Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.13s

  • Oral argument — Moses Taylor Foundation v. ConverysProselect Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

    And then the court goes on to say you haven't identified any damages because it's all just in the air whether you're going to ever face a consequence from a diminution in your coverage. … The breach of contract is because, well, technically, yes, they had the duty to, and I'm sorry, I know I have it in here, to act in our best interest.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Robert Wright, Jr. v. John Goodrich

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2017

    Wright fails to point to any clearly established law where an officer acting under similar circumstances was held to violate a Fourth Amendment. … You've got a situation where the helicopter has identified it from the air.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gomez v. Galman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2021

    Yes, they were, they were police officers, but they were not acting with the air of authority of a police officer. So they were police officers. … These officers were on probationary periods. That gets us to Moneo as well as the color of law.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Reyes

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2003

    So instead of saying that these predicate acts have to be a continuing series, it instead becomes predicate acts that have to occur over a definite period of time, which the government argues means the … Do you have one last comment? Yes. One about whether or not Mr.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gordie Taylor v. Village of Dolton, Illinois

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

    The only issue the district court raised in dismissing that claim was that there were no overt acts of racial hostility within the 300-day limitations period, and thus his claim was untimely. … You look at the gestalt, I guess you could say, and if you can find that the non-overt acts of racism are part and parcel of the overt acts, even if there is no overt acts within the 300-day period, there

    11 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pit River Tribe v. US Forest Service

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2006

    My question is, it seems to me that when you withdraw the moratorium, it would be necessary under the Administrative Procedure Act to ask for comments. That was not done. … Well, Your Honor, to address the first part of your question, was it appropriate under the Administrative Procedure Act to withdraw the moratorium without notice and comment?

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Americredit Financial Services v. Marlene Penrod

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

    And that State law is Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code and State Retail Installment Sales Acts. … It would be outside the 910-day period.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — BASF Corporation v. Johnson Matthey Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

    There's nothing in any of this that says that they are going to act to reduce the NOx. There's nothing in ONO that says you're going to do this. … I guess I'll briefly address just some of the comments that Council made with respect to the 107 patent.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Messerly v. Boehmke

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2014

    But that's the whole purpose of the Disclosure Act. Disclose it if you're the seller. … Just a quick comment. As a matter of personal privilege, Ms.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Encinas v. Tucson Electric

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2003

    Did your client complain about the comments or anything like that? Not about the comments. … These were co-worker comments, right? These were co-worker comments, right. Not supervisor comments. Right, right.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Groff v. DeJoy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

    So it has not been silent when it hasn't liked a definition that we've given something in the Civil Rights Act. In many other acts it remains silent, but not on this one. In Alexander v. … Then maybe we could do a good day's work and put a period at the end of it by saying that that is not the law.

    107 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Green

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2004

    She acted within her authority that was understood to exist pre-Blakely. … Well, we know from Judge Mulway's comment that she was visiting a psychologist.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Ellis

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2026

    The state is not wrong that there are some conflicting comments about what recordings the defense ever received, but there's no question that it received a curated subset of what was gathered. … The final clean copy that went to the jury omitted this instruction.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — John v. Alaska Fish & Wildlife Federation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2011

    It's much more efficient and clean than some sort of an adjudication which would Presumably deal with these matters on a case-by-case river-by-river refuge-by-refuge case Water rights are kind of property … subsistence users when there is a shortage as opposed to the other Individualized allocations So it seems like we cut all those people off from litigating Well, I mean they have a opportunity to for notice and comment

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Louisiana Public Service Comm v. FERC NOTE: Due to technical difficulties, there is a short 3 minute gap in the middle of the audio.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2018

    Normally, that doesn't just spring out of the air. And even if it does, it's initiated by the commission, it would be noticed. … It didn't occur simply because of the long period of time that occurred here. It happened within a very short window of time. Do you know when? I think it was in the late 2000 time period.

    91 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Willie Meche v. Key Energy Services, L.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2014

    What's critical in this situation, really relative to both the issues of maintenance and cure in the case as well as the training that goes towards the negligence issue in the case under the Jones Act, … He said, I keep a clean boat. I said, no oil or grease, no oil or grease. Well, lifting a 100-pound hatch that has a hinge is different from lifting 100 pounds of dead weight.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Agape Motorcoach Retreat, LLC v. Glenda Brintle

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

    to value the property as defined in the condemnation petition and is evaluated by the commissioners, both as to the take and as to the residue and damages thereto, then if the court performs another act … Burns Clean it up I Feel like there's so many questions and so little time If I may I'd like to address the the state Excuse me the private individuals the what we have termed the Boland easement and the

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018

    that at least part of the rules related to the competitive harm piece was a significant change and therefore opened up the comment period to allow people to continue to- Okay, but how are we to decide … It has to have notice and comment. It has to consider and respond to those comments.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Linda Harrell v. Delaware North Companies

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2015

    Delaware North, over a period of time, was trying to determine how best to deal with this circumstance. … They wanted to determine whether they had done the right thing, whether they had acted in a way that was proper within the meaning of the law, whether they had acted in terms of the investigations, in

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Revock v. Cowpet Bay West

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2016

    But before that you have to look at that time period, that very brief time period of what happened when the original request went on file. … That's correct, and there is no dispute that the comments of others on that blog are protected by the Federal Communications Decency Act, I believe is the title.

    37 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.