Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.82s
Oral argument — United States v. Yagman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2009
Do you have the act outside bankruptcy to get you where you want to go, and if so, what is it? Yes. … The time period for the income tax evasion was a longer time period than the time period for the bankruptcy fraud. And counsel characterized count one as being limited to not paying taxes.
48 min of audioOral argument — Patterson v. Wells Fargo & Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2026
And so under Pintos, if an application comes in clean and the bank has done its due diligence and still isn't on notice that this is not its bona fide customer, I don't think the law in the Ninth Circuit … Hence my comment about marketing services.
31 min of audioOral argument — Blue Rider Finance, Inc. v. CityScope Productions, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2013
The settlement agreement itself says plaintiff can take no action for a period of 30 days while Mr. Odom and his companies try to obtain financing for this bogus movie. … That allegation is pulled from thin air, from whole cloth, and it's inconsistent with what they plead.
52 min of audioOral argument — Arista Networks, Inc. v. ITC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017
Once the commission finds that an unfair trade act has occurred, it may issue an exclusion order under subsection D. … And under Hyundai, VSCOFAN, and sealed air, the commission has broad discretion to do this.
56 min of audioOral argument — Erin Osmon v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023
Well, to stop for the Tort Claims Act doesn't have to be within the scope of employment. … So what is happening during the 15 minute period when they will not give me my thing back and they're calling for the person who with the gun, that's not a seizure.
37 min of audioOral argument — McGee v. City of Chicago
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2012
And so when you get 111 confessions in this period of three years, when you're supposed to be non-confrontational, then our expert, who is the president of the American Polygraph Association, who was hired … She kept the place sparkling clean. She would not have left blood on her telephone. Was it conclusive to be blood? It was a reddish-brown stain, Your Honor. Right.
44 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2020
You have your spot of time and we'd ask you to respond during that period of time and not interrupt each other. All right. Thank you. I have another question. … Well, if that was the case, then all of our licenses would be up in the air every time we write a brief. Mr. Rittenberg, I have a question for you.
57 min of audioOral argument — Nathan Smith v. Donald J. Trump
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2017
They were Air Force officers in addition to Elizabeth Holtzman, who were the plaintiffs in that case. … Period.
67 min of audioOral argument — Brown v. Cirque De Soleil
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2007
Gasparelli, whatever his comments may have been way back in time, he was not given the opportunity to share those comments or any comments, for that matter, in the decision maker's ultimate determination … Bollinger had made comments to her periodically, referencing the two of them as being experienced in the business, or being veterans, that they were. They had survived a long time. Ms.
44 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2011
Can I comment, Your Honor, in an indirect way? I want to start with this express requirement. … of sentencing and the Fair Sentencing Act is the Act that will apply.
38 min of audioOral argument — 03-16830 Camarena v. SAMP/USA Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2005
He was not acting. Well, that may be. But you're saying there was no evidence of any contract. … And what's unclear from Your Honor's question is whether the $250,000 figure, if that's pulled out of the air and it's just kind of what I feel like asking for today, then it's not liquidated.
31 min of audioOral argument — GLH Communications, Inc. v. FCC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2019
And what the commission found in 1996 was the conflicting federal interest was the obligation that's set forth in the Communications Act that auction proceeds have to go into the federal treasury. … The commission's view is, you know, I default on my mortgage, I lose my house, period.
31 min of audioOral argument — Powersv.Lycoming Engines
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
It was only controlled for a two-year period. … Then the other issue is that there was a change in the heat specification, but it wasn't for the entire time period. So that's also not capable of class-wide proof.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Tyrone Mitchell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2019
Before your time runs out, could you comment on Judge McKee's reference to the judge's reference to Mitchell's arrest record? … The court did not make the comment that Your Honor repeated to the government's attorney. Which commented sentencing. Yes. And let me explain. You're quoting something from my brief.
33 min of audioOral argument — Garten Trucking LC v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025
And if that's the case, then aren't my colleague's comments, Judge Qualabong's comments, don't they become especially pertinent in terms of the standard of review that we owe to the agency in the NLRB … The timing of the union's comments and the response, the coerciveness inquiry wouldn't necessarily be altered because this was an individual that was a part and he had authority to comment on past wages
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Shane Vandergroen
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2020
Your Honor, I don't know if during the time period when he was being had been handcuffed and being walked to the patrol car. If at that point, the officers lowered their guns. … We believe that the repeat air both for structural as well as sufficient the evidence grounds warrants reversal in this case. Thank you both sides for the very helpful arguments.
36 min of audioOral argument — Chase Bank USA, N. A. v. McCoy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010
So, you know, Justice Scalia sort of snidely, but I think accurately, described Mead as saying only when agencies act through adjudication, notice and comment rulemaking, or some other procedure indicating … comments.
58 min of audioOral argument — People v. Winkler
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2016
Your Honor, I would ask that it be reviewed under a plein air doctrine, number one, in light of the defense counsel's awareness of the double enhancement principle. … What was charged in the Bill of Information was, on the predatory count, was that an act of sexual penetration occurred.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Herman Jackson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2017
Faria had acted with him. The second issue I want to address is that there's no direct evidence anywhere in the trial that shows an intent to defraud on behalf of Ms. Faria. … It occurred over a period of eight years.
23 min of audioOral argument — Emmanuel Houston v. Shawn Phillips
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022
to make it to the World Series But when it comes to the case When it comes to the legal advice On which my client will base his decision Whether he's going to jail for a decade or 23 years There's no airing … Kalir I know you've taken this case Under the criminal justice act That's real service to your client And to our system at large And we very much appreciate that Thank you your honor Thank you both The
22 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.