Documents

Oral argument — Timothy Kemp v. Wendy Kelley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2017

But at the time, there was the 1993 Public Defender Act, which provided that reasonable expenses should be paid by the county in any case. … And with those three broad considerations, which I think each of which Judge Marshall brought to bear to explain why while fetal alcohol effects might have been in the air, there was not a basis to do

Oral argument — Robert Graham v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2022

We don't feel that it was acted on until I appeared and asked for extra time. … Graham's attorneys to treat this period, this 60-day period during which they're in active communication back and forth – I mean, they're not just sleeping and doing nothing – to treat this as, listen,

Oral argument — Joanne Ogden v. Public Utility Dist. No. 2

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2018

If you take the absences that constitute a reasonable accommodation or protected leave under the Family Medical Leave Act. … I didn't mean to, that came off a bit flip, my comment there.

Oral argument — Branch Banking and Trust Co v. Pacific Life Ins Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2015

I think any distinction here between us admitting ever that they were the owner is really hot air. So what is the difference between an assignee and an owner in this context? … Remember throughout this entire period until they signed that form and benefit was fully in effect.

Oral argument — Orkin v. Albert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

In terms of the permanent injunction, we ask that the court lift the permanent injunction, because the district court erred when it found that under the All Writs Act and the Anti-Injunction Act, that … Because the issue of equitable ownership is still up in the air. I kind of view those as two separate buckets of reasons given by the federal court in issuing the injunction.

Oral argument — Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, a division of the Rail Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers v. Federal Railroad Administration and United States Department of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2019

And I thought you agreed that the Hobbs Act is not an actual notice statute for triggering the 60-day limitation period, correct? Yes, Your Honor. Textually, you just have to let that one go. Yes. … I think this court said in energy probe that attaching the petition within the 60-day limitations period was a jurisdiction.

Oral argument — United States v. Benjamin McChesney

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2015

She says, I heard this comment. There were jurors within earshot of this comment. The comment itself is one that it seems to me would be quite troublesome if jurors heard it. … This lawyer who you said was retained the day of the verdict, he didn't, he didn't, he didn't act from, from what we see. He didn't act diligently about it. At least that's a conclusion I could draw.

Oral argument — Theodor Atanuspour v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2023

So this appeal raises an issue that comes up often in disability cases, whether that's under the Social Security Act or in cases like this under ERISA, because both of the cases involve waiting periods … Vahedofar's comments? Right. I've got a notation here about him noting, or Dr.

Oral argument — Terkel v. Centers for Disease

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2021

Your Honor, I don't think that possibility exists here, to think that another agency would act. … We don't think that the court could act here because this case is moot.

Oral argument — State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Beatriz Muse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2021

He also renewed the ACCA licensing and ACCA gave them a clean bill of health. If there was any violation, ACCA would have brought that to his attention. … They need to prove that they acted with due diligence.

Oral argument — Snohomish County, Washington v. STB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2020

There was a period of time to create all of these. … I will comment briefly on the merits, and then I would like to address very briefly the standard question. You've got two minutes.

Oral argument — United States v. Karen Sarkissian

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2018

think that we have a number of winning arguments, both on the substantive counts and that sentencing, ultimately, at the end of the day, the Barabin issue as it applies to Special Agent Keith Koontz is clean … Period. Correct. That is the – And I appreciate that your position was the intended amount. That's not here. I don't have the judge commenting on that actually at all.

Oral argument — Southwestern Management, Inc. v. Ocinomled, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2016

Since 1970, Congress has amended the Lanham Act in ways that augment the policy. … Those aired all over the country. We put in evidence of how many people saw them, and this is just the beginning. He went on his Sirius radio show. He talked about his Delmonico restaurants.

Oral argument — Jeffrey Swaters v. DOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2016

Well, the DOT engaged in its own NPRM process and asked the stakeholders in the industry to comment, and they all commented. … Because the presumption is the agency acts properly. Its regulations say it can't release this. It's just totally discretionary. You can't test for DNA.

Oral argument — State of Vermont v. MPHJ Technology Investments

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2015

and the BCPA Act. … Well, the state has moved for reconsideration, and so that's up in the air, but he did keep it for now, subject to the motion for reconsideration. So what would happen were you to...

Oral argument — United States v. Kaufman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2023

Kauffman, he has to be corruptly acting at the credit union in exchange for that thing of value. So for bribery in the Stevenson case, I understand the logic. … They repeated interest rates and amortization period in their letters pretrial.

Oral argument — Smith v. City of Hemet

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2004

, but for another period of time he was. … Or three-counts or seven-counts or however many the prosecutor decided was discreet acts on the part of Mr. Smith. So he doesn't get charged for each time he refuses to put his hands up in the air.

Oral argument — United States v. Goldstein

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

What's the sum official act he took? Sure. The official act that he took was to expedite the service of the parfait. … Now, we're not alleging that that's an official act. Introductions certainly aren't an official act.

Oral argument — Christy Williams v. Tarrant County College Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

, 2, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and 3, the Texas state law equivalent to the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Texas Labor Code. … We've touched on pretext, so I'll skip over that except for a couple of comments.

Oral argument — HILFINGER-DOWELL v. ASTRUE

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2007

At the end of that period, the October 2002 period, he was fainting just sitting in a computer class. And what we think that evidence suggests is that Mr. … The standard for assessing disability under the Social Security Act is twofold.