Documents

Oral argument — Garner v. Delta Airlines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009

Air France. I would have to agree with that. And what specifically, what evidence do you cite that meets the standard of Lindahl? … So we're talking about a period here between 2001 when he engaged in this conduct and 2003 when there were no longer any second officer positions in which he could serve.

Oral argument — United States v. Scott Sperling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017

And on my standard of review, which you've now agreed to, clear air, I don't know how to go around that. … And Congress, at the same time that it enacts this five-year mandatory minimum in the Adam Walsh Act, also enhances the recidivist penalties for individuals who are charged with the crimes for the same

Oral argument — Burien Nissan, Inc. v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2003

The testimony that you're characterizing was not testimony about physical acts that happened. It was testimony that itself was characterizing transactions, right? … The time period was different. The geographic area was described differently. I mean, not to quibble, but the geographic area was described differently, but essentially the same thing.

Oral argument — United States v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2022

Even on plain air review, this court should reverse Mr. Jones' convictions. This improper testimony from Ms. Jones was extensive. … But didn't they tell the social worker that, at least one of them, that over a period of time, she, that the social worker said that she was very obviously upset about something and acting not normally

Oral argument — Blackman v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2009

Now, at that point, that becomes a discretionary act on their part. But if they see it, they take no notice of it because it's outside of the record. … It's not as if it was ephemeral, that somewhere in the thin air, it was out there somewhere, and they would have had to take judicial notice of it.

Oral argument — Alstom Transportation, Inc. v. FRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2026

And that's not really a False Claims Act misrepresentation. Well, the representation that was made, it's in the Joint Appendix. … The FRA, talking about these technology distinctions that was in response to a comment by a commenter, the FRA's finding was very clearly there are no current domestic manufacturers of 186-mile-per-hour

Oral argument — Youngv.Martin, et.al

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

And the two guards that are next to him over a period of about four minutes seem to be chatting with each other and joking and laughing during that period. Oh, with each other. … It also relates to other bad acts at other places by other people, not my clients. And as a result, it would be unduly prejudicial in the form of the other bad acts evidence.

Oral argument — Kevin Lindke v. James Freed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2024

Freed didn't like the negative comments that were said about him. The Michigan, or excuse me, the U.S. … But at the time this case was being litigated, this was a very, very up in the air issue. There was no test.

Oral argument — NLRB v. VCNCL, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

And they didn't give you notice, employer notice, and the comment was made that—objecting to that and concluding with saying that that's not protected. I don't believe that's a protected act. … Well, the employees are protected in many ways by the National Labor Relations Act. Unless there is a protection on the act, however, the employees do not have the protection of that act.

Oral argument — Robert Moiser v. Stonefield Josephson, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2015

If I could address first the comments. Talk about restitution. And related to that, the comments about when Mr. Mosher said this fraud was first happening. Mr. … I think in our— Or did you just come in there and throw stuff up in the air?

Oral argument — Peabody Coal Co. v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2010

The commission tied everything into a comment finding Dr. Cohen to be more credible than all the other medical evidence. And their comment was or finding was Dr. … A man gets a permanent total and within the statutory time period, and then he files under the Occupational Disease Act, you get it dismissed because he's gotten a permanent total for a back injury, and

Oral argument — Dianne Khan v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

Khan has satisfied the six-month limitation period contained in Section 2401B. Turning to the two-year limitation period of 2401B, Ms. … It's just a complaint about a government agent acting badly.

Oral argument — Council Treev.USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2010

It's a very important case for the Administrative Procedure Act and for Section 309J of the Communications Act. … period.

Oral argument — Cerveceria Modelo de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. CB Brand Strategies, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2024

So Constellation had been selling Modelo products in the United States for a period of time, pursuant to the joint venture. … Don't tell me it was wrong when you don't raise it as air.

Oral argument — People v. Coan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019

It's because Section 9e of the Sexually Dangerous Person Act says so. Now, in the Sexually Dangerous Person Recovery Act, as we have here, neither side may elect to have the case heard by a jury. Mr. … But now this was an issue that was fully aired in front of the jury. Dr. Clouch addressed it in his testimony.

Oral argument — U.S. Bank National Association v. Manzo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2011

Act for rescission. … If we act or we don't act, and you went on that issue, then the bank's in jeopardy because it didn't act within the 20 days. Well, clearly, Your Honor. How do you get between those two lines?

Oral argument — Reya Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014

But from the evidence the court considered, these remarks were made over a period of what time? Two days. Two days. Yes, sir. … No, but if she acts upon... Your client has to be discriminated against by reason of her race. Correct. All right.

Oral argument — Diaz v. NTSB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2003

The issue this morning is whether the NTSB acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying my client, Mr. … Then he has a limited period of time to effectively file a notice of appeal. Correct. And he files that notice of appeal with the National Transportation Safety Board.

Oral argument — Sarah Eichenberger v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2023

Daniel Talbert on behalf of Kilolo Kijikazi, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. … Well, I mean, what I'm about to say is probably an entirely irrelevant comment, and I apologize for it.

Oral argument — NRDC v. James Perry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018

It's like that if there's a duty, but the statute leaves discretion to the agency, the court at that point can only order the agency to act, but not to take a particular act. … The question is whether or not it is limited, what it can do during this period, to receiving and acting upon errors that are called to its attention.