Documents

Oral argument — Council For Urological Interes v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2014

This is a circumstance in which Congress intended to empower the secretary to act against program or patient abuse. … Four years later, in 2013, the agency refused to give the guidance on the basis that it didn't get enough comments, and the comments were not unanimous as far as the recommended course of action.

Oral argument — Heck v. Estate of Thomas J. Heck, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 26, 2019

But as the comment indicates, when you make your demand 29 years after the note was made, and it's a family issue, it creates issues of fact that almost can never be resolved after that period of time. … Urban, which is not an Illinois case, but follows up on that comment 2. And cites comment 2 in the context of a family dispute.

Oral argument — PSSI Global Services, L.L.C. v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

My argument will focus on two statutes, Section 316 of the Communications Act and the Orbit Act. I will address them in turn. … of proof before the commission they tried to throw in a bunch of additional post order evidence in connection with their stay motion which this court denied in the form of declarations which tried to clean

Oral argument — Handal v. Innovative Industrial Properties Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2025

In there, the makers of the statements are culpable and they act with scienter under a vial. So the question is, does that bad faith that they exhibit between April 14th and May 5th carry back? … Now, putting aside whether recklessness is the standard, which is, I guess, up in the air. Putting aside. Not challenged it. Back to Blue Orca into what you just said.

Oral argument — John Ingram v. Vivus Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2015

Well, the bottom line vote and also the comments of the FDA committee members who looked at and interpreted the data. … And it specifically doesn't suffice when it's based entirely on hindsight comments made by members of the Advisory Committee panel at the end of the class period.

Oral argument — People v. Hampton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2024

So, it is true that the Armed Provisional Criminal Statute is silent on mental state, but the Possession as a Voluntary Act Statute states that possession is a voluntary act if the offender knowingly procured … If a person is acting with intent, they are acting with knowledge.

Oral argument — L.C. v. Alta Loma School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020

I mean, throughout that period of time, the district is saying, we'll pay for it. Here's what our limits are. Here's our policy. … This was a simple isolated act. Act. This was not a remedy that student requested. Student did not obtain prevailing party. Staff and therefore should not have been awarded any attorney's fees.

Oral argument — Republic Technologies (NA), LL v. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2024

On the federal false advertising claims under the Lanham Act, the public won jury verdicts under the Illinois Deceptive Trade Practices Act for statements that were misleading and confusing to consumers … If the judge says we're going to go back to square one and clean slate, it creates some doubt, but where the court says, I've heard your objection. I don't need to hear anything more about it.

Oral argument — Banner Health v. Thomas Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2017

Period. Not anything having to do with the 50 versus the 123, but just period. … in any prior period.

Oral argument — United States v. Floyd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020

Anyway, my comment really goes to the idea that it'll be okay. People will not penalize him for it. … And I don't think prosecution can point to any violent acts that he committed. And again, nothing at night.

Oral argument — SOLA v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

There was a formal process for taking comments on the guidance. The appellants here, in fact, made extensive submissions to those regulatory agencies. … So immediately contemplates some period of time, a reasonable period of time under the circumstances, may be hours, may be days, may be weeks, may even be months, but there's a period of deferment.

Oral argument — People v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

And so, the third reason that the court aired here is that it found that no one knew what would have happened inside the car besides the defendant and Williams. … Talking about the fact that defendant acted in self-defense.

Oral argument — United States v. James Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2013

As this Court has previously articulated, the act— With respect to the Speedy Trial Act, I thought your argument was a Barker v. Wingo violation argument. … Judge Quarles mentioned the backup time issue at page 999 of the Joint Appendix, and it was in response, I believe, to a comment from Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Bowline

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2018

Bowline was exposed to, dramatically increased penalties, 88 years instead of the 25 under the drug conspiracy and the travel act. … Just so we can get a clean record on this point, footnote 5, I understand from your brief that footnote 5 in Vance establishes that Vance actually is holding that Burke continues to be the law.

Oral argument — United States v. Waldemar Lorenzana-Lima

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2021

And the court's comments at the time, respectfully, raise that issue. … I'm not sure which the court was referring to on the air. So that could be that's really part of the confusion and ambiguity.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Midland County

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2024

Heck did not, was not out of thin air. There were five principles that led to Heck's holding. The first holding, I'm sorry, the first principle is that Section 1983 is a species of tort liability. … And clearly at that point, there would be no question under McDonough, under all the other cases, that she would have the applicable limitations period to bring her claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Bergrin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2021

And so we're talking now the 2012-2013 time period, and he refused because he was afraid that we would retaliate against him because he was a cooperator. … If ever there were a case where, partly because of the stakes, there should have been a full evidentiary hearing and all this should have been aired out, this is the one.

Oral argument — 21-2439_Gonzalez v. State of NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2023

That's the period where they are involved with this family. … It's individualized knowledge in whether or not the individuals acted reasonably.

Oral argument — United States v. Cook

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2008

And it would be air to assume that, as counsel does, I submit, that the four jurors or, indeed, that any of the jurors believe that they did not have verdicts as to some counts when they responded to the … And the judge comments, this is at ER587, third no.

Oral argument — Charles Bellon v. The PPG Employee Life and Other Benefits Plan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2022

that act. … And and that that act was a waiver of their of a contractual right. That was it.