Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Oral argument — Thomas Nagel v. City of Jamestown
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2019
Nagle was not in any way as unlike the Morgan case acting with it as a spokesperson for the Police Department or carrying out job duties or in any way relating this to his job at all. … No because the sheriff was upset no question about it in fact within moments after that television program was aired at the six o'clock news the sheriff was on the line talking to people about so the sheriff
29 min of audioOral argument — Silvernail v. Armstrong
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2003
And I wonder if you can comment on this. … Hawley, we'll give you a couple of minutes for rebuttal since we took up a lot of your air time. Thank you, Your Honor. I'll try to be brief.
28 min of audioOral argument — Nua Gjokaj v. United States Steel Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2017
Did he identify these supervisors who made these comments? He could not. But this is a large plant where supervisors rotate constantly. … Well, the Act makes very clear that an employee does not have the right under the Act to do so for the first 28 days after the injury.
35 min of audioOral argument — Berlant v. Goldstein, Faith & Matthew
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 29, 2016
And in that case, the attorney, in that case, in that case, there was a defense attorney who was bringing a defamation act. … Because if the principal directly tells the employee, don't do this specific act, and the employee specifically does do that act, that suggests you can't follow directions, that she's insubordinate.
53 min of audioOral argument — American Hospital Association v. Thomas Price
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2017
Medicare fraud is a real phenomenon, and there are claimants out there where there are potential false claims act liability. … One of the comments that he makes. Tell me the JA cite that well. JA 165. I'm sorry. So the third to last page.
53 min of audioOral argument — Palmyra Pacific Seafoods v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2009
So it's possible that they could use a plane or a helicopter to get from their air vessel, which is outside of the zone, to the island. … And if the government acts in such a way that limits that, you have certain rights under the contract.
50 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Sepetu
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2026
So we have one email over a period of years, and we have a personal relationship? With the scammer, yes. … And so if somebody did a really good job and kept their papers clean, that can't be enough.
42 min of audioOral argument — Riley's American Heritage Farms v. James Elsasser
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024
There has to be a legislative act, something that has... But what can they do? The school board, the school board adopts... Didn't they sort of already do that? I'm sorry? … I think your, I thought your argument was, yeah, but that's all been, that's all been cleaned up by these subsequent actions. Not exactly. Dr.
44 min of audioOral argument — Stonemor INC v. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters,Local469
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024
I mean, it was like, you guys might have been doing some cleaning up stuff in terms of, you know, how you wanted it to look on a page, but the grievance procedure, it didn't change, did it? … And so I'm going to still count 10 days, but I'm going to toll the period in between when you kind of notice that you got a problem until you finalize that.
37 min of audioOral argument — People v. Morse
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015
This defendant, again, could have gone to bench trial in front of this judge with a clean slate and, sure, you know. … Period. That happened. Okay, well, where's the unfairness then? Instead of prejudice, we'll talk about what was unfair about the ultimate conclusion.
38 min of audioOral argument — Carter Page v. James Comey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2024
They knew from the outset that there was never a basis to surveil Carter Page, and everything they did from then on until they finally came clean, you know, years later, everything they did from then on … It's a two-year period to submit that administrative claim from when the claim accrues.
82 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Clemente Hernandez-Garcia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022
language linking 1326 and the Posse Comitatus Act. … We would ask that the court apply clear air standard to the district court's findings in this case.
30 min of audioOral argument — Veasey v. Abbott
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021
plaintiffs raised here as can be seen in justice ginsburg's dissent instead they followed the plain language of the phrase prevailing party as it had been used in dozens of fee shifting statutes over a period … does that final judgment is it in favor of the plaintiffs or the defendants here that final judgment is in favor of the defendants and so the plaintiffs are not prevailing parties in the district court aired
28 min of audioOral argument — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2013
Well, at 405 Illinois Act III, 395-96. … Your Honor, I think the counsel for comment has pointed out that he's relying on the Hartigan decision, the 148.1.2, Act 405, which the first sentence from the Supreme Court said, turning to the terms
48 min of audioOral argument — United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufact v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2025
You can always start notice and comment. Agencies always do that. … to say we want to have a new notice and comment rulemaking.
131 min of audioOral argument — Shell Oil Company v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2014
So some of the governmental apparatus that led to these contracts was coming into place during the period before Pearl Harbor. … A party can clean up their own mess. So in that case, there is no liability imposed by the government. Even if that was a fair distinction, that's not what we have here.
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Soren Korzybski
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012
Again, if the condition in the judgment said that he must enter and successfully complete a mental health treatment program during the period of his supervision, then he was still during the period of … What the record reflects is that the notice was given that there was going to be a release hearing more than likely under the Crime Victims Act. Was she called by the prosecutor?
45 min of audioOral argument — Eriberto Errera v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2012
And the immigration judge made a comment in his decision about how it wasn't clear to him. … It had to do with the Federal First Offender Act, and it had to do with something entirely separate. But what it had to do with was a reliance interest.
32 min of audioOral argument — Archer Western Contractors v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins Co. of PA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017
We should act on the basis of a denial of cert? Well, I would say the court didn't think it was necessary to hear it. … I think we have about 30 years of established law on the topic, and while the various commentators may have a lively debate amongst themselves as to whether they think California's rule of law on this
29 min of audioOral argument — Tomaselli v. Beaulieu
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2014
How do we know that this particular town's rules allow or don't allow public comment at select meetings? … And one possibility is there's no way you could know it unless the government came clean. And that supposedly happened when they testified, you say, in 2006 or something like that. 2006. 2006.
34 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.