Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Oral argument — KEYnetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020
They tried to go down that road that there could be intervening acts, and certainly there could be things added within the algorithm because of the comprising language. … But I believe, you know, to address Judge O'Malley's comments about, you know, the period of time, you know, I think the specification clearly teaches that the time has to be short enough to ignore the
34 min of audioOral argument — Thomas Short v. David Berger
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2023
And that is another act. That's a different action, isn't it? It's a different claim. Well, not, not really because those orders are in effect now. … I suppose the court in its discretion could do so with instructions to update the court on a periodic basis.
32 min of audioOral argument — Pavnica v. Veguilla
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2010
traveling He gave him Levaquin at that time which is a broad spectrum antibiotic but it's an antibiotic that only covers for anaerobic bacteria not anaerobic bacteria which is bacteria that doesn't need air … They acted as physicians. But this was after the fact.
31 min of audioOral argument — NH Right to Life v. US Dept. of Health & Human
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2014
New Hampshire was actively looking for alternative health providers in the two-month period prior to HHS awarding this grant in 2011, and it found no one. … So we are acting consistent with that.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Demi Muniz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015
He was totally acting erratically. I mean, he's taking his shirt off, taking his shirt off, putting it back on, saying he's hot, saying he's cold. That's not normal. That's correct, Your Honor. … That was one, that was your penultimate sentence, period. Everything else was based on Parsons, which may be fine.
30 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2005
Was he acting up? Was he talking to himself? Well, I don't think Senequan is going to necessarily make you talk to yourself over a period of time. The question is what you can't see. … One had fired a gun apparently in the air on the Fourth of July. We think that those two are obviously valid and speak for themselves.
32 min of audioOral argument — Thompson Awnings v. Joshua Fullerton
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2018
Judge Kupf aired, he said, well, there's no way Banks could have known about the subsequently diagnosed fractured ribs and the collapsed lung and all that stuff because that happened 15 days after Awning … Sledge, the Eighth Circuit said that the very act of resisting arrest provides probable cause for arrest. Officer Fullerton informed Mr.
31 min of audioOral argument — Kevin Sapp v. Industrial Action Services LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2023
Now, it's mentioned in the Bus Air case that you cite. But wouldn't Kuhn be the biggest? This is governed by federal law, right? It is, yes. … Even though you're using Delaware law as the state law, this is proceeding under the Federal Arbitration Act. And you have to apply federal common law because you have to have a consistent standard.
34 min of audioOral argument — Carey Ebert v. Michael Gustin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019
It was the—he went through the debts of the company as a whole during the period in which Mr. … So they've cited, for example, a claim where a trustee tries to bring a Fair Labor Standards Act claim on behalf of employees to recover their wages that were withheld from them.
52 min of audioOral argument — Contreras v. Board of Ed. City of Chicago
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2023
Counselor, could you pull the mic a little closer because we have the air conditioning back here? I'd be glad to. But it also doesn't amplify you, so you have to keep your voice down. … This is actually an appropriate comment from a teacher. This is not inappropriate.
49 min of audioOral argument — Anita Baldwin v. DOWCP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026
Well, your honor, the act requires to be in and around a coal mining facility during that period of employment. … If we do so in this case, this is a regulation that was promulgated through formal notice and comment rulemaking.
45 min of audioOral argument — East Coast Test Prep LLC v. Allnurses.com, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2019
The movement was largely, almost entirely, basing their motion on the Communications Decency Act. Allnurses argued below the CDA. … And this is very important because this thread was open for such a long period of time because there were some comments, then there was a lull, then there were some comments, then there was a lull and
39 min of audioOral argument — HEALTHCARE UNION v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2005
The ultimate subcontracting happened during the critical period, yes, and the judge certainly looked very closely at that fact. Didn't he make some comments about it? It certainly looks suspicious. … Do you have a comment on that?
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. George Thunderhawk
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017
Stone did get a $30,000 bonus after he became learning solutions consultant for the period September through December 2011. … Nentwig isn't accused of making any racial comments whatsoever. And I also want to point out, with respect to Ms. Wild's comment, that Ms. Wild was the individual who promoted Mr.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020
So not only is the Secretary not limited by the terms of the statute, in practice the Secretary has created the list of offenses without going through the required notice and comment period. … First, Kebido has nothing to do with the Administrative Procedures Act. It's not — it doesn't address it. It doesn't raise it. It's not about notice and comment.
28 min of audioOral argument — James Savina v. Robert Reiser & Company, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2010
Weiss is making that comment to management or not. There's no proof of that. Well, he is the liaison to management. Stop. Do you have any evidence that Mr. Weiss made that comment to management? … Three, whether the comment is related in time and subject matter to the decisional process. And four, whether there are multiple comments or only a single statement.
34 min of audioOral argument — AKHTAR v. BURZYNSKI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2004
There was a protest, a note given from the American Immigration Lawyers Association pointing out this problem during the comment period, yet 214.15G was still implemented, which limited the period of authorized … Your Honor, I'm — I could comment on all the things that the INS does to make their job more difficult.
35 min of audioOral argument — In re: Jackson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2020
There was no such restriction in 2015 in the time period in question. The only other provision that's relevant to this analysis is Section 8.03E. … If I understand it, the complaint is that you're using this to promote and urge the purchase of another product, that it will be coming out within a short period of time.
49 min of audioOral argument — Charter v. USDA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2004
That's the clean test. There's no way they can pass that. … A quick comment on Downs. In traditional compelled speech cases, if the speech, if private speech is being compelled by the government, you stop there. Isn't that correct?
48 min of audioOral argument — Garner v. Delta Airlines Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009
Air France. I would have to agree with that. And what specifically, what evidence do you cite that meets the standard of Lindahl? … So we're talking about a period here between 2001 when he engaged in misconduct and 2003 when there were no longer any second officer positions in which he could serve.
40 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.