Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.19s
Oral argument — Groff v. DeJoy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023
So it has not been silent when it hasn't liked a definition that we've given something in the Civil Rights Act. In many other acts it remains silent, but not on this one. In Alexander v. … Then maybe we could do a good day's work and put a period at the end of it by saying that that is not the law.
107 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Green
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2004
She acted within her authority that was understood to exist pre-Blakely. … Well, we know from Judge Mulway's comment that she was visiting a psychologist.
44 min of audioOral argument — People v. Ellis
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026
The state is not wrong that there are some conflicting comments about what recordings the defense ever received, but there's no question that it received a curated subset of what was gathered. … The final clean copy that went to the jury omitted this instruction.
46 min of audioOral argument — John v. Alaska Fish & Wildlife Federation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2011
It's much more efficient and clean than some sort of an adjudication which would Presumably deal with these matters on a case-by-case river-by-river refuge-by-refuge case Water rights are kind of property … subsistence users when there is a shortage as opposed to the other Individualized allocations So it seems like we cut all those people off from litigating Well, I mean they have a opportunity to for notice and comment
50 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2018
Normally, that doesn't just spring out of the air. And even if it does, it's initiated by the commission, it would be noticed. … It didn't occur simply because of the long period of time that occurred here. It happened within a very short window of time. Do you know when? I think it was in the late 2000 time period.
91 min of audioOral argument — Willie Meche v. Key Energy Services, L.L.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2014
What's critical in this situation, really relative to both the issues of maintenance and cure in the case as well as the training that goes towards the negligence issue in the case under the Jones Act, … He said, I keep a clean boat. I said, no oil or grease, no oil or grease. Well, lifting a 100-pound hatch that has a hinge is different from lifting 100 pounds of dead weight.
36 min of audioOral argument — Agape Motorcoach Retreat, LLC v. Glenda Brintle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013
to value the property as defined in the condemnation petition and is evaluated by the commissioners, both as to the take and as to the residue and damages thereto, then if the court performs another act … Burns Clean it up I Feel like there's so many questions and so little time If I may I'd like to address the the state Excuse me the private individuals the what we have termed the Boland easement and the
45 min of audioOral argument — Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018
that at least part of the rules related to the competitive harm piece was a significant change and therefore opened up the comment period to allow people to continue to- Okay, but how are we to decide … It has to have notice and comment. It has to consider and respond to those comments.
34 min of audioOral argument — Linda Harrell v. Delaware North Companies
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2015
Delaware North, over a period of time, was trying to determine how best to deal with this circumstance. … They wanted to determine whether they had done the right thing, whether they had acted in a way that was proper within the meaning of the law, whether they had acted in terms of the investigations, in
30 min of audioOral argument — Diane Trahanas v. Northwestern University
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2022
You've got to get your act together. … She acted as every human being we could think of would have acted, in her circumstance.
31 min of audioOral argument — People v. Marker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2009
The comments the court made at reconsideration to the effect of if the arrest is bad, everything after it is bad, those comments make clear that the court did intend its ruling on reconsideration to have … So I take serious issue with that comment. And I think we need to remember, too, again, in response to a comment made by the state, it's not findings.
40 min of audioOral argument — National Labor Relations Board v. Grill Concepts Services, Inc. dba Daily Grill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024
The record is just a passing comment, a hearsay comment by somebody on the union side who says, everybody but you negotiated. What does that mean? … and isn't necessarily taking its responsibilities under the Act seriously.
32 min of audioOral argument — Don't Look Media LLC v. Fly Victor Limited
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021
The district court correctly held that the appellant failed to assert a colorable claim and had not identified any predicate acts. … Whether you be or you look at D, there was no service in the United States, period. And that renders the claim dismissible. Correct. Let me ask you something.
39 min of audioOral argument — A.S.Miller v. Smithkline Beecham
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014
Case after case says you can have relation back as long, even if the pleading, the complaint has been dismissed, it's been acted upon, has disappeared into thin air, as long as a case is pending somewhere … It was a Wage and Hour Act type case.
31 min of audioOral argument — Allen Wiseley v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2017
I'm not sure if there's a specific provision in that specific act. There's very strong provisions for protecting consumers. … It didn't change from the period of time that Mr. Wise was here. Well, then how can you say the way we've interpreted it? Because it sounds like you never have.
44 min of audioOral argument — People v. Willis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014
Willis based on his actual acts or based upon accountability for the acts of Aaron Miller. It's a gray area. You don't know. Does it matter for purposes of the argument you're bringing? … It just doesn't make a whole lot of difference whether they decided based on accountability or on his own acts. With regard to counsel's comment that People v.
40 min of audioOral argument — Schreiber v. Cuccinelli
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2019
Well, under B1C, in addition to undergoing the act of legitimation, you also need legal custody. … That's not a place where a constitutional claim is normally aired. It's not an adversarial proceeding.
34 min of audioOral argument — Metropolitan Life v. Hamer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2012
Through their comments, we're thinking of known tax liability. … Because as I explained in my opening comments in the 1984 Act, because of how the program was designed there were a lot of income taxpayers that would not have been able to participate which would then
45 min of audioOral argument — DEY PHARMA v. SUNOVION PHARMA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012
Well, it's already a point, but there's language in both Jansen and Karaka that I want you to comment on. … If it wasn't under settlement, but rather this was because that was the time period where they expire, that was the time period where...
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Scott Sperling
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017
And on my standard of review, which you've now agreed to, clear air, I don't know how to go around that. … And Congress, at the same time that it enacts this five-year mandatory minimum in the Adam Walsh Act, also enhances the recidivist penalties for individuals who are charged with the crimes for the same
32 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.