Documents

Oral argument — United States v. John Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2015

So he went to trial knowing that he would not see the light of day and breathe free air again once he was convicted on this case. … Have a shorter period of supervised release. And when he comes out, if he's 100 years old, impose the conditions then. Yeah.

Oral argument — United States v. David Hopkins

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

we're talking about preservation of air, doesn't and shouldn't have to be all that significant. … That one strikes me as such an obvious and clean error that it ought to be structural. It's not our case. This one here is presented in a much more subtle way.

Oral argument — Center for Biological Diversity v. Lee Zeldin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2025

Well, the Clean Water Act does require that EPA solicit and review comments from the Fish and Wildlife Service. And it does require that EPA ensure that any state... … Fish and Wildlife Service can comment at that time. Fish and Wildlife Service can also comment during the public notice period. And Fish and Wildlife Service can comment through EPA.

Oral argument — Exendine v. Sammamish City of

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008

And also in Penman, I believe there was a question of fact as to whether or not the building authorities were acting under pretext, merely because they're trying to clean up this area. … These folks were aware that the city was trying to get these codes cleaned up – code violations cleaned up, rather. They gave them lots of notice.

Oral argument — United States v. W. Hllywd Cmnty Rdvlpmnt C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2006

Let's say once the Supreme Court came down with its – let's put behind us the period up until the Supreme Court acted and say, well, that wasn't – everybody was in confusion, and maybe we'll agree that … So did the city as a matter of law act reasonably in waiting during the four or five months time period, a city, a governmental entity, waiting several months, waiting a four-phone call, maybe, or waiting

Oral argument — United States v. Clements

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2003

First of all, it's inapplicable because it was a Youth Corrections Act case. It was a juvenile case. … So perhaps you could comment on what the prejudice is. Certainly, Your Honor. I'll skip down to that. That was my final point.

Oral argument — Ryan Widmer v. Jossette Okereke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

Air Force. But he didn't know, the chief didn't know that the man allegedly had not been in that position. … But at some point in that period of time, he did obtain an OPADA certification. He obtained the education necessary to become a police officer.

Oral argument — Heartland Polymers Realty, Inc. v. Polychem Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2020

What Judge Hughes actually did, I think, is kind of threw her hands in the air and said, it's just a wash. I don't think she was giving you a pass on the promissory note. … The EPA said Heartland had to clean it up.

Oral argument — Jocelyn Allen v. Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2016

We know that there's a 10-year investigation and remediation period alleged. Why can't that just be enough here at this particular stage? … They knew that the pollutants would contaminate the groundwater and the soil without further remediation and potentially, as we've alleged, escape into the air and into the homes.

Oral argument — United States v. Theodore Norris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2009

Well, because I don't think it was cleaned up for the jury. I don't think the jury understood there was no limit. Well, cleaned up, you know. Provided that. … Anderson that he had acted in self-defense was two weeks. In this Court's case in Opplinger, the pre-arrest silence that is commented upon is silence when Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Gary Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2025

And can I add one more comment? … The last thing I would say is look to the verbiage of the statute, and that's how the air becomes as clear here as any other plain air case where people have gotten relief.

Oral argument — People of the State of Calif. v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

Kinder Morgan has been cleaning up the site since then. In 2010, Your Honor, all of the soil was cleaned up. And a no further action letter was received from the water board. … crossed in the statutory period or crossed before?

Oral argument — Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. Sec PA Dept of Environmental Prot

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

It is a right protected by the Clean Water Act. The dissent, though, right? … federal requirements of the Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — Allegiant Air, LLC v. Intl. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

They have even imported and agreed to the NMB, which is the additional step under Railway Labor Act. … of what would be a normal grievance filing period.

Oral argument — Alaska Community Action on Tox v. Aurora Energy Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2014

There is coal, but coal is a defined pollutant under the Clean Water Act, and it's falling into waters of the U.S. … Importantly, the Clean Water Act prohibits discharges of pollutants, and I don't think that's at issue here.

Oral argument — United States v. Michaelis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2018

If he took that care here, he would have determined that while the defendant's criminal history was significant, it was condensed to a particular period of time. He'd been clean for two years. … And that's where the plein air is. But I've got a real problem on the third problem. Right.

Oral argument — Power Fuels, LLC v. Federal Mine Safety & Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

the statutory purpose, which is to protect individuals who are engaged in the work of preparing the coal and may be exposed to such hazards as Your Honors have cited to before, such as coal dust in the air … They clean coal. They prepare coal to some general set of specifications.

Oral argument — County of Will v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017

Again, that's assuming that there will be mistakes or that the fill that comes in is not clean. As that term is defined by the Act and board regulations. … So the board strengthened front end requirements to ensure that the materials that came to the fill would be clean, as that is defined by the Act and Board regulations.

Oral argument — UC Regents v. USDHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

for two-year periods. … And I think that's where we would get to Montana AIR.

Oral argument — Jose Zumel v. Loretta E. Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2015

It was granted amnesty for acts constituting rebellion, coup d'etat committed during the period of 1986 to 1994. So that's the whole 6-year period. That's correct, Your Honor. … We're dealing with a Philippine Air Force general who participated, obviously, in a coup attempt with others over 20 years ago, for which acts he has now been given total amnesty by the Philippine government