Documents

Oral argument — Biggs v. Wyatt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

Wendler said, they're all ADA cases, Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act cases. And none of those cases deal with disputes over causation of the disability. … The plaintiff has argued that the Verdict Form D, it was air for that to go to the jury.

Oral argument — United States v. Milliron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2025

And whether her comment that she could not know could be deemed material when within moments she gave the prosecution exactly the information it was after. … Because that is the lead-up to the question, is going through the bank records and the numerous deposits over a three-year period, and my client says, I don't know why.

Oral argument — Alejandro Ordonez v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2012

And then I look at the Federal Tort Claims Act, which looks pretty good. … Davis, and look at the situation in the Second Circuit and the Adeliki case, and comment on that and how that was resolved subsequent to a case not unlike Martinson.

Oral argument — United States v. Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2024

Greenwood pled guilty to the charged crime, because for about a three-month period of time in 2015, one coin made a brief foray into the U.S. market, which it quickly abandoned. That foray, Mr. … Some of the comments that he made in email said that he was, quote, sidestepping due diligence regarding the source of funds.

Oral argument — People v. McKinney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2010

My client, I got to understand, denied committing these acts. … If you have a couple of brief closing comments, go ahead. No, Judge, I believe I covered it. All right, well, thank you.

Oral argument — Stephen Shea v. Cellco Partnership

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2016

That, in fact, is the synonym that Congress uses in the False Claims Act. And an action is not brought when an existing complaint is amended. … What is the problem with their position if we just have a clean rule that says once that other case is dismissed, then instead of doing an amended complaint, just do a new complaint?

Oral argument — Ducey v. Myers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2005

I should clean up and get at them. Which one? There were two cases, Your Honor. One was Martinez v. City of Federal Way. … He allowed until, I believe, August 29th for discovery, so there was a discovery period of a full almost nine months.

Oral argument — Wolford v. Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2026

The overall package of laws passed by Act 52 bans, presumptively bans, carry on 96.4 percent. … The Act of June 22, 1868 admitted Louisiana as a state. That was the Radical Reconstruction Congress.

Oral argument — United States v. Christopher Bell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2013

They consented after a period of time. It was not an immediate consent. There were briefs filed. … This record is clean.

Oral argument — Weichsel v. JP Morgan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

That's all in Comment 9E2. In addition, it can be provided on and combined with a periodic statement. That's both the regulation, 1026.9E2, and Comment 9 – this gets really confusing here. … There is a Comment 9E with numbers after it. There is also a Comment 9E in parentheses, 2 in parentheses, and then numbers after it. So I'm referring to Comment 9E2-1 and 2.

Oral argument — Dixon v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2023

When the lower court discussed the informal claim doctrine, the lower court first aired in its analysis of the Supreme Court decision in Kales. … How can the agency act on it if it no longer has authority under the statute of limitations to act?

Oral argument — Frederick Schiff v. The City and County of San Fra

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2013

Conduct – I mean, acts or omissions. Is conduct in the release? No, but the words acts or omissions are, which are analogous to conduct. All right. Well, what did the release release, then? … The plaintiff had been an acting lieutenant, and the other fellow, Ali, had never been an acting lieutenant.

Oral argument — United States v. Ramirez-Martinez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2009

error because it is a single comment, a single isolated comment. … by basically requiring a futile act to go back and do it over again?

Oral argument — People v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 30, 2020

Do any of these cases make comments on the severity of the crack? They do not. Not a single case describes what the crack was, only that the crack existed. … The state attempts to distinguish it on the basis of that air freshener, but it really makes no difference. The inquiry is the same.

Oral argument — Shell Oil Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2014

So some of the governmental apparatus that led to these contracts was coming into place during the period before Pearl Harbor. … A party can clean up their own mess. So in that case, there is no liability imposed by the government. Even if that was a fair distinction, that's not what we have here.

Oral argument — DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. v. Veterinary Orthopedic Implant

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2021

The standard is clear air. It's quite clear that my brother has a different interpretation of Appendix 2138 than Judge Flesinger did. … And I'm going to try to very quickly just comment on some of the stuff that my colleague has mentioned from back to front. He just commented about the standard being known or not known.

Oral argument — Leoncio Garcia v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2018

It was not actually being operated for the purpose of cleaning the surface? The record does not show that either way, Your Honor. … It opened the whole 24-hour period. Right. Okay. So, the videotape starts, I think, an hour, an hour and a half before the scrubber comes through. Half an hour after the scrubber comes through, Mr.

Oral argument — Howard Welgus v. Trinet Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2019

We're here on a dismissal of a securities class action that was brought under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. … All they're able to point to is that at the end of the period, with respect to the internal controls for financial reporting, there were weaknesses.

Oral argument — Lay v. Mazer-Hart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2005

So the inference is, in reference to your question, this long-acting, psychoactive drug cocktail, when he was taking those medications, he was rational and functional. … It would have been, I believe, a replay of what happened in November, which is that he would have been sent back to the hospital and held until he was given a clean bill of health to be able to aid and

Oral argument — Lovering-Johnson v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2007

I thought that they said that there were a number of instances in which there was delay during this time period that was chargeable to your client. No, you're correct. … But, yes, that would, you know, perhaps cause them to act quickly. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Thompson? Let me cover two points.