Documents

Oral argument — Qwest Communications Company v. Free Conferencing Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2018

And that covers this same period here. So you say this case does not cover a period post-Farmers II? This case does not. This case, the contract was entered into in 2008. … Minnesota law looks at the restatement, section 766, comment I. And 766 comment I specifically says, it's not necessary that the actor appreciates the legal significance.

Oral argument — Wanda Rogers v. Bromac Title Services, L.L.C., et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2014

Rogers' case presents one claim, that she was terminated because of her Grand Jury service in violation of the Jury Service Improvement Act. By reason of? … However, nothing occurred during that time period. Nothing occurred that impacted her employment status during that time period.

Oral argument — Kennett v. Bayada Home Health Care

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2019

But those are issues, those changes are occurring after the time period that's relevant here. … rulemaking that's issued to the public, that invites the public to participate, that explains the agency's reasoning, that includes research, includes a notice and comment period, and that will come forward

Oral argument — United States v. Goldstein

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

What's the sum official act he took? Sure. The official act that he took was to expedite the service of the parfait. … Now, we're not alleging that that's an official act. Introductions certainly aren't an official act.

Oral argument — Smith v. City of Hemet

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2004

, but for another period of time he was. … Or three-counts or seven-counts or however many the prosecutor decided was discreet acts on the part of Mr. Smith. So he doesn't get charged for each time he refuses to put his hands up in the air.

Oral argument — Lesherv.Law Office Of Mitchell N.Kay Pc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2011

He did comment on that. … The problem I have in this case, Your Honor, is Mitchell K doesn't come clean on his role in the process.

Oral argument — Anita Baldwin v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026

Well, your honor, the act requires to be in and around a coal mining facility during that period of employment. … If we do so in this case, this is a regulation that was promulgated through formal notice and comment rulemaking.

Oral argument — East Coast Test Prep LLC v. Allnurses.com, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2019

The movement was largely, almost entirely, basing their motion on the Communications Decency Act. Allnurses argued below the CDA. … And this is very important because this thread was open for such a long period of time because there were some comments, then there was a lull, then there were some comments, then there was a lull and

Oral argument — LEVI v. ROE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2004

It's a very old, well-established case that says that in deliberating, while jurors may act on their own general knowledge and ideas, they cannot act in any case upon particular facts material to its disposition … If he's familiar with that area, he must understand it's not a clean shot. He's got a police car chasing him.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Rankins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2016

Rankin said he wanted to go to trial even after the court made its comments at the December 5th hearing. … I'm sorry, the air pistol. But how did it come up that he had polio? Why would that even come up? Government counsel mentioned it. I know who mentioned it. How did it come up?

Oral argument — American Clean Power Assoc v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2021

20-1463 American Clean Power Association Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Mr. Tzabak for the petitioner, Mr. Kennedy for the respondent, Mr. … And at least 21 that have been filed for the retroactive 2015 to 2018 period since the Amelin decision.

Oral argument — Avery v. GRI Fox Run, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2020

And that's not something that Judge Wheaton came up with out of thin air. That's what's required under the noise ordinance that the plaintiffs are electing to proceed under. … Those specific dates also stated that there was one 24-hour period in which there were over 100 separate violations of the noise ordinance.

Oral argument — James Savina v. Robert Reiser & Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2010

Weiss is making that comment to management or not. There's no proof of that. Well, he is the liaison to management. Stop. Do you have any evidence that Mr. Weiss made that comment to management? … Three, whether the comment is related in time and subject matter to the decisional process. And four, whether there are multiple comments or only a single statement.

Oral argument — Sportsinsurance.com, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

It applies to the entire legal action if they don't bring a lawsuit within the two year period after they discover the loss. … We're told we need to clean up our act about making sure that we've dotted every I and crossed every T, especially about Schedule C's. And she made numerous mistakes on Schedule C's.

Oral argument — Christy Williams v. Tarrant County College Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

, 2, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and 3, the Texas state law equivalent to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Texas Labor Code. … We've touched on pretext, so I'll skip over that except for a couple of comments.

Oral argument — In re: Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2020

There was no such restriction in 2015 in the time period in question. The only other provision that's relevant to this analysis is Section 8.03E. … If I understand it, the complaint is that you're using this to promote and urge the purchase of another product, that it will be coming out within a short period of time.

Oral argument — Charter v. USDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2004

That's the clean test. There's no way they can pass that. … A quick comment on Downs. In traditional compelled speech cases, if the speech, if private speech is being compelled by the government, you stop there. Isn't that correct?

Oral argument — Newman v. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

To build on Judge Kayada's comment, sort of what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. … And I would argue it's possibly up in the air whether it's jurisdictional for the federal courts to then take it until she's done that.

Oral argument — Hilmes v. Germantown Trust and Savings Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022

They acted like it never had been created. Certainly, Sylvester did. And of course, he was the general partner. … We, we, we are entitled to limited partners are entitled to an accounting for whatever the statutory period is, if it's determined to be 10 years, 10 years, if it's determined to be five years, I mean,

Oral argument — Youngv.Martin, et.al

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

And the two guards that are next to him over a period of about four minutes seem to be chatting with each other and joking and laughing during that period. Oh, with each other. … It also relates to other bad acts at other places by other people, not my clients. And as a result, it would be unduly prejudicial in the form of the other bad acts evidence.