Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.33s
Oral argument — United States v. Randly Begay
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2022
And why wouldn't a defendant have to be aware of potential victims before he can act with indifference toward them? … Do you have any final comments in the 14 seconds or do you reserve? I can probably give you two minutes for rebuttal. I would just like to note that the ball is in Congress's court.
62 min of audioOral argument — Murchison Captl Partners, L.P. v. Nuance Co
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2015
Period, yes. And then I would say... Then would you say, okay, second, alternatively, there's a defined and clear exception to finality, and it's the Grinberg Rule. … So does that mean when the arbitration panel cleans up this issue and issues its ruling, there would also be... And if it's in your favor, that there'd be issue preclusion?
46 min of audioOral argument — People v. Cearlock
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2010
It comes from the Probate Act. Where in the Probate Act? I don't know specifically. … It has to be provided for by the act. It's not provided for by the act. In 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court carved out a limited exception to this lack of reimbursement.
65 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Meredith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2012
I think this court's case law actually allows for an even broader time period... … Well, then does that intervening act somehow attenuate the time period problem? I don't think so, because the... Again, to stick with this example...
72 min of audioOral argument — David Dixon v. City of St. Louis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019
Should the district court have given the state court a chance to clean up their acts, so to speak? If you look at the transcript, John, the district judge did ask about this. … And then it takes at least, you know, another period of time to brief a writ of mandamus.
41 min of audioOral argument — Flood v. Bank of America Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2014
It was one comment. I understand, Your Honor. However, what the court focused on was it was an abusive comment. … periods of time when they were supposed to be on the phones.
36 min of audioOral argument — Kane County v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2023
Is that a fair comment? I mean, I guess you should ask them. I think we've been able to deal with them well in our litigation dealings. … But if the court says there was a 10 foot roadway, correct, 2477 or 77 right of way, the question of scope is still up in the air, isn't it?
44 min of audioOral argument — IN RE: Petrobras Securities
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2016
Imagine hypothetically you were an investor sitting in Buenos Aires having purchased these notes. … It had a market capitalization of nearly $16 billion during the class period.
51 min of audioOral argument — D'Este v. Bayer Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2009
The slate is even more clean when it comes to California law. That tally I just gave you is a mix of Federal and California law cases. … And so the, the fact that we would have to put off for a considerable period of time of decision, I think, would, would tend to impair the development of the law to some degree.
67 min of audioOral argument — People v. Clark
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2016
on that, the court denied the motion to disqualify without comment or argument from either side. … And the trial and, and trial counsel, we, I, I guess we offered the ability for everybody to air and nobody took us up on it.
43 min of audioOral argument — Strawbridge v. Schafer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2015
The court acted properly. There was no genuine issue of material fact in this case. By the end of 2000, there was nothing. We've got this ground. … And I'm reminded of that in listening to counsel today talk about, well, I'm not sure, well, we have these deeds and different legal descriptions and it's still kind of up in the air.
45 min of audioOral argument — Brenda Robinson v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2016
Your Honor, if we look to Utah and if we look to Aragon, which is the appellate court that has interpreted the Utah Products Liability Act, and we look to what that court relied upon, that court relied … upon North Coast Air Services v.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Carlos Solorio
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2011
This is police officers transmitting over a police radio a formal act, police officers taking notes on what is being said over the radio. We don't even have a recording of what was said. … Two people had opened it sometime during that time period, but no explanation of who. And there seemed to be a significant weight loss.
28 min of audioOral argument — Unuva Shuler v. City of Los Angeles
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2021
So this this this exercise by plaintiffs and sort of pulling things out of thin air giving partial parts of a record using criminal a criminal context and somehow influence a civil context. … that's right and I think there is a very clear and well understood difference between what is presented to a judge whether it be probable cause, a bench trial or some other instance in which the judge is acting
27 min of audioOral argument — Peter Nygard v. John Dipaolo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2018
We said an alternative holding would not air no Mystery what you said is the court reversed the some of this motion Even if it were to assume that the district court understood the proper standing there … I I'm beyond my expertise your honor and commenting on let me Drill down a few a moment though. You've made a big point about witnesses are key here. Correct? Yes.
30 min of audioOral argument — Annette Williams v. Texas Children's Hospital
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019
Where is the discriminatory act other than this direct evidence you claim? … What is the discriminatory act? The discriminatory act is the termination. Okay. What's the discriminatory reason for the termination?
37 min of audioOral argument — Administrative Commission v. Rhee
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2012
That's not something he just pulled out of thin air. He looked at the church doctrine. … The first relates to counsel's comments on this lack of authority argument.
35 min of audioOral argument — Viasat, Inc. v. FCC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2021
It stops there The problem is that AT&T In the comments And reply comments below Had offered the agency Such a reason. … It doesn't say anything about how much Illumina Is necessary to act as a Catalyst to facilitate those reactions.
122 min of audioOral argument — Norma Chavez Olivera v. William Barr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2019
And the fact that she actually took action and disclosed it to the Human Rights Commission and to the public administration, the investigator in the Attorney General's office, it is a whistleblowing act … During that period of time, she actually moved seven times.
22 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010
There's a lot of that in this record, which explains why he's acting the way he does on the day of this aborted buy. … They drive for a period of time. Green is venting. He's profane. He's sane, as the Court talked about, the words about that could be construed as an indirect threat.
30 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.