Documents

Oral argument — Del Webb Communities, Inc. v. Charles Partington

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2011

As a housekeeping matter, I do want to comment. I did put in my briefing that the July 20, 2010, order on setting aside a stipulation and order was requested to be reviewed. … That's at the crux and the core of the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim and the Lanham Act claim.

Oral argument — Central United Life Insurance v. Sylvia Burwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2016

There is no ambiguous language that has been cited in the Public Health Services Act, or in the Affordable Care Act, that would give HHS authority, any delegated authority, to make a regulation of this … And if I may, just close with one final comment.

Oral argument — Robert Moiser v. Stonefield Josephson, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2015

If I could address first the comments. Talk about restitution. And related to that, the comments about when Mr. Mosher said this fraud was first happening. Mr. … I think in our— Or did you just come in there and throw stuff up in the air?

Oral argument — Dianne Khan v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

Khan has satisfied the six-month limitation period contained in Section 2401B. Turning to the two-year limitation period of 2401B, Ms. … It's just a complaint about a government agent acting badly.

Oral argument — Council Treev.USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2010

It's a very important case for the Administrative Procedure Act and for Section 309J of the Communications Act. … period.

Oral argument — John Doe v. Catholic Relief Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2026

CRS does not, and I think part of the reason goes to some comments Judge Floyd made earlier about commerce. … He cleaned it up, he trained people how to use it, he didn't forward-face, he didn't interact with donors, he did none of those things.

Oral argument — Louisiana Forestry Association Inc Vs. Secretary United States Department of Labor

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 31, 2013

It would be condoning an unlawful act. … So you didn't go through notice and comment to abrogate 2008. Oh, yes we did. Notice and comment to put in place 2011, right? A replacement rule. Right.

Oral argument — Bonnie Kendall v. State of Nevada

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2011

However, even if they were to be considered by the court as part of this ongoing environment, again, they were so ñ they were sporadic comments made over a 20-year period by a couple of different employees … They were individual comments over a period of 20 years. Would that increase the amount of damage recovery? I don't believe it would have an effect on the damage recovery.

Oral argument — Walpole v. Mesa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2005

Judge Callahan, that behavior occurred in the post-relief time period. And those were mere passing glances. … Those acts, coupled with the previous complaints given to Birtling, rise to the – Establish a hostile work environment for the entire period after October 24 through June 2001? No, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Diaz v. NTSB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2003

The issue this morning is whether the NTSB acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying my client, Mr. … Then he has a limited period of time to effectively file a notice of appeal. Correct. And he files that notice of appeal with the National Transportation Safety Board.

Oral argument — Alaska Wilderness League v. Sally Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2015

Is it only good for one year or for a certain period of time? For a certain period of time, the LOAs are. … Okay, so after notice and public comment, the secretary can only allow a specified activity if the secretary, and it says, finds that the total of such taking during each five-year or less period concerned

Oral argument — NRDC v. James Perry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018

It's like that if there's a duty, but the statute leaves discretion to the agency, the court at that point can only order the agency to act, but not to take a particular act. … The question is whether or not it is limited, what it can do during this period, to receiving and acting upon errors that are called to its attention.

Oral argument — Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2012

Seismic is your towing air guns. That has to be done in open water. I understand that what they have as part of their equipment is icebreakers. … But looking out to any five-year period, you don't know where the activities are going to occur. You don't know what the circumstances are going to be.

Oral argument — SEC v. VASSALLO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2005

Did you get a chance to comment on the order? I'm sorry. Yes, Your Honor. It was submitted to you, and you objected to that aspect of the order? Counsel, there's a dispute as to that, Your Honor. … It doesn't come from thin air. Somebody has to cover these expenses.

Oral argument — Smith v. Mahoney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2009

That's why I pulled Nebraska out of thin air. … Smith told him was, I was not drunk or not to the extent that it affected the way I acted. Did Mr. Dorn reasonably rely upon that statement?

Oral argument — Engineering Network International Inc v. Lucent Technologies, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2006

People are retained all the time on the basis of a handshake and comments. Someone may be retained to assist. Microsoft may retain somebody. All right. They bring them in. … That is something that isn't just inferred out of thin air. There has to have been some actual negotiation and agreement on that particular provision. And here there isn't. There's no dispute.

Oral argument — L A Biomedical v. White

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2008

It couldn't have been because it was open air. It wasn't in a vessel. It wasn't in a body. It wasn't the invention as it's intended to be used. So it couldn't have been a reduction to practice. … We commented in our brief at SCR 62, we said this is a newfound desire on their part to have a broad definition.

Oral argument — Carelyn Fylling v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2023

So just to clean up one, I'm sorry that I might have sort of misled this conversation by saying I think it might have been error to keep it out. … So I think that that one comment, I don't think, is necessarily indicative of what point of decision was for the trial court.

Oral argument — Sansone v. Jazz Casino Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021

Horizon because they both involved sexually suggestive comments and no physical touching over a period of months. One case was five months. Another case, it was twice a week over three months. … Santone engaged, which is to say on December 22nd, 2017, she made a written statement of a customer acting inappropriately and making inappropriate comments to her and her termination some nine days later

Oral argument — Moore v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

Lehman's testimony is what is this basis to say these periods when he went to the doctors that examined him clinically said he should remain off work? How can he differ? … Illinois rules of evidence apply except when they conflict the Act. Section 16 of the Act is clear.