Documents

Oral argument — Jones v. Lockard

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011

You have one alleged contact within the 180-day period. Yes, Your Honour. And there's preceding alleged conducts or acts of in-conduct outside of the 180-day period? Yes, precisely, Your Honour. … And the one within the 180-day period is a backrubber. Well, there were actually two. There were two alleged. One was the speaking of my cheat comment, and the other was the backrubber.

Oral argument — People v. Simmons

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2012

And the law permits a jury to infer from the defendant's behavior after a post-occurrence that he intended at the time to commit a wrongful or a criminal act, correct? … I think she said she was cleaning the bathroom. She was in the bathroom on the west side of the house. Excuse me. She heard the shots.

Oral argument — People v. Yang

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2013

Period. … They're mine from defense counsel's comments or trial counsel's comments to the court.

Oral argument — Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. Hamer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2013

As Your Honors knows, there are three sets of regulations relating to the three enabling statutes involving the Counties Act, the Municipal Code, and the Regional Transportation Authority Act. … They can open a notice and comment proceeding. And we can have a proper airing of the concerns and the balances that you're raising, Justice Thomas.

Oral argument — Joseph Robertson v. Chevron USA, Incorporat

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015

That's the ridiculous setup of the Class Action Fairness Act. … The only requirement, the only jurisdictional amount requirement for jurisdiction over a mass action is $5 million, period, end of story.

Oral argument — Jonathan Starbuck v. Williamsburg James City County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2022

Correct and the court essentially said that because that they did not act no final policy making authority acted in that case the the plaintiff lost but had they chosen to intervene at that point they … i do not believe any way in the world this would have happened there's something about this student while this was taken to this level and maybe the record doesn't doesn't bring it out but it has an air

Oral argument — United States v. David Copeland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025

And to go to the evidence supporting those substantive counts here, again, we're here not only on a Rule 29 posture but on a plain air Rule 29 posture. And so Mr. Copeland's burden is very high. … I think the court's comments at sentencing could be read as indicating that the otherwise extensive prong was met.

Oral argument — Kelly Matherne v. Ruba Management

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2015

Matherne got beaten up and bruised There had been innumerable prior complaints that had just been blown off and not acted on But let me address the last complaint Because what the evidence shows was that … Hyatt Says, what in the world are you ladies doing That's causing the men to act like this That's no investigation That's blaming the victim And Ms.

Oral argument — Center for Food Safety v. Andrew Wheeler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2022

So turning first to this issue of notice and comment. … the typical comment period is about 30 days so if this court asked the agency under C4 to put the studies up for public comment you know that is also probably we're looking at a handful of months I would

Oral argument — United States v. Guldi (Davidson)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2026

Davidson to serve a period of supervised release on home confinement. … Turning first to mootness, obviously, the Court is aware this defendant has already served her period of incarceration and the period of home confinement.

Oral argument — Edgar Leal v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

Well, this takes it away from somebody drunk doing their, you know, cleaning their car on the driveway or sitting around with a bunch of friends and having a beer. We're not talking about that. … That's what I was getting at when I made my comment earlier about the definition of recklessness. The water balloon thing simply doesn't fit. It does not.

Oral argument — Bramlett v. Vandersand

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2019

That he had muddy boots at the time, and he could not own his Edwards house because she kept a clean house. … If there are no questions, I'll just take a comment from earlier argument. No questions. Okay. Thank you for your arguments.

Oral argument — Jordan v. Macedo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2025

And if it exceeded, then you're entitled to the prejudgment interest from the period when the filing took place until the judgment is entered. … It's $2,000 worth of costs that were submitted, and it's just up in the air. There's no way to go behind that to find out what the arbitrator meant.

Oral argument — Carla Echeverry v. Phillip Padgett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2020

And in this situation, they showed up, gave them a certificate of insurance from the policy period, from the prior policy period that had been on file with the state of Alabama for their licensure. … So, insofar as Louisiana law is concerned, what's the time period we're looking at? To the extent Ms.

Oral argument — Shilling v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2025

Oh, that was up in the air. What about the organizational plaintiff? I'm a little bit troubled by that. For standing purposes, we look at who on the day of the complaint was filed. … So they couldn't have acted in reliance on it.

Oral argument — Henderson v. Shinseki

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2010

The doctor said he was he's paranoid schizophrenic, so he's having periods. … What we had is a period where veterans were not given judicial review.

Oral argument — Tate Road Solar 1, LLC v. County of Winnebago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2026

In 2021, Illinois announced a statewide policy of transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2050. That was a controversial policy and not everyone agreed with it. … Counsel, if we can follow up with Justice DeArmond's comment. Subsection B has the language that we've discussed frequently, notwithstanding any other provision of the law.

Oral argument — Sosa v. New York City Department of Ed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2020

So, even taken all together, and these were sporadic, unconnected comments over a long period of time, even all taken together, they simply don't create a pervasive atmosphere of abuse or hostility that's … On the hostile work environment, very quickly, we have a series of racial comments. We have a series of disability-related comments.

Oral argument — United States v. McPartland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2022

Period. … And we didn't make any argument to be different at trial if we said, oh, that was just an idle comment. You know, didn't really mean it. Wasn't meant as a threat.

Oral argument — Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice Brewer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2013

And that was air. One of the problems I have here is that, to some degree, your argument seems like a verbal one. … But in terms of whether they're authorized, whether you're required to do it is not true, but whether they are authorized to be here, the REAL ID Act says, for example, that it is valid during the period