Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.42s

  • Oral argument — Thomas Nagel v. City of Jamestown

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2019

    Nagle was not in any way as unlike the Morgan case acting with it as a spokesperson for the Police Department or carrying out job duties or in any way relating this to his job at all. … No because the sheriff was upset no question about it in fact within moments after that television program was aired at the six o'clock news the sheriff was on the line talking to people about so the sheriff

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Silvernail v. Armstrong

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2003

    And I wonder if you can comment on this. … Hawley, we'll give you a couple of minutes for rebuttal since we took up a lot of your air time. Thank you, Your Honor. I'll try to be brief.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nua Gjokaj v. United States Steel Corp

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2017

    Did he identify these supervisors who made these comments? He could not. But this is a large plant where supervisors rotate constantly. … Well, the Act makes very clear that an employee does not have the right under the Act to do so for the first 28 days after the injury.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Berlant v. Goldstein, Faith & Matthew

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 29, 2016

    And in that case, the attorney, in that case, in that case, there was a defense attorney who was bringing a defamation act. … Because if the principal directly tells the employee, don't do this specific act, and the employee specifically does do that act, that suggests you can't follow directions, that she's insubordinate.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — American Hospital Association v. Thomas Price

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2017

    Medicare fraud is a real phenomenon, and there are claimants out there where there are potential false claims act liability. … One of the comments that he makes. Tell me the JA cite that well. JA 165. I'm sorry. So the third to last page.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Palmyra Pacific Seafoods v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2009

    So it's possible that they could use a plane or a helicopter to get from their air vessel, which is outside of the zone, to the island. … And if the government acts in such a way that limits that, you have certain rights under the contract.

    50 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Sepetu

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2026

    So we have one email over a period of years, and we have a personal relationship? With the scammer, yes. … And so if somebody did a really good job and kept their papers clean, that can't be enough.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Riley's American Heritage Farms v. James Elsasser

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

    There has to be a legislative act, something that has... But what can they do? The school board, the school board adopts... Didn't they sort of already do that? I'm sorry? … I think your, I thought your argument was, yeah, but that's all been, that's all been cleaned up by these subsequent actions. Not exactly. Dr.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stonemor INC v. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters,Local469

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

    I mean, it was like, you guys might have been doing some cleaning up stuff in terms of, you know, how you wanted it to look on a page, but the grievance procedure, it didn't change, did it? … And so I'm going to still count 10 days, but I'm going to toll the period in between when you kind of notice that you got a problem until you finalize that.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Morse

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015

    This defendant, again, could have gone to bench trial in front of this judge with a clean slate and, sure, you know. … Period. That happened. Okay, well, where's the unfairness then? Instead of prejudice, we'll talk about what was unfair about the ultimate conclusion.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carter Page v. James Comey

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2024

    They knew from the outset that there was never a basis to surveil Carter Page, and everything they did from then on until they finally came clean, you know, years later, everything they did from then on … It's a two-year period to submit that administrative claim from when the claim accrues.

    82 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Clemente Hernandez-Garcia

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2022

    language linking 1326 and the Posse Comitatus Act. … We would ask that the court apply clear air standard to the district court's findings in this case.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Veasey v. Abbott

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021

    plaintiffs raised here as can be seen in justice ginsburg's dissent instead they followed the plain language of the phrase prevailing party as it had been used in dozens of fee shifting statutes over a period … does that final judgment is it in favor of the plaintiffs or the defendants here that final judgment is in favor of the defendants and so the plaintiffs are not prevailing parties in the district court aired

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2013

    Well, at 405 Illinois Act III, 395-96. … Your Honor, I think the counsel for comment has pointed out that he's relying on the Hartigan decision, the 148.1.2, Act 405, which the first sentence from the Supreme Court said, turning to the terms

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufact v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2025

    You can always start notice and comment. Agencies always do that. … to say we want to have a new notice and comment rulemaking.

    131 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shell Oil Company v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2014

    So some of the governmental apparatus that led to these contracts was coming into place during the period before Pearl Harbor. … A party can clean up their own mess. So in that case, there is no liability imposed by the government. Even if that was a fair distinction, that's not what we have here.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Soren Korzybski

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

    Again, if the condition in the judgment said that he must enter and successfully complete a mental health treatment program during the period of his supervision, then he was still during the period of … What the record reflects is that the notice was given that there was going to be a release hearing more than likely under the Crime Victims Act. Was she called by the prosecutor?

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Eriberto Errera v. Eric Holder, Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2012

    And the immigration judge made a comment in his decision about how it wasn't clear to him. … It had to do with the Federal First Offender Act, and it had to do with something entirely separate. But what it had to do with was a reliance interest.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Archer Western Contractors v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins Co. of PA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017

    We should act on the basis of a denial of cert? Well, I would say the court didn't think it was necessary to hear it. … I think we have about 30 years of established law on the topic, and while the various commentators may have a lively debate amongst themselves as to whether they think California's rule of law on this

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tomaselli v. Beaulieu

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2014

    How do we know that this particular town's rules allow or don't allow public comment at select meetings? … And one possibility is there's no way you could know it unless the government came clean. And that supposedly happened when they testified, you say, in 2006 or something like that. 2006. 2006.

    34 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.