Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Oral argument — People v. Breault
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2026
got anything to do with the 911 call the argument the state did mention in part the specifics from cross-examination of what my client had and had to police so yes the prosecutor also included uh some comments … about you know he didn't tell police specifically he admitted that he didn't say he was gasping for air was choking well is there anything wrong with that not if it was limited but here the state went
39 min of audioOral argument — Isaiah Wilkins v. Pete Hegseth
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025
We're saying people living with HIV, if you act rationally, meet all of those criteria. … And, and that the Declaratory Judgment Act, I take her argument to be the Declaratory Judgment Act has a similar basis. And so maybe it's the same thing as 706. I'm not sure.
50 min of audioOral argument — Gomez-Rodriguez v. Army
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023
The issue before the court today is whether the MSPB aired when it based on two charges. … He says, if you're asking me a theoretical question, had other officers similar acts, then yes, I believe that would have required consideration under those factors of penalty of disparate treatment.
73 min of audioOral argument — Patrick Maloney v. T3Media, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2017
I believe they're either $15 or $20, Your Honor, depending on the time period. … Zucchini, for example, today had himself shot out of a cannon and was videotaped, and a news station stole that videotape and put it on air, then Mr. Zucchini would have a copyright claim.
31 min of audioOral argument — Local 17 Iron Workers Pension v. Harris Davis Rebar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2015
That test that your honor is, and we'll talk about, didn't just drop out of thin air. It arose in a factional context. It arose in the context of no accident. … I actually was going to skip that one, but I will tell you that the Pension Protection Act does not, the Pension Protection Act creates lots of obligations for employees who are already obligated to contribute
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Watts
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2004
Watts acted unlawfully within the allegations of the petition. And I want to draw the Court's attention to the very last alleged incident here, the June 21, 2000 phone conversation in which Mr. … I hope the Court recognizes that not only did this comment come at the end of a contentious 10-year relationship between Mr.
22 min of audioOral argument — Kerbes v. Raceway Associates
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2011
, a 40-day period, and have a life outside work. … And I think, you know, those comments by the court, there were similar comments echoed by the Adams Court and there were even similar comments echoed in the City of Rome Firefighters Court by that court
34 min of audioOral argument — Meaghin Jordan v. Maxfield & Oberton Hold
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2020
This cop, this court commented or member of this court commented on this general principle. The evidence, the post sale evidence must be relevant to the theory of the defect that comes from month. … There was no jury instruction that the court could possibly have ever given in this case to cure the air because the evidence was unrebutted. The defendants argued to the case correctly.
43 min of audioOral argument — Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States, ex rel. Hunt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2019
Your friend relied on the, if I'm remembering right, the United Air Regulatory case. Yes, Your Honor. How do you distinguish that? … Now, the relator in that sense would also have more of the six-year period to bring the suit.
55 min of audioOral argument — GE LIGHTING SOLUTIONS v. AGILIGHT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013
Rainey ended, the question of an opening is not one which this Court needs to write on a clean slate. … I have no further comments. All right. Thank you, Mr. Rainey. Thank you.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rosie Diggles
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2019
There's also the concern of just fairness to the district court, and that goes to the air preservation issue. … Counsel, I'm sorry, did you have an answer or comment to Judge Higginbotham?
68 min of audioOral argument — Clinton McGraw v. United Tugs, Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018
We believe it's plain air to have not awarded him anything for past lost wages. So now we get to going forward, and we feel that the award for future wages is also clearly erroneous. … whatever period of time we're talking about at the time of the injury.
42 min of audioOral argument — Toledo Mck v. Mack Trucks
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Isn't the rule that if they establish a conspiracy was in existence before the limitations period, if there are overt acts that continue within the limitations period, they're good? No. Okay. … Mather's point, if you would, she says that all the stuff that goes on in that period, Mr. Byer, has to do with Mac comments, and that's independent action, and it doesn't reflect concern.
32 min of audioOral argument — Cynthia Yelling v. St. Vincent's Health System
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2023
Aside from Will Hite's comment that occurred in March of that year, what other specific comments were made outside of the 180-day period? … That includes acts. And you have to do so from a reasonable person's perspective.
36 min of audioOral argument — Baxalta Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2020
Isn't it true that the really confusing comment occurred early in the Markman hearing before Genentech's oral argument? … Just again, just to make sure I'm airing everything out.
49 min of audioOral argument — Stephen Redd v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2022
So do you just want a bright line, we pick a number out of the air, 25 years, and declare that if it's 25 years or longer, that violates due process? … Oh, absolutely, but this highlights one of the vexing nature of this problem, and Judge Tallman made a comment about this.
49 min of audioOral argument — Issiakavs Atty Gen Usa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
If I could try to answer your comments, beginning with the translation. … And lo and behold, the affidavit of the lady from Philadelphia who met him in that time period, December of 2003, describes this horrible skin condition.
45 min of audioOral argument — People v. Duffin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2017
So he turned and held up papers in the air to block the view, and it was the officer's assumption that why would you hold up papers in the air unless you were looking to block the view. … At the times that the law enforcement lengthens the stop in order to accomplish whatever purpose they're choosing to accomplish at that time, they can't now say that it was – the lengthening of that period
67 min of audioOral argument — Francisco v. Abengoa, S.A
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2024
Well, there could be, and I think if you were noticed cleaning land, maybe it would be different also, right? … The exchange act.
65 min of audioOral argument — Beltran v. Lockheed Martin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026
Beltran in his deposition He didn't say it was because he had these two elements of discipline within the same period of time or whether one was warranted or not What he said was, I thought this was insubordination … decision-making because of the protected activity as opposed to the second discipline Or these other people in those situations they hadn't engaged in protected activity So I just I don't think it's as clean
42 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.