 100 pounds of dead weight.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Agape Motorcoach Retreat, LLC v. Glenda Brintle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

    to value the property as defined in the condemnation petition and is evaluated by the commissioners, both as to the take and as to the residue and damages thereto, then if the court performs another act … Burns Clean it up I Feel like there's so many questions and so little time If I may I'd like to address the the state Excuse me the private individuals the what we have termed the Boland easement and the

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018

    that at least part of the rules related to the competitive harm piece was a significant change and therefore opened up the comment period to allow people to continue to- Okay, but how are we to decide … It has to have notice and comment. It has to consider and respond to those comments.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Linda Harrell v. Delaware North Companies

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2015

    Delaware North, over a period of time, was trying to determine how best to deal with this circumstance. … They wanted to determine whether they had done the right thing, whether they had acted in a way that was proper within the meaning of the law, whether they had acted in terms of the investigations, in

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Diane Trahanas v. Northwestern University

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2022

    You've got to get your act together. … She acted as every human being we could think of would have acted, in her circumstance.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Marker

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2009

    The comments the court made at reconsideration to the effect of if the arrest is bad, everything after it is bad, those comments make clear that the court did intend its ruling on reconsideration to have … So I take serious issue with that comment. And I think we need to remember, too, again, in response to a comment made by the state, it's not findings.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — National Labor Relations Board v. Grill Concepts Services, Inc. dba Daily Grill

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024

    The record is just a passing comment, a hearsay comment by somebody on the union side who says, everybody but you negotiated. What does that mean? … and isn't necessarily taking its responsibilities under the Act seriously.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Don't Look Media LLC v. Fly Victor Limited

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021

    The district court correctly held that the appellant failed to assert a colorable claim and had not identified any predicate acts. … Whether you be or you look at D, there was no service in the United States, period. And that renders the claim dismissible. Correct. Let me ask you something.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — A.S.Miller v. Smithkline Beecham

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014

    Case after case says you can have relation back as long, even if the pleading, the complaint has been dismissed, it's been acted upon, has disappeared into thin air, as long as a case is pending somewhere … It was a Wage and Hour Act type case.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Allen Wiseley v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2017

    I'm not sure if there's a specific provision in that specific act. There's very strong provisions for protecting consumers. … It didn't change from the period of time that Mr. Wise was here. Well, then how can you say the way we've interpreted it? Because it sounds like you never have.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Willis

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014

    Willis based on his actual acts or based upon accountability for the acts of Aaron Miller. It's a gray area. You don't know. Does it matter for purposes of the argument you're bringing? … It just doesn't make a whole lot of difference whether they decided based on accountability or on his own acts. With regard to counsel's comment that People v.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Schreiber v. Cuccinelli

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2019

    Well, under B1C, in addition to undergoing the act of legitimation, you also need legal custody. … That's not a place where a constitutional claim is normally aired. It's not an adversarial proceeding.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Metropolitan Life v. Hamer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2012

    Through their comments, we're thinking of known tax liability. … Because as I explained in my opening comments in the 1984 Act, because of how the program was designed there were a lot of income taxpayers that would not have been able to participate which would then

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DEY PHARMA v. SUNOVION PHARMA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012

    Well, it's already a point, but there's language in both Jansen and Karaka that I want you to comment on. … If it wasn't under settlement, but rather this was because that was the time period where they expire, that was the time period where...

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Scott Sperling

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017

    And on my standard of review, which you've now agreed to, clear air, I don't know how to go around that. … And Congress, at the same time that it enacts this five-year mandatory minimum in the Adam Walsh Act, also enhances the recidivist penalties for individuals who are charged with the crimes for the same

    32 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.