Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Oral argument — Brooke Henderson v. Springfield R-12 School District

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

    What did it mean when it said in the materials that if people didn't act professionally, then they'd be asked to leave and denied credit for the training? What does it mean to act professionally? … I didn't know that you perceived my comment as derogatory, but you did. It's the same thing. And so I could be accused of discriminating.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Consiglio v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

    Specifically, the Medical Practice Act provides a mandatory, this is back in 1999, a mandatory three-year limitations period and a five-year repose period related to Dr. … And this new legislation in a different act isn't doing anything but disciplining these licenses. Last comment I'll make, and I'm sure counsel will cover it.

    60 min of audio
  • Oral argument — San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. NRC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2010

    It prepared a supplemental liais, it put that out for comment, it reviewed comments, it responded to comments, put out a final liais. The commission then held an adjudicatory proceeding. … If there ever were any kind of release of radioactivity into the air, it would settle quickly on land. And as it moved downwind, it would be dispersed.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Natural Resources Defense v. Ross

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

    It waived the five-year exemption period. The regulation is in effect right now and it has been all along, but the five-year exemption period has been waived by the government of Mexico. … And this was the appellee's own comment.

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Munizzo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

    Now, comments cited Waterford Executive Group v. … Comment solution to this problem would say, just file the claim sooner. Seek adequate time to seek leave of court to file the motion.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hanwha Azdel, Inc. v. C&D Zodiac, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2015

    Asdell's air light sheets were literally shipped to Crane for use in developing its product, 969-972. … They've been working on it for a long period of time. Let me speak really briefly. I've got almost no time left. I want to speak briefly about the confidentiality.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Keiser-Long v. Owens

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015

    I'm airing a case 30 years ago in Cook County at 26th Street. There was a case where some guys jumped the fellow at the CHA in the south side and beat him up. It was a fairly simple mugging. … If they've got key individuals, they take out insurance policies to protect them from lost income so they can weather the storm during those periods. They didn't do that here.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Newport Township Road District v. Pavelich

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2012

    He couldn't clean the debris from the road because he had no money to pay his employees. He had vendors who would no longer do business with him. … Then how are we supposed to review something that he was not required nor did comment on? Because he failed to look at it.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jennifer Rieman v. Evraz, Inc. NA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2020

    To the extent you're referring to the later period when she took the leave, I thought everybody assumed initially that she had leave, that she was eligible for leave. … That doesn't mean that in her case it could have been, you know, she took extensive family leave act time over a period of years that is, you know, they could have just gotten tired of it, you know.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Gough

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2016

    On the other hand, we are not here today saying to the court, here's a ten and a half year period of time for you to look at, and if you look at all that period of time, the period of time attributable … Gamzee's report, and the only period that we've included as saying that it's a delay that weighs against the state is the period between the date that Dr.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rimac v. Duncan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2008

    After all, the state doesn't have to act. It allows someone to act under the color of state law. No agreement is required. … One of the comments which caught my ear earlier was the plaintiff's counsel saying that the chief can't say, I'm not involved, and he should have stepped back and not done anything in this dispute.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Southwestern Management, Inc. v. Ocinomled, Ltd.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2016

    Since 1970, Congress has amended the Lanham Act in ways that augment the policy. … Those aired all over the country. We put in evidence of how many people saw them, and this is just the beginning. He went on his Sirius radio show. He talked about his Delmonico restaurants.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jeffrey Swaters v. DOT

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2016

    Well, the DOT engaged in its own NPRM process and asked the stakeholders in the industry to comment, and they all commented. … Because the presumption is the agency acts properly. Its regulations say it can't release this. It's just totally discretionary. You can't test for DNA.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kendall v. Collins

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025

    It's not like you can just pull out a thin air. Well, I don't like this, so I think it's unreasonable. And because I've made that determination, now I can look at factors to substantiate it. … Not at this time, Your Honor, but if you would allow me to think on it, and if I could have just a short rebuttal period, then I'd be happy to try to answer that question more effectively.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Matros v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2013

    But that means that violations of the act that are short of the termination are still covered by the act. So he has a right to delect that remedy, that their reaction to his injury. … What about the period of time where he's claiming that he's working on these feeder maps but he's on the floor of the truck examining these apparently for over an hour at a time?

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Loucks v. Red Dot Construction

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2015

    Clair County he said I remember back in the 90s my dad did some crane work back when my dad was alive we did some crane work out in Scott Air Force Base I know that I buy a part for my back home from a … where are you coming up with that and every time we try to ask you where you're coming up with it it gets more and more confusing because either you're the the president is reckless in the way that he's acting

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Paul Moriconi v. Travis Koester

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2016

    But prior, almost immediately before trial, newspaper articles were given to the plaintiff, which alleged 37 prior tasings, two lawsuits, comment by the federal, in the newspaper, comment by the federal … Well, that's not the case that we're dealing with here, period.

    9 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2024

    So, how do you square that with the periodic check that Arizona wants to do? … It's really an administrative process of cleaning the file. So thank you.

    69 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. NORRIS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2005

    But she does not say anything about the summer or any period of time. All right. So that at least corroborates that she had been in his home at other times. Okay. … But that, that instance also supports the defendant's confessions to all three of these acts. And if the Court has nothing.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Waithaka v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020

    those three rules that I articulate from the Supreme Court, is that if you're engaged in long-distance transportation services, if those are your activities, so seamen, railroad employees, commercial air … aren't you left with language in Section 12 which would read, the interpretation of this agreement is governed by the laws of the state of Washington without regard to its conflict of law principles, period

    34 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.