Documents

Oral argument — AKHTAR v. BURZYNSKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2004

There was a protest, a note given from the American Immigration Lawyers Association pointing out this problem during the comment period, yet 214.15G was still implemented, which limited the period of authorized … Your Honor, I'm — I could comment on all the things that the INS does to make their job more difficult.

Oral argument — Bernard Laborin v. Nancy Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2017

He does not comment on back tenderness or pain, and he only suspects sleep apnea. I want to remind the court that Mr. … However, the record does not establish that these impairments or any others have rendered him disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act.

Oral argument — Diaz v. NTSB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2003

The issue this morning is whether the NTSB acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying my client, Mr. … Then he has a limited period of time to effectively file a notice of appeal. Correct. And he files that notice of appeal with the National Transportation Safety Board.

Oral argument — Garner v. Delta Airlines Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009

Air France. I would have to agree with that. And what specifically, what evidence do you cite that meets the standard of Lindahl? … So we're talking about a period here between 2001 when he engaged in misconduct and 2003 when there were no longer any second officer positions in which he could serve.

Oral argument — Garner v. Delta Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009

Air France. I would have to agree with that. And what specifically, what evidence do you cite that meets the standard of Lindahl? … So we're talking about a period here between 2001 when he engaged in this conduct and 2003 when there were no longer any second officer positions in which he could serve.

Oral argument — JUNIPER NETWORKS v. SHIPLEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2011

Now, Juniper in its papers relies on the theory of continuous act or the fact that this information on the website remained viewable into the limitations period. … on the website represent continuing acts and each one triggers another five year period?

Oral argument — United States v. Scott Sperling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017

And on my standard of review, which you've now agreed to, clear air, I don't know how to go around that. … And Congress, at the same time that it enacts this five-year mandatory minimum in the Adam Walsh Act, also enhances the recidivist penalties for individuals who are charged with the crimes for the same

Oral argument — Burien Nissan, Inc. v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2003

The testimony that you're characterizing was not testimony about physical acts that happened. It was testimony that itself was characterizing transactions, right? … The time period was different. The geographic area was described differently. I mean, not to quibble, but the geographic area was described differently, but essentially the same thing.

Oral argument — United States v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2022

Even on plain air review, this court should reverse Mr. Jones' convictions. This improper testimony from Ms. Jones was extensive. … But didn't they tell the social worker that, at least one of them, that over a period of time, she, that the social worker said that she was very obviously upset about something and acting not normally

Oral argument — Blackman v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2009

Now, at that point, that becomes a discretionary act on their part. But if they see it, they take no notice of it because it's outside of the record. … It's not as if it was ephemeral, that somewhere in the thin air, it was out there somewhere, and they would have had to take judicial notice of it.

Oral argument — Alstom Transportation, Inc. v. FRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2026

And that's not really a False Claims Act misrepresentation. Well, the representation that was made, it's in the Joint Appendix. … The FRA, talking about these technology distinctions that was in response to a comment by a commenter, the FRA's finding was very clearly there are no current domestic manufacturers of 186-mile-per-hour

Oral argument — Kevin Lindke v. James Freed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2024

Freed didn't like the negative comments that were said about him. The Michigan, or excuse me, the U.S. … But at the time this case was being litigated, this was a very, very up in the air issue. There was no test.

Oral argument — NLRB v. VCNCL, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

And they didn't give you notice, employer notice, and the comment was made that—objecting to that and concluding with saying that that's not protected. I don't believe that's a protected act. … Well, the employees are protected in many ways by the National Labor Relations Act. Unless there is a protection on the act, however, the employees do not have the protection of that act.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Dreyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2014

In the time I have available this morning, I want to focus my comments on two issues. First, the misrepresentations in the Church warrant application, and second, the Daubert issue. … And then it says, By a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, and so forth.

Oral argument — Peabody Coal Co. v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2010

The commission tied everything into a comment finding Dr. Cohen to be more credible than all the other medical evidence. And their comment was or finding was Dr. … A man gets a permanent total and within the statutory time period, and then he files under the Occupational Disease Act, you get it dismissed because he's gotten a permanent total for a back injury, and

Oral argument — James Tate, Jr. v. University Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2012

If there are no questions, I have no further comments. No questions here. Thank you. Well, Mr. Ryan read Ms. Silver's comments in response to testimony in response to my questions at the deposition. … Now, the annual operating plans are subject to the Endangered Species Act and the National Environmental Policy Act because they are discretionary agency decisions that may have impacts on the endangered

Oral argument — Cerveceria Modelo de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. CB Brand Strategies, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2024

So Constellation had been selling Modelo products in the United States for a period of time, pursuant to the joint venture. … Don't tell me it was wrong when you don't raise it as air.

Oral argument — People v. Coan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019

It's because Section 9e of the Sexually Dangerous Person Act says so. Now, in the Sexually Dangerous Person Recovery Act, as we have here, neither side may elect to have the case heard by a jury. Mr. … But now this was an issue that was fully aired in front of the jury. Dr. Clouch addressed it in his testimony.

Oral argument — U.S. Bank National Association v. Manzo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2011

Act for rescission. … If we act or we don't act, and you went on that issue, then the bank's in jeopardy because it didn't act within the 20 days. Well, clearly, Your Honor. How do you get between those two lines?

Oral argument — Black Rock Coffee Bar, LLC v. BR Coffee, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2025

They all come to the standard is that we get a fundamentally fair evidentiary hearing, period. That is the gold standard of the arbitration. We were not getting that. … And I know it's a lot to wrangle, but if the court is able to take the time to meticulously go through that, they will see that that clear air standard is not met.