Documents

Oral argument — Hispanic Affairs Project v. R. Alexander Acosta

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2018

It's interesting that nobody of the 516 comments that were submitted during the rulemaking proceedings, nobody raised this as an issue, that a 364-day period, a maximum period, would be a problem. … And to allow plaintiffs to come a little over two months after the comment period ends and raise it in court, you know, the whole purpose of notice and comment is to provide the agency an opportunity to

Oral argument — Better Government Ass'n. v. Chicago City Council

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023

So they're very plainly barred by the limitations period. … Just briefly, if I may, I want to address the comments about future injunctive relief.

Oral argument — Markazi v. Peterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2016

Where do you get the notion that Congress can only act by generality? It acts all the time on individual matters. … Period. Constitutional? If not, why not? Scalia. I think that that presents more significant difficulties that are closer to the line that the Chief Justice was pursuing. Breyer.

Oral argument — BMW of North America, LLC v. Theodore & Associates, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020

next unless it's any questions on 1446 well just the one you answered already so I'd like to go to the written description yes the written description issues with respect to 1451 okay there the board aired … upon by the patent owner is a discussion of how you assemble their chassis where they say you suitably couple components together that's not a structure suitable coupling that is essentially a method act

Oral argument — In re: Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2020

There was no such restriction in 2015 in the time period in question. The only other provision that's relevant to this analysis is Section 8.03E. … If I understand it, the complaint is that you're using this to promote and urge the purchase of another product, that it will be coming out within a short period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Maye

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2024

Otherwise, we're just acting based on extrapolation from a projected release date. … So even if we were advancing under a plain air standard of review on this question of law, we would submit that we would win. Judge Williams, at sentencing, heard Mr.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Ness

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2013

However, where was their agreement that they were obligated to pay him for the 20-year period? … If they thought that they needed or expected to continue receiving $1,000 payments while all this was up in the air, they could have done that.

Oral argument — In the Matter of the Application of the county Collector and Petition of Huff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2009

this notice as being absolutely correct it doesn't exist well it doesn't exist when you say that it was void it's not like we were wrong now if we put the number down and we made something out of the air … investigated gave it to his attorney got a title positive and decided not to redeem had he not received the documents had there been some other facts there that would be fine but he made, after doing all those acts

Oral argument — CONTESSA V.BERDEX

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004

It's unlikely that a 15-plus year period is the period that we should be looking at. What should be the period we're looking at? You have other options. One is the time... … I will keep my comments on injunction very brief since they really weren't addressed in the opening argument.

Oral argument — Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2015

Specifically, courts look to the title of the act, provisions in the act stating when the act is supposed to apply, and whether or not it creates an entirely new substantive rule of law or clarifies issues … The record probably did not pick up my air quotes when I indicated the word clarifying, and I was referencing solely the legislature's self-serving, if you will, designation of the amendment as clarifying

Oral argument — In Re Thomas C.Wettach

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 23, 2015

But the $1.2 million would account for all four years, and all four years did not fall within the look-back period because of this. But there had to be a 48-month period there, counsel. … There has to be a four-year period. There was a 48-month period. There's no question about that.

Oral argument — In re The Commitment of Shanks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2016

That would be our argument, Your Honor, because otherwise you are taking a situation where acts when someone's less than 16, that the criteria says, we don't know if this was an adult comment, these may … These were acts when he was a minor. He was under 16 years of age. They can't give you the six-month period. The 2004 conviction doesn't meet the criteria. But then consider the 2010 conviction.

Oral argument — United States v. Darryl Rollins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015

Most commentary, most substantive commentary goes through the comment and notice period and is submitted to Congress. That is in the commission's own rules. … It went through in 2003 the full notice and comment period. It was submitted to Congress and it was added to the definition of crime of violence.

Oral argument — Tiffany and Company v. Costco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2020

Johnson, who used the pine tree shape for its plug-in air fresheners, was using it descriptively. … It's clear under federal law that there's no punitive damages for violations of the Lanham Act. And I'll look forward to answering any additional questions in my rebuttal period.

Oral argument — Sevag Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2022

And those private attorneys general are acting as representatives of the state in this. … When you know that another case has a substantial overlap with your case, as recognized by this court in Air California in Smith v. March, don't wait.

Oral argument — Martin v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018

And everybody else whose claims were already pending is suggesting that Congress should have stepped in and said, okay, you have to devote all your resources to cleaning up your backlog. … The rant letter you offered him gives him nothing that would expedite his BVA decision from the period of time when it has been certified to the period of time when there will be a decision.

Oral argument — In re Couch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2016

That issue goes to the question of this Consumer Protection Act. … But I would agree that it would put an undue burden on us to kind of reinvent out of air some affidavit that shows definitively that what his allegations are true.

Oral argument — Intuit v. FTC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2024

The ads that were shown in the 2020 copy test were not the ads that were actually aired. And in particular, they didn't include all of the disclosures. … There is no case cited in the briefs that rejects our Article III argument, period. If there are others, we'll be happy to discuss them when they bring them forward. Mr.

Oral argument — Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2026

But that interpretation is not supported by the regulations or by the Food Act. … With respect to the acceptable dose intake, one very clean way understand why what they were trying to propose was not adequate is that the agency identified that there are studies of the phthalate that

Oral argument — Cahokia Unit School District No. 187 v. Pritzker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2021

Under Article 10, explicitly referenced, that amount of money is not pulled out of the air. … It's all there in the Act. But we're not seeking to enforce the Act.