Documents

Oral argument — Nampa Classical Academy v. William Goesling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

And in particular, in this case, where the state acting as sovereign has excluded those materials from the curriculum. … Well, it is telling, because they didn't say that the charter school is a government entity, period.

Oral argument — Kristen Barnett v. INOVA Health Care Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2024

They're just, period. They will not. This is not that case. The vaccine was not prohibited. So, because you, we know that the exemption, can you tell me why this gets even at this stage? … But it has to lead to why she can't do this act that an employer is requiring, doesn't it? Yeah.

Oral argument — Fairchild v. Coryell Cty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

And that's that 45-minute period of where she bangs six minutes continuously on the door. Lovelady stops by at 8.02.51, and then she takes eight additional minutes. … Yes, the evidence was that she threw probably some sort of quick cleaning solution out the food slot at him as he was going by.

Oral argument — Jane Roe v. Marshall University Board of Governors

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2025

The bottom line is that in each of these cases, in every case that I've looked at in the course of reviewing this, substantial control requires some official authority or act. … This student had a clean record, had never been in trouble in the past, and was simply a one-off incident that occurred in this particular instance for which they had become aware of at that particular

Oral argument — Moreno v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

Prohibited sexual act, Your Honor. All right. So the least culpable conduct is prohibited sexual act. … Judge Schwartz's comment. Let me just ask you on the comment because no court has yet, has held that possession of child pornography is not morally turpitude.

Oral argument — Jonathan Gentry v. Stephen Sinclair

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2011

Deistian was acting as a paid police informant. Nobody talked about that. The jury never knew those things. … He had been clean-shaven on June 13, 1988.

Oral argument — Keller v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2012

The games have an entire world of stadiums and coaches and audio that's created, the play-by-play commentating, all of which is created by Electronic Arts. … more expansive than the Lanham Act.

Oral argument — Allco Renewable Energy, Ltd. v. MA Electric Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2017

There was a period of time in which MDPU was acting unlawfully because it had a mistaken understanding of what the rate should be. … It solicited comments and reply comments.

Oral argument — Ding v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2025

And because a lot of the cases, it's just obvious due to the nature of the comments or the conduct. … It's usually there just by self-evidently if it's sexual nature or expressed gender comments. Here, which is actually something I think only in our favor, there weren't expressed gender comments.

Oral argument — Paula Bifelt v. State of Alaska

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2021

We think it was air. There is a distinguishing this between Billington and this case. And as Judge Kleinfeld found in the Billington, there was a tugging. … But that's why I'm trying to ask you if you can pinpoint a case that approaches that scenario where there was an extended time period of deescalation and then ultimately deadly force was used.

Oral argument — People v. Rodriguez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018

We weren't appointed until after the six months period time had expired. … It was the issue of indigency and our appointment that was the only thing that was really up in the air.

Oral argument — In Matter of Estate of P.M.T.W.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2016

Four hours within a two-month period of time, this young man saw his child. … That's just a little offhand comment here, but I don't think that's a wholly.

Oral argument — Texas Association of Mftr v. U.S. Consumer

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019

There are other parts of the Consumer Product Safety Act that use banned hazardous product. … And in this case, as in other cases with all sorts of multimember commissions, Commissioners aired their disagreement. But the majority of Commissioners disagreed with that.

Oral argument — Alberty v. Hunter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 22, 2024

I mean, this is a seven-second period, right? Yes, Your Honor, it is. … And it seems, and again, knowledge of the video, the 30-plus year clean history of Ms. Alberti. They made a decision before they did any investigation that they wanted to arrest her.

Oral argument — Pollak v. Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

The board has authority to create policy, and you have to have a majority act of the board. … The school district does not wanna turn that public comment period into a forum where- Into a public comment period.

Oral argument — United States v. City of Pittsburgh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2017

It includes television, radio, internet news publications, journalists, periodicals, scientific periodicals. … just to comments that the public put in.

Oral argument — Jamilia Jones v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2017

The comments, the texting, the touching ended in end of November, December. The staring and the – December 2011. The big one. Okay. Do we have a period of time problem? … And so that's why I say the claims, the environment period should have been counted as one for the entire period.

Oral argument — United States v. Rafael Parsadanyan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017

But then the government repeatedly introduced unnoticed prejudicial other acts, which even in the brief they don't call other acts, but which were evidence of other crimes that Mr. … Parcedanian had been sent to clean it up and to erase evidence, to destroy the evidence. But that was the one piece of evidence that remained, if we assume the jury followed the instructions.

Oral argument — United States v. Salvador Vera

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2014

Counsel, I'm a little familiar with that problem, having authored Hermann Act and been on the panel in Freeman. … But suppose we were to agree, even on plain air review, that Crawford and Daubert were violated by Lavis' testimony. What's the remedy here?

Oral argument — Sosa v. New York City Department of Ed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2020

So, even taken all together, and these were sporadic, unconnected comments over a long period of time, even all taken together, they simply don't create a pervasive atmosphere of abuse or hostility that's … On the hostile work environment, very quickly, we have a series of racial comments. We have a series of disability-related comments.