Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Oral argument — Bowman v. Monsanto Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2013
If they're going to be planted, they have to be cleaned before they are put in the ground at the right time. … First of all, because grain elevators are prohibited by state and federal law from selling seed, period. They buy grain and they sell grain. They can't sell seed.
69 min of audioOral argument — San_Diego_County_Employees_Retirement_Association v. Johnson_&_Johndon_et_al
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2025
, so that is all corrective— pardon me, that is all information going into the market that is muting, all right, muting the false statements that J&J likes to say is coming out into the market and is acting … They had been aired previously. And the second one was that the tone of a pessimistic Reuters article somehow was what caused the stock, was what drove the price impact that day.
52 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Basaaly Moalin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2016
as having provided for a six-month gap period to allow the continued collection of call records pending the effective date of you of the USA Freedom Act but I don't think it viewed the USA Freedom Act … alderman problem which is the government wants us all to trust the this court in Chun says the opposite and Donovan which is that if there is surveillance it has to be disclosed in a manner that can air
51 min of audioOral argument — People v. Snow
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2015
Snow at that gas station, the gas station he was accused of committing an armed robbery and a murder at, that is that eyewitness was putting air in his tires. He saw Mr. … It's a detailed affidavit, as the court said, about what she says happened during that time period. She's laying it out there. She's telling the story.
47 min of audioOral argument — Department of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2014
Justice, the Department of Commerce, acting under authority from Congress, gave ICON the power to write standards for the Internet. … The due process question wasn't aired below at all, isn't that so? It was aired below, Justice Ginsburg. We have fully briefed due process at every stage of this case, as has the government.
51 min of audioOral argument — Hartz Construction Co. v. Village of Western Springs
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2012
We've got period one. I've broken it down into three separate periods. Period one is after this recapture agreement had been uttered, and that was back in October of 2002. … Now, under the Platt Act, 765 ILCS 205-3, which I've set forth in the briefs, a statutory plan of dedication must conform to the requirements of the Platt Act.
65 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021
There were periods, there was a period of time in it. You're right. I believe it was actually more than 10 years where he was sober. Well, yeah, I think he said it was 14 or 18 years. … As counsel mentioned, the sentencing range, and as your honors are aware, the sentencing range for a class acts of six to 30 defendants, 14 year sentence was eight years above the minimum 16 below the
43 min of audioOral argument — McCray v. Collins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2025
OK, so so help me understand your argument about how the district court you claim aired in its. … And so those are by nature acts that occurred over and over and over again. And to the extent any of those acts were investigated, those acts are part of this charge and part of this case.
33 min of audioOral argument — Feld Motor Sports, Inc. v. Traxxas, L.P.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017
So we're cleaning it up for you by showing you the models. No, Judge Prado, the court is not doing that. The New York courts that we cite explain how the process works this way. … So you can comment on it if you want to, but I know you'll follow what I said anyway, so. Understood, Your Honor.
55 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Erik Peeters
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2019
So we have plain air review here. No, no, no. I'm acting defensively to stop the enforcement of a waiver that they could have waived. They didn't waive. They've sought application of a waiver. … And the reason that is true is the government's argument and the case comes to you as by acting.
25 min of audioOral argument — K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2014
of the request for a deadline extension was that the contracting officer in December 2006 to January 2007 couldn't act on it because that was actually in litigation. … Early in the contract period, when they asked for the modifications and then decided not to do it.
44 min of audioOral argument — Mansfield v. Williamson Cty
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2021
These air non attorney individuals acting in an administrative capacity. … There could be no liability period.
47 min of audioOral argument — Richard Wershe Jr v. City of Detroit MI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2024
The district court referred to that as the 32-year inaction period that he wants to toll. The other period is 21 years. In 2003, Mr. … He lumps together all these defendants, two former FBI agents, two former assistant U.S. attorneys, and a bunch of city of Detroit officials and says, it's in the air. We all knew it.
38 min of audioOral argument — Neal v. City of Bainbridge Island
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025
The council, weren't you told that those should go to the Ethics Commission instead of being aired as part of this subcommittee? And so, continuing to bring this into that form was disruptive. … The comment that you're referring to was one of the council members, when he received the email about the conflicts, he emailed me back and said, you could submit an ethics complaint.
28 min of audioOral argument — John Doe v. Wallace Loh
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2019
So if somebody acts in a way that the person that's acting believes is consensual, and he reasonably believes that she knows that it's him, then he's acting without intent to commit any offense. … You've commented on it. The investigation is complete. Now, there's an outcome conference.
56 min of audioOral argument — Peter Cruz v. Brandon Price
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2022
We see these cases periodically, and I'll just speak for myself. … There is nothing in this record to indicate that the attorneys acting- that are appointed for petitioner are acting against his interest.
25 min of audioOral argument — People v. Martin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2023
But I don't know what you call it, but it's an extended period of treatment. And if during that extended period of treatment, they become fit, then they can go to trial. … And I think it is important that we recognize that the public act that did amend all of these statutes did not intend any substantive changes.
32 min of audioOral argument — Abdel Ellawendy v. Jason Takagaki
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2025
But if it found that the qualified immunity applied and didn't expressly say that Bivens' action wasn't permitted, can't we imply or assume that the court implicitly was commenting on the permissibility … Allewendy, he was a civilian employee of the FAA working on an Air Force base, and this court resolved the question of qualified immunity without weighing in on the Bivens' issue, even though it was a
29 min of audioOral argument — Donald Rickard v. Swedish Match North America
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014
This first comment is real brief. … as I understand the record this is one act it occurred one time with my client but he continued the other harassment and the fact that he did this to four other senior officials from one over a period
21 min of audioOral argument — Brotherhood of Locomotive Eng v. Union Pacific Railroad Compan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017
submitted, and the policy that we're arguing about here recognizes the distinction between that and license revocation. 3.2.1 addresses license revocation and how that's treated. 3.3 is the retention period … And they just have this mystical idea out of thin air that the railroad doesn't have to negotiate a management rights clause, which they vary.
32 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.