Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.35s
Oral argument — Diemert v. City of Seattle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2026
Would that count as a time barred discrete act? As a time barred discrete act, yes, Your Honor. … They're pretty bad, but it's a long period. It is a long period, Your Honor.
39 min of audioOral argument — Blayne Williams v. City of Austin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017
This is not something that is a number of discrete acts. … How can a long period of time negate causation?
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Daniel Sanchez-Martinez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018
For the majority of that time period, the Speedy Trial Clock Act was told. The defense counsel filed a discovery motion on July 21st with the express purpose of tolling the Speedy Trial Act. … And in any event, that period was told under the Speedy Trial Act. So there's no connection between this five month delay and the violation that occurred.
19 min of audioOral argument — Scola v. Publix Super Markets Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013
Hall made apparently five comments over a two-year period to her. Mr. Hall had absolutely nothing to do with any of the decisions relating to Ms. Scola's employment. … Hall made some comments to her.
26 min of audioOral argument — Kolin v. The City of Cicero
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2020
Those are the two points that set Assistant Fire Marshal Colin apart from Lieutenants Harvey, Rand, and Pijinski, who are all accused of making inappropriate comments or lewd comments but not directly … But counsel argues that their comments were not sexual. Their comments were not stupid and things like that, as opposed to be upstairs in five minutes and tuck me in.
42 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Adams
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2009
What role do those comments play in our interpretation of the statute? I'm sorry? What role do the comments play in our interpretation of the statute? … No, I think that the committee comments are relevant to the intent.
42 min of audioOral argument — Paul Moriconi v. Travis Koester
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2016
But prior, almost immediately before trial, newspaper articles were given to the plaintiff, which alleged 37 prior tasings, two lawsuits, comment by the federal, in the newspaper, comment by the federal … Well, that's not the case that we're dealing with here, period.
9 min of audioOral argument — MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v. FMC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2025
That's what the commission cleaned up 25 years ago. No, no, well, I'm sorry, I guess we're just disagreeing on this. … So I'm not aware of a clean division where you could say, oh, well, claim one was only about one-fifth of the activity in question. In fact, these are overlapping claims.
113 min of audioOral argument — Meaghin Jordan v. Maxfield & Oberton Hold
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2020
This cop, this court commented or member of this court commented on this general principle. The evidence, the post sale evidence must be relevant to the theory of the defect that comes from month. … There was no jury instruction that the court could possibly have ever given in this case to cure the air because the evidence was unrebutted. The defendants argued to the case correctly.
43 min of audioOral argument — Gamel v. Forum Energy Technol
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2022
Gamble was acting erratically. In short, that evidence is undisputed. … Bergeson, and the ten, fifteen minutes either way, the comment came up, that was actually made by Mr. Gamble.
39 min of audioOral argument — CSX Transportation Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2026
Not that you haven't done it within a specified period. … So it was for all of these reasons that the Board found that there was misuse of the Trails Act. It wasn't just because there was not use within a certain period of time.
40 min of audioOral argument — Consiglio v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014
Specifically, the Medical Practice Act provides a mandatory, this is back in 1999, a mandatory three-year limitations period and a five-year repose period related to Dr. … And this new legislation in a different act isn't doing anything but disciplining these licenses. Last comment I'll make, and I'm sure counsel will cover it.
60 min of audioOral argument — Zimmerman v. Corbett
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017
However, there was a comment as an aside that probable cause was established. The focus of the hearing was never probable cause, at least at that juncture. … Zimmerman as opposed to the cleaning person or the colleague grabbing a show off for a meeting who picked up the phone in one of the eight other offices within the office that all likely contained the
35 min of audioOral argument — Michael Kent v. Oakland County of
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2015
His hands are up in the air. His back is against the wall. And it's difficult at this point, too, to get into the facts because this is such a factually intensive case. … Briefly, to follow up on Brother Counsel's comments, he wants to point to Graham, as pointed out in our brief.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Sylvia Hollins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2016
just concluded that it's hopeless, that she'll never get her act in gear. … Well, he cursorily addressed her other argument, which was that she was basically getting her act together, and she had been sober.
19 min of audioOral argument — Lawrence Kosa v. Intl Union United Auto
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 1, 2019
And then once those applications are in the system, the people that are doing air traffic control on all of this movement of personnel determine where they fall in this very complicated regimen of placement … Myers to act with due diligence to try to figure out, you know, whether he had any claims. Because, remember, this is not a class action. These are individual claims by individuals.
37 min of audioOral argument — Harrison v. Brookhaven Sch Dist
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2022
But if we were writing on a clean slate, put aside the precedent in our circuit, why wouldn't we go to the text of the statute? … And that's my editorial comment. We don't want to slice bologna too finely here, but I don't think it's compensation.
39 min of audioOral argument — Nalini Kapur v. FCC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020
And the first thing that OTA did upon acquiring the license was throw them out of the station and take them off the air. So, you know, this the injury is not limited to the loss of that investment. … I understand the time period, Mr. Corbett, the perspective from which we evaluate your client's standing.
51 min of audioOral argument — Marty Walsh v. Adam Vinoskey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2021
could be sued under ERISA for not acting in the best interest of the plan. … Now, that may be enough under a clear air standard review.
51 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Darryl Frazer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2024
Forty-five feet from where he was standing on the second floor landing of that open-air apartment stairwell. And then on the video, you can see exactly where it hits. There's paved pathways. … And in terms of the probable… Post-search comment? You're talking about… It's not my gun.
48 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.