Documents

Oral argument — Peter Nygard v. John Dipaolo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2018

We said an alternative holding would not air no Mystery what you said is the court reversed the some of this motion Even if it were to assume that the district court understood the proper standing there … I I'm beyond my expertise your honor and commenting on let me Drill down a few a moment though. You've made a big point about witnesses are key here. Correct? Yes.

Oral argument — Annette Williams v. Texas Children's Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

Where is the discriminatory act other than this direct evidence you claim? … What is the discriminatory act? The discriminatory act is the termination. Okay. What's the discriminatory reason for the termination?

Oral argument — Administrative Commission v. Rhee

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2012

That's not something he just pulled out of thin air. He looked at the church doctrine. … The first relates to counsel's comments on this lack of authority argument.

Oral argument — Viasat, Inc. v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2021

It stops there The problem is that AT&T In the comments And reply comments below Had offered the agency Such a reason. … It doesn't say anything about how much Illumina Is necessary to act as a Catalyst to facilitate those reactions.

Oral argument — United States v. Eduardo Munoz-Camarena

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2010

He was saying, I've got to demonstrate to this person the consequences of his acts. And a revolving door is not doing it. I mean, that's a pretty clear explanation, I think. … But even if you take all that into account and you still say that some incremental increase is necessary, the district court picked the 24-month number that he chose out of thin air.

Oral argument — Top Set Int'l, Inc. v. Neufeld

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2008

Throughout the revocation process, the company, Topset, continued to request that the agency comment on that. … Air attacks versus MGA Entertainment.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Bradshaw

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2019

Fisher, we note that you are appointed on appeal under the Criminal Justice Act, and the Court appreciates your assistance. Thank you, Your Honor. As I'm sure Mr. Bradshaw does. Thank you. … To address the government's comments regarding the scheduling, yes, it was true that Judge Lange did move off based on prior information that Mr.

Oral argument — Wolfe v. City of Anaheim

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2008

First, this court is not bound by the pronouncements of the state court on Sherman Act claims, which it never had made. It never had jurisdiction under the Sherman Antitrust Act, period. … I think four formal applications over a period from 1998 through and overlapping onto the franchise period because they didn't have the option at that point of applying.

Oral argument — Blanche, Acting Atty Gen. v. Lau

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2026

And then there'll be periodic check-ins, rarely, if ever, longer than 90 days. … I don't know that it really makes sense to just pull probable cause out of the air and import it.

Oral argument — 21-2439_Gonzalez v. State of NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2023

That's the period where they are involved with this family. … It's individualized knowledge in whether or not the individuals acted reasonably.

Oral argument — United States v. Cristobal Velasquez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

Calciano, he committed racketeering acts that constituted interference with interstate or foreign commerce? Yes, Your Honor. So racketeering acts sounds like it includes others, not just him, right? … And when you're talking about Doyle error, one of the factors is whether it was a spontaneous comment by the witness or a comment prompted by the prosecutor.

Oral argument — Toll Brosvs Century Surety Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Haas did not come out of thin air. … She says, in her order, fine, you HAS have no rights against Essex, period.

Oral argument — Lilit Hovhannisyan v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2019

There's no factual there's nothing in the record that shows that her notario was representing her in the critical time period. She never states it. … That's such a weak argument, particularly since Congress usually acts if it's going to act when somebody's complaining about, particularly the government whose views the Congress sometimes takes note of

Oral argument — Slagley v. Slagley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2012

Slackley, had, pursuant to Section D1N of the Adoption Act, evidenced intent to forego his parental rights as manifested by his failure to communicate for a period of 12 months. Period. … But D.L. commented on time limits in the various sections of the Adoption Act. And we've discussed that in the brief.

Oral argument — Branch Banking and Trust Co v. Pacific Life Ins Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2015

I think any distinction here between us admitting ever that they were the owner is really hot air. So what is the difference between an assignee and an owner in this context? … Remember throughout this entire period until they signed that form and benefit was fully in effect.

Oral argument — Orkin v. Albert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

In terms of the permanent injunction, we ask that the court lift the permanent injunction, because the district court erred when it found that under the All Writs Act and the Anti-Injunction Act, that … Because the issue of equitable ownership is still up in the air. I kind of view those as two separate buckets of reasons given by the federal court in issuing the injunction.

Oral argument — United States v. Lin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2006

The journalist was just asserting it in the air. … Would the United States like to comment? Good morning. Barbara Vallier on behalf of the United States.

Oral argument — Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, a division of the Rail Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers v. Federal Railroad Administration and United States Department of Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2019

And I thought you agreed that the Hobbs Act is not an actual notice statute for triggering the 60-day limitation period, correct? Yes, Your Honor. Textually, you just have to let that one go. Yes. … I think this court said in energy probe that attaching the petition within the 60-day limitations period was a jurisdiction.

Oral argument — Theodor Atanuspour v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2023

So this appeal raises an issue that comes up often in disability cases, whether that's under the Social Security Act or in cases like this under ERISA, because both of the cases involve waiting periods … Vahedofar's comments? Right. I've got a notation here about him noting, or Dr.

Oral argument — United States v. Hector Soto-Zuniga

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2016

I mean, they're challenging the conduct of NCIS under the Posse Comitatus Act. … Defense has to be entitled to receive discovery to engage in air quotes because there's no meaningful opportunity to cross-examine.