Documents

Oral argument — American Buddha v. City of Ashland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2009

It's not the place where people have gone from the beginning of time to air their grievances. This is a courtesy. … And plaintiff's counsel has said that they at least have received periodic complaints of copyright infringement.

Oral argument — Forest Conservation Cnsl. v. USFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2006

project level, and the Forest Service's interpretation that it should do this economic balancing of all resources, how best to provide for multiple use and sustained yield, which itself means over a long period … And then they look at things like recreational fishing, keeping, you know, streams clean enough that they're stocked that fishermen would pay to come. They do different things.

Oral argument — People v. Adamson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2019

Was the comment made in the call that there are shots being fired? … In fact, the prosecutor commented, the judge, I don't think we can do that. Correct, that's 100% correct.

Oral argument — United States v. Conway

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2009

They were not simply pulled out of a hat or pulled out of thin air or the subject of some sort of deal-making negotiation process. … And I will say for the Court that I've heard the comments, and I do appreciate the Court's settlement staff. I've utilized them in other cases, and I don't think that's a bad suggestion.

Oral argument — Medponics Illinois LLC v. Illinois Department of Agriculture

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021

There are no air filtration systems to make sure that no noxious smells escape the premises. There's unbelievable security, 24-7 cameras that are required. … We did try to supplement the record with information pertaining to the public comments at those hearings because he had already reached his final judgment. Judge Goose did not allow that motion.

Oral argument — People v. Agrawal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2014

Judge, I understand your statement, and I understand the record doesn't read as clean as I would like to. It never does. … I'm supposed to take judicial notice of that comment, correct? It's just an analogy just for sake of argument here.

Oral argument — National Relig Broadcasters v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

The agency acts . . . the agency acted as a full commission in order to withdraw the order. The agency would, again, have to act as a full commission. … And so they appear in a very different context from the Communications Act provisions.

Oral argument — Allegiance Bank Texas v. M/V Lake Limo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2018

The market, as Judge Willett commented, set the price at that auction in that day. … So it would have cleaned up the issues between you all, but they may have come in with some issues against all of you. That's correct.

Oral argument — United States v. Gilbert Lundstrom

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

But as it relates to the two court sets of conduct that the government pointed to as criminal acts, he was not involved. He was not making those specific decisions. … In any event, Lundstrom aired these explanations at trial, and the jury rejected them. And, of course, your argument is that the evidence just didn't justify the jury's verdict, obviously.

Oral argument — Center for Biological Diversity

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2022

So the notice and comment period is something that EPA finds very important for the process. It realizes that it's not necessary. … EPA extends public comment period. Now, given that public comment is optional here anyhow. And given how late EPA is in complying both with the statute, getting close to a decade.

Oral argument — Andrew Berzanskis v. FCA US LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

You didn't have any ability during that six-month period to get these contracts? That's correct, Judge Griffin. Why? Because we are... … I think they knew the waiver was an issue in general, based on the case law, that they need to act on its rights immediately.

Oral argument — Jones v. Lockard

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011

You have one alleged contact within the 180-day period. Yes, Your Honour. And there's preceding alleged conducts or acts of in-conduct outside of the 180-day period? Yes, precisely, Your Honour. … And the one within the 180-day period is a backrubber. Well, there were actually two. There were two alleged. One was the speaking of my cheat comment, and the other was the backrubber.

Oral argument — Thom v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2010

Petitioners after the act was passed. … Well, if it's race due to comment, it's race due to comment as to what was decided or could have been decided.

Oral argument — Thomas v. Cook Children's Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2023

He found, no, he found most of them were not, and he found, I think, maybe four, all he could find is that two comments, Dr. Thomas admitted, yes, he said, but there were nothing comments. … Not during a two-year period. On Dr. Iglesias, he had more during a two-year period. If you look at the two-year period, they were saying we're going to look at 17 through 19 was the relevant period.

Oral argument — People v. Simmons

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2012

And the law permits a jury to infer from the defendant's behavior after a post-occurrence that he intended at the time to commit a wrongful or a criminal act, correct? … I think she said she was cleaning the bathroom. She was in the bathroom on the west side of the house. Excuse me. She heard the shots.

Oral argument — County of Santa Clar v. Astra USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2008

He just the judge had what we have, and that's the contract period and your complaint. The complaint, the contract, the inspector general's reports, Senator Grassley's letter, yes. Yes. … This particular program is not part of the Medicaid Act, but part of the Public Health Service Act. The defendants do not get any additional reimbursements for these drugs.

Oral argument — Tagliasacchi v. Wooden-Zagorski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017

One under the probate act, one under the trustee act, but superseded or supplemented by the instrument of trust. Yes. And it says within one year. Well, it says yearly, annually. Yes, it does. … Within the time period set up by the trust? I don't think so. So, but again, I thank you very much. That's the court's. Thank you. Thank you for your time.

Oral argument — Cleeton v. SIU Healthcare, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2023

Because plaintiff's attorneys will hearken the ruling and will, at this point in time, go back to the old Wild West when everybody was named as a defendant, and let's clean it up later. … In that interim period, Dr. Bakir objected, and Dr. Bakir said, here's my deposition, Your Honor, here's the medical records, here's the deposition of Dr. Al Sawaf, the neurologist.

Oral argument — First Financial Insurance Comp v. Tonya Brumbaugh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2013

Doesn't that put some obligation on you to act? No, sir, it doesn't under South Carolina law. … And the 30 days notice would have covered the period in question. If Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Alan Barnett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2016

Barnett was identifying and associating, and the whole purpose of the conversation was to provide support for these non-UBN set members in terms of the activities that were taking place on the air. … There were text messages to Kimmy Cook, who was Gangsta Woo in Virginia, 142 within a five-month period of time. In other words, she is deeply enmeshed in the details.