Documents

Oral argument — American Gov''t Props. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2015

Well, isn't a merger a voluntary act? … And then you have this very rhetorical comment about as two appellants are harassing the government, yada, yada, yada.

Oral argument — Anthropic PBC v. United States Department of War

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2026

As soon as that concern was raised, Anthropic worked over a period, a substantial period of time, with its national security partners in the federal government to develop Claude Gov. … I think there was an exigent need to act quickly here for several reasons.

Oral argument — United States v. Diaz-Rosado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016

Feliz, the 2015 case which is cited in the brief, which explains there are statements in this decision or comments that this court made which are very similar to some of the comments made in U.S. v. … And since he's kind of acting dopey, the police officer makes sure he takes him to the side. He's the only one who interviews him.

Oral argument — Timothy Austin v. Adrian Hoke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2014

This was the comments at the original sentencing, I think. And the court goes, but I do think you should serve some time for it. … How does that then get twisted on another motion into us acting as if the judge is vindictive?

Oral argument — Gomez-Rodriguez v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023

The issue before the court today is whether the MSPB aired when it based on two charges. … He says, if you're asking me a theoretical question, had other officers similar acts, then yes, I believe that would have required consideration under those factors of penalty of disparate treatment.

Oral argument — United States v. Ga

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

Shahini during this period of time? Mr. Shahini was — he's a resident of Kosovo and Canada. And during the relevant period, he was in either Kosovo or the Czech Republic. … This Court has — and this is not a case that we cited in our brief, but I think some of the remedy arguments really were only aired for the first time in the reply brief. But in United States v.

Oral argument — Flint v. Calandra

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2010

And counsel regarded it to be a routine motion, if you will, to clean up the pleadings to conform what was the proof at that point. … So the best answer that I can offer the court at this point is that it was regarded as being almost a ministerial act at the time.

Oral argument — United States v. Douglas Greer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

We see comments about the settlement by the court at Supplemental Appendix 336 and 37. … And so that just so happens to coincide with the period of time that's waived by the False Claims Act.

Oral argument — GE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS v. AGILIGHT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

Rainey ended, the question of an opening is not one which this Court needs to write on a clean slate. … I have no further comments. All right. Thank you, Mr. Rainey. Thank you.

Oral argument — K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2014

of the request for a deadline extension was that the contracting officer in December 2006 to January 2007 couldn't act on it because that was actually in litigation. … Early in the contract period, when they asked for the modifications and then decided not to do it.

Oral argument — Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021

And Abilie's, we think that there was insufficient national context period and that would not meet our national context test. … The appellant's papers have not explained the limitations of the Federal Rules Enabling Act or the comments to the rules.

Oral argument — Citizens for Responsibility v. FEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2017

If the district court had found that the FEC acted contrary to law in all three of its votes because it was acting on an incorrect understanding of what constitutes a political committee according to its … Whether the dismissal or the failure to act. Excuse me? I thought it was whether the dismissal or the failure to act. Yeah, that's correct. But in this case, there was a dismissal.

Oral argument — Lauren Graham v. C. Gagnon

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

Lauren Graham is standing at the door with a storm door on an air pump. She is asked to go get Colby, and she does. She lets go of the door, which closes. … Over at least a 15-minute period of time, she had an interaction with another officer at the side door. Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2011

I'm not going to leave you to clean anything up. I'm not going to leave you holding the bag kind of thing. … And can we say the counsel was ineffective or acted improperly just because the jury didn't go with the argument?

Oral argument — United States v. Crandall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2008

At that point, I think the people in each individual building would have to get together and act cooperatively. … You know, the main reason I expect courts have gone the way you suggest is that it's clean. You're through.

Oral argument — Skoric v. Commissioner of Social Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

When you say suggest in the context of a clean error analysis, which you conceded applies, that makes it even more difficult for us to identify error, it seems to me. … The Step 2 finding is also supported by the lack of evidence of psychiatric treatment or medication during the relevant period.

Oral argument — United States v. Naghani

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2003

And, you know, the belligerent drunk, unfortunately, is a common occurrence in air travel. And also the belligerent smoker is a common occurrence. … And given the defendant's conduct and words apart from the anti-American comment, it is the government's position that that did amount to threatened use of force.

Oral argument — Padres Unidos de Tulsa v. Drummond

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2026

Federal law does not criminalize mere presence in the country, period. So how is that not something different? How is that not in conflict with federal law? … I mean, don't we have to presume that the federal government's going to act in good faith? Sure, the court can presume that.

Oral argument — WildEarth Guardians v. USDA-APHIS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2015

I just wanted to see if you had any comments on that. … It says that we are going to continue to consider the comments that you've made in our future implementation actions. In ONRC action v.

Oral argument — EPIC v. US FOREST SERVICES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2006

And then, B, their position is that they addressed it in the comment period because people commenting on the EA brought up the Meteor sale or it came up during those discussions. … comment period, would we need to reach mootness?