Documents

Oral argument — 05-10508 USA v. Ghilarducci

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

And the reason why the stolen property wasn't dwelled on is because it's basically the stolen property would have come from the mail fraud, the act of mail fraud. … And in the language in the agreements about good, clean, cleared funds of non-criminal origin, I mean, that is ridiculous.

Oral argument — United States v. Re

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2019

The instructions offer that the government must establish that the defendant acted with the knowledge that a crime was being committed. … The applicability of Rosemont outside the 924C context in the Second Circuit is maybe a question that's up in the air, but it doesn't need to be decided in order to decide this case for the reasons that

Oral argument — Changsheng Du v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

But I think a starting point, and I mentioned it on page 18 of my colleague in the Justice Department's brief, is the comment that this involved a single incident. It did not. … Maz motive, which is a factual finding reviewed for clear air.

Oral argument — Nieblas v. Rimmer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2005

Counsel, you know, the way this argument comes across to me is that every trial judge or every judge in your State violates his oath of office to act impartially towards a witness, that he's ignoring lies … And I submit ---- And defense counsel was not prevented from commenting on these explanations that were offered by the prosecutor. That's true. That's true.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael J. Madigan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

There's lots of evidence throughout this record of Speaker Madigan taking actions contrary to comments interest during this period. … With regard to ComEd, the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the government, proved a continuing scheme that involved specific legislative acts over a period of years.

Oral argument — AD HOC SHRIMP v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2011

For TIEMEI, as Commerce explained, the additional CEP sales reported by TIEMEI were sales that had shipment dates prior to the period of review, but invoice dates within the period of review. … The Department of Commerce and the Court of International Trade both acted well within their discretion here.

Oral argument — United States v. Nguyen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2008

misbranding I think that's right your honor so let's focus on the misbranding for a moment for my benefit all right as I understand it materiality is an element correct but what's the putting you under a plane air … In both the Stein case and in this case the that instruction started off by saying an act is done knowingly if the defendant is aware of the act and does not act through ignorance mistake or accident.

Oral argument — United States v. Reza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

activity as they understood it, if it was not illegal for them to act, then you don't win, right? … He passed areas he could have passed, and it is correct, Judge Holmes, that he had to use the rumbler air horn, that ground-shaking device, twice.

Oral argument — United States v. Major

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

And it is just a litany of prior bad acts. Now, even that wouldn't be dispositive. … In this particular case, I did try a trial to keep it confined to that set period, and I was mindful of the case law.

Oral argument — In re: Westhuizen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2023

Yeah it's interesting though to look at those voluminous paragraphs and The citation that the judge used for most of those was the complaint I didn't see in it in the air where the judge says I've I've … counsel about this Do you want to comment on the portion of the record that came in in the reply brief?

Oral argument — People v. Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2024

I lost contact there for a period of time so I apologize and I can listen to the earlier comments. I do have a question. … They acted lawfully at the time. Okay.

Oral argument — Bohaboy v. Baxter International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2024

So the focus is on that period between when they started their investigation and they terminated him, what they did to him during that period. That's right. … It's what was the Cardozo phrase, negligence in the air. I mean, you have to have an injury related to a violation of a duty.

Oral argument — Murphy v. US Department of Education

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

That needs to be reviewed for clear air, if anything, just as it was in Nash, and we submit that that factual finding is supported by the testimony and all the other factual findings made by the bankruptcy … Tramp's response to that question, Your Honor, which is the law does not require an act of futility.

Oral argument — United States v. Calvin Reid

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2014

The number is pulled out of thin air and the states have different numbers. The number 10 is not a constitutional number, right? That's correct. … I see you were appointed under the Criminal Justice Act. We appreciate your advocacy. Thank you. You may adjourn the court. This honorable court is now adjourned.

Oral argument — Hif Bio v. Yung Shin Pharma

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2007

That is the act that they complain of. … On the one hand, you're saying that your entire invention for your complaint is the abstract idea that this substance might have anti-cancer therapeutic properties, period.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Corwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2013

They were married for a long period of time. … He's never going to be responsible for paying this money, period.

Oral argument — Terrance Varner v. Dave Davey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2018

First, I want to make some comments on the standard of review because I think that's important on the harmless error issue. … Entirely commenting on Bland here and the questions you had.

Oral argument — United States v. Douglas Moss

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2021

Was there some evidence that reimbursement rates increase periodically, sometimes more than annually? Yes, that's correct, Your Honor. … Um, turning to the court's discount of 10% that 10% was based on the testimony of Sean Taiwan's one comment from Sean Taiwan.

Oral argument — Mario Ramos-Navas v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2021

It's also notable that the BIA didn't address the argument that the IJ aired by concluding that public officials won't acquiesce when gang members mistreat Mr. Ramos in prison. … Ramos, if moved to El Salvador, is more likely than not to be tortured, period. And counsel for Mr.

Oral argument — Randi Bruce v. Adams and Reese LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

Those are the only specific comments or instances of conduct that Bruce alleged within— The desk comment. And the comment—and it's not clear from the complaint if that comment was made to Ms. … Even if he's not there, he's still making comments like, oh, no, on an almost weekly basis in these online teams meetings during that six-month period or whatever, once he started working from home more