Documents

Oral argument — GLH Communications, Inc. v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2019

And what the commission found in 1996 was the conflicting federal interest was the obligation that's set forth in the Communications Act that auction proceeds have to go into the federal treasury. … The commission's view is, you know, I default on my mortgage, I lose my house, period.

Oral argument — Powersv.Lycoming Engines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It was only controlled for a two-year period. … Then the other issue is that there was a change in the heat specification, but it wasn't for the entire time period. So that's also not capable of class-wide proof.

Oral argument — United States v. Tyrone Mitchell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2019

Before your time runs out, could you comment on Judge McKee's reference to the judge's reference to Mitchell's arrest record? … The court did not make the comment that Your Honor repeated to the government's attorney. Which commented sentencing. Yes. And let me explain. You're quoting something from my brief.

Oral argument — Yukos Capital Limited v. Russian Federation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2026

And we know that this court, in reviewing what the district court did in terms of the adequacy of a foreign system in the air crash over South India case, recognized that that review is subject to an abuse … Why is that the time period for these purposes when the arbitration took place? It's the time period both under international law and under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.

Oral argument — Garten Trucking LC v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025

And if that's the case, then aren't my colleague's comments, Judge Qualabong's comments, don't they become especially pertinent in terms of the standard of review that we owe to the agency in the NLRB … The timing of the union's comments and the response, the coerciveness inquiry wouldn't necessarily be altered because this was an individual that was a part and he had authority to comment on past wages

Oral argument — Osama Abdelfattah v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014

United States Air Force, this court has said that it's sort of a balancing of interests. … that he was unable to work for much of that period.

Oral argument — Aviles Martinez v. Blanche

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2026

May it please the court, Alana Young for the acting attorney general. … She filed, she filed a motion that said, I filed this late, which you think that just occurred to her out of the, out of, out of thin air?

Oral argument — United States v. Momoud Abaji

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 24, 2023

Abaji accountable for substantive acts that were reasonably foreseeable as part of the conspiracy. And then it still acquitted him on one of the loans. … Your comment? Well, I haven't read that opinion, but I obviously am familiar with that case. It's a very high profile case.

Oral argument — Alfred Villaneda v. James Tilton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2011

I think Congress has foreclosed that by an act in 2253C. I believe that's contrary to the Supreme Court's decision. … This is kind of up in the air as to how to proceed.

Oral argument — United States v. Shane Vandergroen

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2020

Your Honor, I don't know if during the time period when he was being had been handcuffed and being walked to the patrol car. If at that point, the officers lowered their guns. … We believe that the repeat air both for structural as well as sufficient the evidence grounds warrants reversal in this case. Thank you both sides for the very helpful arguments.

Oral argument — Shafer v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2011

I guess the last comment I would make is the EGS case or ESG case. It is an administrative review case under the Administrative Review Act. It is failure to include an indispensable party. … It was the commission that changed the TTD issue, finding that the period of November 17, 2007 through December 10, 2008, she was not entitled to TD for that period.

Oral argument — United States v. Herman Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2017

Faria had acted with him. The second issue I want to address is that there's no direct evidence anywhere in the trial that shows an intent to defraud on behalf of Ms. Faria. … It occurred over a period of eight years.

Oral argument — Emmanuel Houston v. Shawn Phillips

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022

to make it to the World Series But when it comes to the case When it comes to the legal advice On which my client will base his decision Whether he's going to jail for a decade or 23 years There's no airing … Kalir I know you've taken this case Under the criminal justice act That's real service to your client And to our system at large And we very much appreciate that Thank you your honor Thank you both The

Oral argument — Woodley v. Gulfport Energy Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2022

district court, misconstrued and misapplied both the Supreme Court's and this court's legal framework for assessing Sanner allegations and claims brought under Section 10b of the Securities Exchange Act … That allegation is pulled completely out of thin air. Gulfport's disclosures not only don't support it, they contradict it.

Oral argument — United States v. Betsy Duranty-Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015

control over the defendant and by limiting her to not collect money on someone else's behalf to provide complete disclosure of her financial situation on the in the other conditions does not rise to plain air … the court didn't really address how closely these conditions were related to the crime of conviction as opposed to kind of a global assessment of how unbelievable and unreliable and fraudulent she had acted

Oral argument — Schrum v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2008

Shrum's statement that there was coal dust on the ground and that there was some dust that would come into the air. … There was obviously something that he was in contact with during that period of time that aggravated his asthmatic bronchitis condition.

Oral argument — Hulsh v. Hulsh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

But if they say there's no cause of action, period, then you're not going to take piecemeal damages and say, well, you know, for expenses, we'll allow it, even though there's no cause of action. … The comment was that the area, this area that we're in your honors of custodial interference. Imposes a large possibility of a multiplication of lawsuits.

Oral argument — Carter Page v. James Comey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2024

They knew from the outset that there was never a basis to surveil Carter Page, and everything they did from then on until they finally came clean, you know, years later, everything they did from then on … It's a two-year period to submit that administrative claim from when the claim accrues.

Oral argument — Mosaic Health, Inc. v. Sanofi−Aventis U.S., LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2025

It was Air 340B, the drug lobby's 340B industry-wide association that said, what a terrible executive order. That's 129. … See Johnson & Johnson in our 20HA letter, which is what happened to Johnson & Johnson when they acted alone. The third plus factor, a motive to conspire, absolutely- I asked for the strongest.

Oral argument — USDept.of Transpv.CMCEng

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009

Act. … However, there is significant intervening case law, and, you know, to some extent it seems justified to send it back and sort of have a clean slate.