Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Ademola Adebayo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2021

Um, what about I understood that the government introduced some evidence that this activity was taking place in sort of open air, open site in the pharmacy in the back. … Adebayo was identified as a pharmacist that was acting in the front of this pharmacy, and the pharmacist that was acting in the back was actually Mr. Young, and that was testified to by Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Tanganica Corbett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

It does seem to me that this is an issue where you have to establish plain air, but it appears to me that you have. I'm having more trouble, though, at least for me. … I think the court's use of Bailey is instructive here, because it's that act of employment or the conversion of the thing.

Oral argument — Gilberto DeJesus v. Sergeant Willie J. Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2021

And so, I think we just need to clean that up going forward, don't you? … That's an Eighth Amendment violation, period, right? The second the legitimate purpose ends, so I guess that would be my answer.

Oral argument — Samuel Ballengee v. CBS Broadcasting, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020

And the third was that Ballengee intentionally acted illegally, acted immorally, and or contributed to this opioid crisis for profit. … But, you know, I cleaned up my act and in 2015, in 2016, I was running things differently. The fact is that that is not supported by the record either. As recently as November of 2015, Mr.

Oral argument — Jon Sanchez v. Robert Elizondo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

So he was not just willy-nilly pulling something out of thin air. He was interpreting the rules and what the rules allowed him to do. … rules and asked for comments, and then he construed the rules and his ability to proceed with just one arbitrator.

Oral argument — Friends of the Earth U.S. v. Export-Import Bank of the United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2026

Does that ever open up your comment period again? That's what we're getting at. … I mean, in PETA, it was the agency is not acting at all, period. It was in an action plan. In this case, the agency has been acting. It obviously had notice and comment process.

Oral argument — Doris Lapham v. Walgreen Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2022

Third, I will address how the lower court aired. And fourth, the interference in Florida Whistleblower Act claims. First, beginning with Griffin v. … And then the other comments about the statements, there's two statements in this case by Lisa Shelton.

Oral argument — Solomon v. Center for Comprehensive Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2022

So I believe that the court aired in and simply striking and there's very little analysis of that. The court, you're right. The court did acknowledge that. … And again, as was pointed out by my predecessor, prescribing Depakote in and of itself was not a wrongful act.

Oral argument — MPG West, LLC v. Secretary of Defense

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2024

Here, you know, in a requirements-type contract, the limitations broadly are that the government has to act in good faith, but specifically, you know, they have to act in a way that does not avoid their … your client is negotiating and saying, boy, I'm telling you, with no transportation subsidy, if I have to transport all this stuff in the United States, including stuff like salad, which I might have to air

Oral argument — People v. Slover

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2011

The judge now has a hearing and makes findings based on the evidence and decides whether or not there's been a substantial violation of constitutional rights, as I think the Post-Conviction Hearing Act … They made a lot of headway with this unknown print, even though, you know, it was up in the air as to when it was put there because they had the crime scene technician who said two hours before Sieferman

Oral argument — United States v. Gazda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

I think – I mean, obviously, under the Crime Victims Act, it should have gone to the Crime Finance. There's, to me, at least no question about that. … I guess it's just up to the government to act upon that ruling? Well, we do have the distinguishing feature here that my client has not paid the money.

Oral argument — United States v. Luke Brugnara

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2017

Brugnara's mental illness did not comment on sentencing. Mr. Brugnara was not evaluated with proper testing by an expert until after he was convicted and trialed. … You're saying that because he was acting as his own counsel or just because as a defendant, he wasn't capable of being tried because he was insane? Is that what your point is?

Oral argument — United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2013

Your Honor, the District Court aired when it held that Mr. … And then the Arizona courts commented upon the commentary to the statute. So it did not actually decide – it did not apply the use of force definition. Okay.

Oral argument — Flores v. FS Blinds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

And having bet wrong, you know, the Fair Labor Standards Act is a fairly technical statute, and by design the definition of employee is intended to be as broad as any federal statute that there is. … Once I got back to the plant, I would do some paperwork, clean the truck, load it for the next day. I worked Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and a shorter route on Saturday.

Oral argument — State of Alaska v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2015

And to the extent that the merits are intertwined with the jurisdiction this court held in safe air for everyone, that's a permissible determination that the court can take up the merits where they're … For example, the parties had shown substantial and continuous use over a period of five years.

Oral argument — Jacobs v. Yellow Cab Affiliation, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2016

So the comments are important. The comments, I thought, are what direct you to the instructions that the Childhood used in this case. … We've already commented on that. The problem here is this is a distinction with no meaning under the law.

Oral argument — Construction and General Labor v. Town of Grand Chute

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018

Well, the ordinance defines inflatable sign to be any sign constructed of fabric or other flexible material that takes on a three-dimensional shape when filled with air. … It says, I suppose speaking of the ones in the community center sign district, inflatable signs require a permit, period. I don't see any criteria for the permit other than five days.

Oral argument — United States v. Francisco Arias

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2019

I'm just looking at prongs three and four of the plain air test, and so I'll tell you my problems. … If you look at the four groups, the first group, the first period of time, 2010 to 11, is Norman Concepcion.

Oral argument — Harris v. Adame

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2014

Well, because Arthur conveyed as fee simple absolute under the Conveyances Act, and that's the key, because the Conveyances Act provides that when you convey by warranty deed, it's fee simple absolute, … The probate act is really clear that as far as Arnold's concerned, Arnold had no capacity to execute the deed. That's clear under the probate act.

Oral argument — United States v. Mark Neel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2010

You're still sort of up in the air. And this might be a good case to discuss that. I don't know. Or make that decision. … Counsel made a comment that he thought it wasn't clear whether or not Judge Burns just didn't want to take the plea.