Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Reggie Pettus

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2023

So I think that the court certainly couldn't have clearly aired. And I would say the same thing, Judge Boardman. … Pettis acted in self-defense.

Oral argument — United States v. Nazareno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2007

But even, that's not going to be enough on a clear air standard. No, and I, right. … At the evidentiary hearing, Judge Garcia carefully considered the demeanor as well as the testimony of each of the witnesses, and that is borne out by his comments in his ruling.

Oral argument — United States v. Joseph Raoul, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2025

His health was not the same at the two time periods. The district court's comments were clear in the statement of reasons and at sentencing. … And in doing that, she was acting well within her discretion.

Oral argument — Veasey v. Abbott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021

plaintiffs raised here as can be seen in justice ginsburg's dissent instead they followed the plain language of the phrase prevailing party as it had been used in dozens of fee shifting statutes over a period … does that final judgment is it in favor of the plaintiffs or the defendants here that final judgment is in favor of the defendants and so the plaintiffs are not prevailing parties in the district court aired

Oral argument — Stollman v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025

But there was a period of time when there was an investigation going on. You're not claiming that they investigated in bad faith or that they acted in bad faith. That the ACS. … And she's in a state of disarray, frequently, as reported by teachers, as to not being properly cleaned or neglected, right? No. No, the teachers had not reported that.

Oral argument — Farrell v. Tri-County Metro

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2008

Counsel, maybe you'll get to this, but was the jury specifically asked to find that one of the acts was the last act that caused him to lose the time for which he seeks compensation, or do we know? … And I commend the parties for presenting what seems to be a pretty clean issue. I guess it's your client because it elected not to contest some things.

Oral argument — Amando Clavano v. P. D. Brazelton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2014

And they sense the judge's displeasure that they haven't cleaned this thing up one way or another. And two of them sound a little equivocal. And they go back. … Armando Clevano is entitled to have an attorney who is acting on his behalf.

Oral argument — United States v. Cannon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

And so we followed the, we followed Crozier, we followed Roth, and we did everything that we could to get the defendant, I mean, to, you know, to keep the record clean that we were giving him the right … In any event, I agree with the Court's comment as far as traceability of assets, though.

Oral argument — United States v. Tanganica Corbett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

It does seem to me that this is an issue where you have to establish plain air, but it appears to me that you have. I'm having more trouble, though, at least for me. … I think the court's use of Bailey is instructive here, because it's that act of employment or the conversion of the thing.

Oral argument — United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufact v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2025

You can always start notice and comment. Agencies always do that. … to say we want to have a new notice and comment rulemaking.

Oral argument — United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2013

Your Honor, the District Court aired when it held that Mr. … And then the Arizona courts commented upon the commentary to the statute. So it did not actually decide – it did not apply the use of force definition. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Luke Brugnara

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2017

Brugnara's mental illness did not comment on sentencing. Mr. Brugnara was not evaluated with proper testing by an expert until after he was convicted and trialed. … You're saying that because he was acting as his own counsel or just because as a defendant, he wasn't capable of being tried because he was insane? Is that what your point is?

Oral argument — United States v. Werdene

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2017

Luckily, we're not writing on a clean slate here. And it says when, this is a new, admittedly, this is a new frontier with the technology. … Let's see what we get over this two-week period as it didn't play then, and we'll go from there. Is that okay? Is that still a good faith exception?

Oral argument — Joshua Atchley v. AstraZeneca UK Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2024

or the person committing the act. … But as I read the Supreme Court's opinion, they're saying this is a tort law concept, and in torts you have to aid individual acts. And here the individual act is the act of international terrorism.

Oral argument — Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2017

You know, the Clean Water Act, you know, you can only proceed if the company is discharging water into navigable water. But the system always works by the fact it has to start with an allegation. … Now, that would be a nice, clean rule, right? Individuals would know that their civil service disputes go to the Federal Circuit. And discrimination claims go to district court.

Oral argument — In the Matter of Rita P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2013

Because what happened in the Madison H case, it was a dependency proceeding under the Juvenile Court Act. … So in Madison H, it was a dependency proceeding under the Juvenile Court Act.

Oral argument — Consumers Research v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2023

And did you file a comment in that 14-day period? We did, Your Honor. It is a 14-day period. It's short. Yeah, and what did the comment do? … So your opponent mentioned the 14-day period for people such as themselves to make comments. How long does the FCC have to evaluate what USAC has done?

Oral argument — Bettys Foundation v. Trinity Christian Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2022

Just a quick comment, Your Honor. Contrary to what counsel suggested, I am not arguing that Rogers should not apply in this case. … So it's a clean slate, Your Honors.

Oral argument — BLOCK v. VA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2011

At the time, this court did not exist, and the Veterans Judicial Review Act had not been passed. … It was the liberalizing laws that allowed it to be showed just based upon statistical studies and associations in the Dioxin Act, in the Agent Orange Act of 91, that have allowed almost all of these conditions

Oral argument — People v. Swatelle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 18, 2016

And then right after that, he goes into his comments. The defendant's record is replete with weapons offenses. … I shot an arrow into the air, it fell to the ground, I know not where. Well, if I don't know where it fell, how am I supposed to be guilty of quote unquote having intent to harm someone?