Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

1.01s

  • Oral argument — Banks v. General Motors, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

    outside and acts inside the period, that deal with degradation, the environment that continues the whole time, you know, that's out for everyone to see. … Like in the Razmi case, there were continuous comments about Mr. Razmi's religion and other people's religion over a three-year period every day.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Mark Landersman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

    So even if the – How many of the overt acts did the judge find were proven? She made no finding with respect to each and every overt act. … The inference that was drawn, as she went on the record specifically, she had withdrawn as to one particular comment, which is that he had this meeting with Martinage and he aired what he wanted to do

    68 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brown v. Cirque Du Soleil

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2007

    Bollinger had made comments to her periodically, referencing the two of them as being experienced in the business or being veterans, that they had survived a long time. Ms. … It diminishes her claim because it's less likely that someone the same age as the affected individual would act against that individual for some reason.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Luther McKiver v. Secretary, Florida Department

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020

    And it is our position that the district court aired and denying both of those claims because the state court's application of Strickland was unreasonable in light of the facts that were present to the … So I guess I go back to from my perspective, the question that Judge Bratcher act, which is my question, which is, as I understand it, we look at could have the state court where it didn't give us reasons

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mario Ramos-Navas v. Merrick Garland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2021

    It's also notable that the BIA didn't address the argument that the IJ aired by concluding that public officials won't acquiesce when gang members mistreat Mr. Ramos in prison. … Ramos, if moved to El Salvador, is more likely than not to be tortured, period. And counsel for Mr.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ronald Peterson v. Simon Lesser

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2015

    There was no lockbox as originally represented and continuously represented during the course of the relevant time period. … And when you describe the doctrine that way it sounds like a species of clean hands.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kinsale Insurance Company v. Advanced Services, In

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

    So what we brought in our summary judgment motion was the clean argument, insured versus insured. So that way you didn't have to get into that, that analysis. … Does the fact that Georgia Pacific and Advanced could be separately liable for separate acts of negligence alter that at all?

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Wisner

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2025

    And in order to find her guilty, you have to find that she shot a gun into the air or she slammed a door on someone's hand because she wasn't paying attention, that type of thing. … Now, as to the conscious disregard, pardon me, that was related to the January 7, 2020, comment.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Legacy Health System v. Patrick Allen

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

    I mean, we can't manufacture a bed out of thin air. So where would you be? I'm trying to understand the practical implication. Sure. The day afterward, we'd be in the same position we're in now. … you can see the reasons given by Disability Rights Oregon why it's concerned about the potential for a divergence and incentives here and and while I greatly appreciate the spirit of opposing counsel's comments

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Marcel King

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2012

    So the fundamental difference is that the probation requires an act of discretion by the district court judge. … I take it from your initial comment that you, at least implicitly, and now I will ask you explicitly, agree that the Davis question is waived.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Trinity Marine Products, Inc. v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015

    He fall squarely into the Harrison dynamic in which he's acting upon intuition, suspicion, impulse. … I mean, given the government's lack of clean hands throughout this matter, I mean, why isn't that one more pebble on the scale of equitable stop?

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joseph Robertson v. Chevron USA, Incorporat

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015

    That's the ridiculous setup of the Class Action Fairness Act. … The only requirement, the only jurisdictional amount requirement for jurisdiction over a mass action is $5 million, period, end of story.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Joseph Raoul, III

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2025

    His health was not the same at the two time periods. The district court's comments were clear in the statement of reasons and at sentencing. … And in doing that, she was acting well within her discretion.

    18 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State of Mississippi v. DOE

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025

    So this 110-day comment period in your review is really kind of two separate comment periods. … The Act requires DOE to periodically revisit these standards every six years, and DOE couldn't do that. So Congress's purpose was to speed along these rules.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Isaiah Wilkins v. Pete Hegseth

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025

    We're saying people living with HIV, if you act rationally, meet all of those criteria. … And, and that the Declaratory Judgment Act, I take her argument to be the Declaratory Judgment Act has a similar basis. And so maybe it's the same thing as 706. I'm not sure.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Oestreicher v. Alienware Corp

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2009

    Okay, so let's just keep them clean. So first we're doing 10 and 10 with respect to the arbitration question. Okay. Good morning, Your Honor. Paul Schloud for Alienware. … So there's no question that a company can say, here's our warranty, and if it fails within that time period, we're responsible. And if it fails after that time period, you're responsible.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Madison Cawthorn v. Barbara Lynn Amalfi

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2022

    Summers commenting on notice-and-comment rulemaking, right? That's a procedural right, a procedural right to raise a challenge. It's not a substantive right. … So that whole question there is still up in the air. Now, we can make it so that anybody can come in with any kind of problem, and a state can't do it.

    78 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brown v. Cirque De Soleil

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2007

    Gasparelli, whatever his comments may have been way back in time, he was not given the opportunity to share those comments or any comments, for that matter, in the decision maker's ultimate determination … Bollinger had made comments to her periodically, referencing the two of them as being experienced in the business, or being veterans, that they were. They had survived a long time. Ms.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Muchinski v. Wilson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2012

    So we don't have simply a clean or discrete state procedural law or state procedural question. That has been ruled upon by Superior Court, do we? … Back then, it was the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, so I'm dating myself. And I'm an old Common Pleas Court judge, so I used to do this stuff a lot.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Mosaic Health, Inc. v. Sanofi−Aventis U.S., LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2025

    It was Air 340B, the drug lobby's 340B industry-wide association that said, what a terrible executive order. That's 129. … See Johnson & Johnson in our 20HA letter, which is what happened to Johnson & Johnson when they acted alone. The third plus factor, a motive to conspire, absolutely- I asked for the strongest.

    33 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.