Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.39s
Oral argument — McGee v. City of Chicago
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2012
And so when you get 111 confessions in this period of three years, when you're supposed to be non-confrontational, then our expert, who is the president of the American Polygraph Association, who was hired … She kept the place sparkling clean. She would not have left blood on her telephone. Was it conclusive to be blood? It was a reddish-brown stain, Your Honor. Right.
44 min of audioOral argument — Original Sixteen v. Fed. Mine
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2006
It worked for the mine for a longer period of time. That's true, Your Honor. And the fact that he was who? … He cleaned debris. He set up the slusher. This is all things that any other miner would do. There was nothing exceptional there.
45 min of audioOral argument — Thomas Nagel v. City of Jamestown
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2019
Nagle was not in any way as unlike the Morgan case acting with it as a spokesperson for the Police Department or carrying out job duties or in any way relating this to his job at all. … No because the sheriff was upset no question about it in fact within moments after that television program was aired at the six o'clock news the sheriff was on the line talking to people about so the sheriff
29 min of audioOral argument — Dzumsud Sadychov v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2014
Or was there air by the board? I mean, what's the argument for fear of future persecution? Well, we believe the board erred because there was past persecution. … He was never – in fact, he testified to having business concerns, and that was the reason why he would travel back and forth from Lithuania to Azerbaijan during that time period as well.
29 min of audioOral argument — Nua Gjokaj v. United States Steel Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2017
Did he identify these supervisors who made these comments? He could not. But this is a large plant where supervisors rotate constantly. … Well, the Act makes very clear that an employee does not have the right under the Act to do so for the first 28 days after the injury.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Turner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2024
And Maldonado, I mentioned and blout I mentioned in part because those air cases where officers actually saw people come out and those people said nobody's there. … And the magistrate judge here had an opportunity to see Detective Soto testify and be examined and found that he did not act with reckless disregard. He acted carefully and preparing the warrants.
40 min of audioOral argument — Patterson v. Wells Fargo & Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2026
And so under Pintos, if an application comes in clean and the bank has done its due diligence and still isn't on notice that this is not its bona fide customer, I don't think the law in the Ninth Circuit … Hence my comment about marketing services.
31 min of audioOral argument — Suellen Klossner v. IADU Table Mound MHP, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2022
When you're talking about the run of cases and whether something is reasonable, maybe some underlying findings based on the record would make a difference and maybe that's clear air. … So under the Fair Housing Act, you can have a qualifying disability if the disability prevents you from working.
44 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Turk
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2014
Turk had maintenance for three and a half years, and at the end of the three and a half year period, her maintenance terminated. … But I don't think the number is necessarily pulled out of thin air. But, no, it's not maintenance because it is substantially less than what she needs to support herself.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Daniel Ernst
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2015
I need some air. Oh, okay. I can't get any closer to this thing. That's just the problem. … All the evidence floating around in the air, or you look at the.
36 min of audioOral argument — Friends of the Earth U.S. v. Export-Import Bank of the United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2026
Does that ever open up your comment period again? That's what we're getting at. … I mean, in PETA, it was the agency is not acting at all, period. It was in an action plan. In this case, the agency has been acting. It obviously had notice and comment process.
77 min of audioOral argument — Israel Discount Bank v. Schnapp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006
as acting properly. … And — okay, so there was a period of about a week or so? Yes. Well, he might not even have seen it, for all we know.
32 min of audioOral argument — Jacobs v. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2016
So the comments are important. The comments, I thought, are what direct you to the instructions that the Childhood used in this case. … We've already commented on that. The problem here is this is a distinction with no meaning under the law.
99 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Dion
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2017
We are charged with doing all of that during the quiet period. … We're in Title IV in the quiet period, and it is very important.
76 min of audioOral argument — Shavonda Bailey v. City of San Antonio, Tex
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017
And they would argue every act they did was simply to try to cuff his other hand and subdue him. … How can these officers be acting like that when there's this genuine situation going on?
42 min of audioOral argument — Angela Craig v. Steve Simon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2020
period period i could give you many examples trust me article one of the constitution does the opposite it subordinates state law to the federal law on vacancies why doesn't the actual case you're starting … of congress an act of congress in in the 1870s an act of congress in the 1960s the later act of congress has to be harmonized and that was the narrowest grounds upon which the supreme court could have
43 min of audioOral argument — Alberto Patino v. City of Pasadena
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2017
That is a claim of legal error by the city that the district court aired, and there is not a single case to support the contention that one election in a minority Latino district where all of the candidates … The filing period is underway. Yes, the campaigning is underway.
49 min of audioOral argument — Construction and General Labor v. Town of Grand Chute
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018
Well, the ordinance defines inflatable sign to be any sign constructed of fabric or other flexible material that takes on a three-dimensional shape when filled with air. … It says, I suppose speaking of the ones in the community center sign district, inflatable signs require a permit, period. I don't see any criteria for the permit other than five days.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Christopher Bendann
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2026
And by the way, I'm reading from the District Court's factual findings here, which are entitled to deference on clear-air review. Mr. … So there was no improper act in holding the phone up to his face.
40 min of audioOral argument — USDept.of Transpv.CMCEng
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009
Act. … However, there is significant intervening case law, and, you know, to some extent it seems justified to send it back and sort of have a clean slate.
44 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.