Documents

Oral argument — Gomez v. Galman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2021

Yes, they were, they were police officers, but they were not acting with the air of authority of a police officer. So they were police officers. … These officers were on probationary periods. That gets us to Moneo as well as the color of law.

Oral argument — Higgins v. Harrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2013

Counsel, what about Judge Flannel's comments regarding the contract under which your client acted as the manager, that had this penalty, substantial penalty, that would have to be paid to him if the contract … The court did act on it, but it was kind of stop and go during that time period. During 2012 were the defendants appearing pro se? For certain periods of time, yes, they were. Mr.

Oral argument — The Do Corporation v. Shastany

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2016

So this is a very narrow period of time at Whiplash for all these acts of violence to occur. So contrast that with the comparators and what was going on there. … Does that have any, how do you respond to the plaintiff pointing to those comments? I'll take the second one first. The out of town comment was simply a factual comment.

Oral argument — Prairie Farms Dairy v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2026

Sampson said, well, it can take up to, what, 45 minutes or an hour, it was a substantial period of time. … In that case, the employee violated the Illinois statute, which was the Mining Act, which ultimately led to his death.

Oral argument — In the Matter of the Application of the county Collector and Petition of Huff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2009

this notice as being absolutely correct it doesn't exist well it doesn't exist when you say that it was void it's not like we were wrong now if we put the number down and we made something out of the air … investigated gave it to his attorney got a title positive and decided not to redeem had he not received the documents had there been some other facts there that would be fine but he made, after doing all those acts

Oral argument — American Clean Power Assoc v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2021

20-1463 American Clean Power Association Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Mr. Tzabak for the petitioner, Mr. Kennedy for the respondent, Mr. … And at least 21 that have been filed for the retroactive 2015 to 2018 period since the Amelin decision.

Oral argument — Prime Insurance Company v. Darnell Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2022

That used to be called the Motor Carrier Act referenced in the MCS 90. … The kind of argument you seem to be making sounded a lot like the stripe of argument that lost in the Supreme Court in the air transportation case.

Oral argument — John Massey, Jr. v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

The argument that we were making is that, um, a sovereign immunity defense truly attacks the merits of the case and, and it will prevent the merits of the case from being aired in front of the court. … You've got that tolling period because it says without order that allows you to come back with it. So a couple of things, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Johnson v. Bishof

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

Did you want to comment on the negligence? Well, I just was going to follow up on that. Ms. Scott said that Dr. … And in this case, you know, he had already ruled that out because an X-ray and CT showed that the spine was clean. Okay, thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — Rita Bathiard v. Islamic Republic of Iran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2019

So we're giving a 60-day time period for people who live all over the world. … Well, we'll clean that one up if they really wanted to carry it over.

Oral argument — Gustavsen v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 23, 2018

In 1999, FDA proposed a rule to implement Section 116 of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997. That's the statute that adopted this risk-based framework with major changes, moderate and minor changes. … So the FDA proposed a rule in 1999 and it invited notice and comment. It then received 136 comments to which it responded. And it made some revisions to the rule in response to those comments.

Oral argument — Abrahim Fofana v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2021

The government, the judge commented on it in response to the government's inquiry. It was brought up in relation to what he was doing. … Was the question clearly out in the air? Was it open and obvious to everyone? Counsel, let me ask you a question that bothers me here. It's not really brief because it's not relevant.

Oral argument — Kientz v. Commissioner, SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2019

They had to hold the military grade specified by the Secretary of the Army or Air Force who designated the Adjutant General, a military position, as their employer. … Your Honor, some of the comments that Ms. Swaney made just are simply not accurate. While Mr.

Oral argument — Cahokia Unit School District No. 187 v. Pritzker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2021

Under Article 10, explicitly referenced, that amount of money is not pulled out of the air. … It's all there in the Act. But we're not seeking to enforce the Act.

Oral argument — Wanda Rogers v. Bromac Title Services, L.L.C., et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2014

Rogers' case presents one claim, that she was terminated because of her Grand Jury service in violation of the Jury Service Improvement Act. By reason of? … However, nothing occurred during that time period. Nothing occurred that impacted her employment status during that time period.

Oral argument — Estate of Spitler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2023

For those reasons, we believe that the trial court acted beyond the scope of his authority with regard to this complaint for declaratory judgment. … And, you know, the period of time that we were working with there basically was a minimum of six months for the administration of the probate estate.

Oral argument — Janousek v. Slotky

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2012

First, SPSS did not evaluate the LLC Act. It related to a corporation and, moreover, the proper purpose requirement in the LLC Act was added in 1998. … And his 40% and the other stuff is evanescent, up in the air. We get it. Said better than I could.

Oral argument — Qwest Communications Company v. Free Conferencing Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2018

And that covers this same period here. So you say this case does not cover a period post-Farmers II? This case does not. This case, the contract was entered into in 2008. … Minnesota law looks at the restatement, section 766, comment I. And 766 comment I specifically says, it's not necessary that the actor appreciates the legal significance.

Oral argument — Montana Wildlife Federation v. David Bernhardt

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

Period. That's what they do. So how is and the only thing you've told me so far is they can make it less attractive by putting these conditions on. … And it was entirely appropriate for the district court to give BLM a clean slate on remand so that it could, it could apply prioritization accurately.

Oral argument — Soroka v. Silvia Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2008

I submit, Your Honor, the only case law that would be Spitson and Spitson-Sykes-Valdez Act from the Second Circuit. … He was acting on behalf of him. He retained the lawyer on behalf of his son, who was obviously hampered because he was in prison.