Documents

Oral argument — Tagliasacchi v. Wooden-Zagorski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017

One under the probate act, one under the trustee act, but superseded or supplemented by the instrument of trust. Yes. And it says within one year. Well, it says yearly, annually. Yes, it does. … Within the time period set up by the trust? I don't think so. So, but again, I thank you very much. That's the court's. Thank you. Thank you for your time.

Oral argument — County of Santa Clar v. Astra USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2008

He just the judge had what we have, and that's the contract period and your complaint. The complaint, the contract, the inspector general's reports, Senator Grassley's letter, yes. Yes. … This particular program is not part of the Medicaid Act, but part of the Public Health Service Act. The defendants do not get any additional reimbursements for these drugs.

Oral argument — Tate Road Solar 1, LLC v. County of Winnebago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2026

In 2021, Illinois announced a statewide policy of transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2050. That was a controversial policy and not everyone agreed with it. … Counsel, if we can follow up with Justice DeArmond's comment. Subsection B has the language that we've discussed frequently, notwithstanding any other provision of the law.

Oral argument — Steve Robert v. City of Boca Raton, Florida

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2024

But what you, so you're relying on Coddling making racist comments to other officers, but what do those comments have to do with Robert? … There's the tile of Officer Codling's behavior directed at the SWAT team and those comments.

Oral argument — Robert Martin v. City of Boise

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2017

And the cause of action under the Declaratory Judgment Act is still 1983, as far as I'm concerned. … So, we have not had, I guess, a full factual airing of all of these numbers, correct? Well, we did, Your Honor, up until the point that the judge ruled on the record before.

Oral argument — Diaz del Castillo v. DSHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2008

And so, for example, with regard to the royalty comment, again, going back to Ms. … I believe the royalty comment made it introductions. If you go back and look at Ms.

Oral argument — In re Edmonds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014

I don't think her Vitas this court's opinion provides for that I think what the court has done is very carefully limit what cases we might take from outside the practice setting and did so by saying air … McGarry's comment one was that there was no evidence that August 2005 report was false I would direct your attention to the tax return that responded filed at the year end just before at the end of four

Oral argument — Garcia-Cortez v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2004

Garcia Cortez's testimony about giving addresses that he didn't live at until much later in the application, not within the 10 year period. … I mean, it's just throwing a dart up in the air and it doesn't even come close to hitting the target. Right. That's what she's contending in our position is absolutely not.

Oral argument — Starr Indemnity and Liability Company v. Signature Flight Support Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2025

So during that interim time period, a friend of a friend started trying to find pilots to fly this airplane. So the owner of the airplane had nothing to do with selection of the pilot. … So he was acting as an agent for Mr. Marino. There's no evidence of that. And he indicated I was just helping a friend. I was not the entity's manager. So no. Okay.

Oral argument — Narouz v. Charter Comm, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2008

Well, I think it wasn't acted on because on the docket... Because it had been JS 6 for some inexplicable reason, but anyway, it was. … So, in fact, if the case goes back on that basis, then 2B is still up in the air, isn't it? In the sense that you don't know one way or another whether the class is going to be certified.

Oral argument — People v. Trujillo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2023

language was kept in custody isolated in a high-risk cell away from others and deprived of any access to a telephone or any access to the courtroom in violation of his statutory rights now during this period … and finding otherwise the circuit court erred and this court should find that his statements the police were not voluntary and this improper denial mattered in this case specifically and no harmless air

Oral argument — City & County of San Francisco v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

We're on that topic, and you might add your comments now. Otherwise, I'm happy for you to go on to whatever else. We're in agreement with the City of San Francisco. … It's a question of whether they're acting arbitrarily and capriciously.

Oral argument — Mount v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

Mott stated he wished to clear the air and went on to state how the email was given to him. Mott asked if he should speak to the special agent in charge to give him his version of events. … Period. Isn't that enough if you go to OSC? I mean, you're talking about employees who are not lawyers.

Oral argument — Estate of James Franklin Perry v. Cheryl Wenzel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2017

With this particular manner, the officers— The crudeness of their comments. That comment was made by one lieutenant, and he testified that he made that comment as a shocking device to make Mr. … He appeared to be acting consistently with how he acted when he came into the jail facility. Which was what?

Oral argument — Thomas v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

Haven't we been holding it and then vacating it and then we seem to be somewhat up in the air about the question? What do you say? … That's why these acts happen, and as unfortunate as they are.

Oral argument — United States v. Garcia-Aguilar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2007

It is a ministerial act. It is a formality. Only if Rule 11 has been complied with. I have to win the Rule 11 argument. I got that part. But I still have not. . . … And if you read their various comments, they certainly, all of them, agreed that the plea was no good because of the Rule 11 violations. Not very persuasive comments, I must say.

Oral argument — Doty v. Tappan Zee Constructors LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2020

And I just want to, if I may comment, the totality completely points to him being a seaman. And it's not just an opinion. It's the fact that he did 90 percent of his work doing that work. … Doty, changing air filters, putting oil into the machinery while that construction project for the Staten Island Naval Yard was going on.

Oral argument — Hulsh v. Hulsh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

But if they say there's no cause of action, period, then you're not going to take piecemeal damages and say, well, you know, for expenses, we'll allow it, even though there's no cause of action. … The comment was that the area, this area that we're in your honors of custodial interference. Imposes a large possibility of a multiplication of lawsuits.

Oral argument — BIG 5 CORPORATION v. GULF UNDERWRITERS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2005

Purillator Air, cited at page 31 of the answering brief, the California Supreme Court said with respect to damages, claimed damages, for unpaid wages as follows, quote, the amount of unpaid wages was simply … That means any claim that's made during the period, is it not?

Oral argument — 21_3093_USA v. Lynell Guyton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2025

He he did not contest in his closing any counts of the firearm counts, which should be a reason why these arguments on plain air shouldn't be upheld. … And then in the second conviction, the qualifying offense that we're talking about where he's sentenced in 11, he's also given credit for that same period of time.