Documents

Oral argument — Bowman v. Monsanto Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2013

If they're going to be planted, they have to be cleaned before they are put in the ground at the right time. … First of all, because grain elevators are prohibited by state and federal law from selling seed, period. They buy grain and they sell grain. They can't sell seed.

Oral argument — San_Diego_County_Employees_Retirement_Association v. Johnson_&_Johndon_et_al

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2025

, so that is all corrective— pardon me, that is all information going into the market that is muting, all right, muting the false statements that J&J likes to say is coming out into the market and is acting … They had been aired previously. And the second one was that the tone of a pessimistic Reuters article somehow was what caused the stock, was what drove the price impact that day.

Oral argument — United States v. Basaaly Moalin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2016

as having provided for a six-month gap period to allow the continued collection of call records pending the effective date of you of the USA Freedom Act but I don't think it viewed the USA Freedom Act … alderman problem which is the government wants us all to trust the this court in Chun says the opposite and Donovan which is that if there is surveillance it has to be disclosed in a manner that can air

Oral argument — Hartz Construction Co. v. Village of Western Springs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2012

We've got period one. I've broken it down into three separate periods. Period one is after this recapture agreement had been uttered, and that was back in October of 2002. … Now, under the Platt Act, 765 ILCS 205-3, which I've set forth in the briefs, a statutory plan of dedication must conform to the requirements of the Platt Act.

Oral argument — 1-19-1390

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

There were periods, there was a period of time in it. You're right. I believe it was actually more than 10 years where he was sober. Well, yeah, I think he said it was 14 or 18 years. … As counsel mentioned, the sentencing range, and as your honors are aware, the sentencing range for a class acts of six to 30 defendants, 14 year sentence was eight years above the minimum 16 below the

Oral argument — United States v. Erik Peeters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2019

So we have plain air review here. No, no, no. I'm acting defensively to stop the enforcement of a waiver that they could have waived. They didn't waive. They've sought application of a waiver. … And the reason that is true is the government's argument and the case comes to you as by acting.

Oral argument — K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2014

of the request for a deadline extension was that the contracting officer in December 2006 to January 2007 couldn't act on it because that was actually in litigation. … Early in the contract period, when they asked for the modifications and then decided not to do it.

Oral argument — Mansfield v. Williamson Cty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2021

These air non attorney individuals acting in an administrative capacity. … There could be no liability period.

Oral argument — Richard Wershe Jr v. City of Detroit MI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2024

The district court referred to that as the 32-year inaction period that he wants to toll. The other period is 21 years. In 2003, Mr. … He lumps together all these defendants, two former FBI agents, two former assistant U.S. attorneys, and a bunch of city of Detroit officials and says, it's in the air. We all knew it.

Oral argument — John Doe v. Wallace Loh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2019

So if somebody acts in a way that the person that's acting believes is consensual, and he reasonably believes that she knows that it's him, then he's acting without intent to commit any offense. … You've commented on it. The investigation is complete. Now, there's an outcome conference.

Oral argument — Peter Cruz v. Brandon Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2022

We see these cases periodically, and I'll just speak for myself. … There is nothing in this record to indicate that the attorneys acting- that are appointed for petitioner are acting against his interest.

Oral argument — Friends of the River v. NMFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2019

I mean, what our argument is, is that the original organic acts under which these dams were constructed, the 1893 Act and the 1935 Act, gave broad congressional mandates to build... … Like when EPA, under the Clean Water Act, as the facts were in Home Builders, were directed, if the state of Arizona submits an application that has the following elements in it, you must approve it.

Oral argument — People v. Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2023

But I don't know what you call it, but it's an extended period of treatment. And if during that extended period of treatment, they become fit, then they can go to trial. … And I think it is important that we recognize that the public act that did amend all of these statutes did not intend any substantive changes.

Oral argument — Abdel Ellawendy v. Jason Takagaki

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2025

But if it found that the qualified immunity applied and didn't expressly say that Bivens' action wasn't permitted, can't we imply or assume that the court implicitly was commenting on the permissibility … Allewendy, he was a civilian employee of the FAA working on an Air Force base, and this court resolved the question of qualified immunity without weighing in on the Bivens' issue, even though it was a

Oral argument — Donald Rickard v. Swedish Match North America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014

This first comment is real brief. … as I understand the record this is one act it occurred one time with my client but he continued the other harassment and the fact that he did this to four other senior officials from one over a period

Oral argument — Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017

submitted, and the policy that we're arguing about here recognizes the distinction between that and license revocation. 3.2.1 addresses license revocation and how that's treated. 3.3 is the retention period … And they just have this mystical idea out of thin air that the railroad doesn't have to negotiate a management rights clause, which they vary.

Oral argument — Doe v. Alexian Brothers Behavioral Health Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2019

Their defense was she was completely acting outside the scope of her employment. She was, in fact, acting criminally and she went to great lengths to hide it from us. Is that what they claimed? … Let me, again, I'm looking at page 15 of your brief where you quote the committee comments on 1204. Yes. All right.

Oral argument — Diemert v. City of Seattle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2026

Would that count as a time barred discrete act? As a time barred discrete act, yes, Your Honor. … They're pretty bad, but it's a long period. It is a long period, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Blayne Williams v. City of Austin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

This is not something that is a number of discrete acts. … How can a long period of time negate causation?

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Sanchez-Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018

For the majority of that time period, the Speedy Trial Clock Act was told. The defense counsel filed a discovery motion on July 21st with the express purpose of tolling the Speedy Trial Act. … And in any event, that period was told under the Speedy Trial Act. So there's no connection between this five month delay and the violation that occurred.