Documents

Oral argument — Quinn Heath v. Indianapolis Fire Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2018

By adding a temporal limit to the ambiguous term employee, the court aired warranting reversal. First, employee is an ambiguous term in the False Claims Act. … Could I have your comment on Ms. Delaney's analogy to the Farbins-Oxley Act? Candidly, the language is similar in some ways.

Oral argument — Kristen Barnett v. INOVA Health Care Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2024

They're just, period. They will not. This is not that case. The vaccine was not prohibited. So, because you, we know that the exemption, can you tell me why this gets even at this stage? … But it has to lead to why she can't do this act that an employer is requiring, doesn't it? Yeah.

Oral argument — Jane Roe v. Marshall University Board of Governors

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2025

The bottom line is that in each of these cases, in every case that I've looked at in the course of reviewing this, substantial control requires some official authority or act. … This student had a clean record, had never been in trouble in the past, and was simply a one-off incident that occurred in this particular instance for which they had become aware of at that particular

Oral argument — Sharese Wells v. Cullen Talton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2017

He'd been wandering around in the woods for some period of time since he ran out the back of the house. So you're talking about the telephone. You're talking about the phone. … Everything that was in the record shows that Deputy Glidden acted reasonably under the circumstances. You're talking about the record at the time of the summary judgment motion?

Oral argument — Dennis Fusaro v. Michael Cogan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

But our argument, and it's really important, that this segregation of the access and the content prongs are not as clear or not as clean as the court below meant to make it up. … Do you think Maryland could say there's a public square, if you will, and people periodically stand there and they speak their mind about politics or whatever they want to talk about?

Oral argument — Fairchild v. Coryell Cty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

And that's that 45-minute period of where she bangs six minutes continuously on the door. Lovelady stops by at 8.02.51, and then she takes eight additional minutes. … Yes, the evidence was that she threw probably some sort of quick cleaning solution out the food slot at him as he was going by.

Oral argument — United States v. JERRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2007

Leatherwood had testified that he had no contact with the Defendant during this period of time, any time after the year 2000. … But it certainly allows the inference that it preceded the amended returns and the coming clean of the defendant.

Oral argument — Nampa Classical Academy v. William Goesling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

And in particular, in this case, where the state acting as sovereign has excluded those materials from the curriculum. … Well, it is telling, because they didn't say that the charter school is a government entity, period.

Oral argument — Trustees Main 270 LLC v. ApplianceSmart Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2026

Like in a negligence case, somebody act reasonably. You would always give that to a jury, wouldn't you? … During that period of time, that space is vacant.

Oral argument — Center for Food Safety v. Andrew Wheeler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2022

So turning first to this issue of notice and comment. … the typical comment period is about 30 days so if this court asked the agency under C4 to put the studies up for public comment you know that is also probably we're looking at a handful of months I would

Oral argument — United States v. Rafael Parsadanyan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

But then the government repeatedly introduced unnoticed prejudicial other acts, which even in the brief they don't call other acts, but which were evidence of other crimes that Mr. … Parcedanian had been sent to clean it up and to erase evidence, to destroy the evidence. But that was the one piece of evidence that remained, if we assume the jury followed the instructions.

Oral argument — Ekinciler Demir v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

Because what we're talking about is the cost of production for this period over the year, this period of time, 2004-2005. … I don't want to interrupt, but you're saying over the period of review should have been depreciated over some other period?

Oral argument — People v. Yang

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2013

Period. … They're mine from defense counsel's comments or trial counsel's comments to the court.

Oral argument — Kelly Matherne v. Ruba Management

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2015

Matherne got beaten up and bruised There had been innumerable prior complaints that had just been blown off and not acted on But let me address the last complaint Because what the evidence shows was that … Hyatt Says, what in the world are you ladies doing That's causing the men to act like this That's no investigation That's blaming the victim And Ms.

Oral argument — In re Express Scripts Holdings

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2019

This read to me more like a 1933 Act and a 1934 Act complaint, because you point to different allegations. … They absolutely could have declined to comment, but that's not what they did. They made selective comments, making it seem as if everything was going well in this negotiation.

Oral argument — 1-19-2196

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

And we would urge this court to affirm because the trial court did not air by granting judgment in favor of GTX and Ms. Santra Sola. Mr. … And lastly, the comment about the plaintiff didn't agree what was in her personnel file.

Oral argument — Nalini Kapur v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020

And the first thing that OTA did upon acquiring the license was throw them out of the station and take them off the air. So, you know, this the injury is not limited to the loss of that investment. … I understand the time period, Mr. Corbett, the perspective from which we evaluate your client's standing.

Oral argument — Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Casden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2026

And during after that period, while that's going on, our law clerks will speak to the students and talk about being a law clerk and whatever they want to talk about, and their judges or whatever. … I think it should get affirmed just to have a clean record because there's no application for the Noor-Pennington. I know that Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Abukar Beyle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2015

And I can tell you this, and then you can comment on it, so I'll be a question. All right. … Which would provide an almost complete sanctuary for any kind of acts of piracy within 200 miles of the Somali coast?

Oral argument — Lakshmi Injeti v. United States Citizenship

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2013

He says in this law that bad acts has to be elevated to being a criminal act with intent. … We know there's mens rea in perjury, period.