Documents

Oral argument — Charles v. Seinfeld

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2020

And as this court has held and noted in cases, and then the district courts in reliance on this court's authority, the limitations period isn't some technical bar or some mechanical rule. … And then as Judge Walker and Judge Lynch noted, there's no question on the allegations of complaint that not only was there a dispute in 2012 before the show aired about ownership, but Mr.

Oral argument — terrell v. contra costa cty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2006

It wasn't just isolated comment here or isolated comment there. We tried to break down the periods of time and the locations where she was. It was four different stations, too. That's significant. … In Morgan, the United States Supreme Court said as long as you have one act within the period of time, you can consider the entire period of time for purposes of liability.

Oral argument — United States v. Turner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2024

And Maldonado, I mentioned and blout I mentioned in part because those air cases where officers actually saw people come out and those people said nobody's there. … And the magistrate judge here had an opportunity to see Detective Soto testify and be examined and found that he did not act with reckless disregard. He acted carefully and preparing the warrants.

Oral argument — AAA Group Contractors v. Alkilani

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2024

I wanna point out something in the response brief that counsel filed and he cited to Air Room and he cited to specifically Air Room's criticism of Bonanza in arguing that just because there's bad notice … Swise acted diligently once he was retained. But Mr. Al-Khulani was not acting diligently from May 25 when he was informed of the conflict.

Oral argument — United States v. Currie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018

Currie's defense, his only defense, that he acted in a heat of passion. … We've got to, you know, you have to show prejudice, you know, the third and fourth prongs of plain air. Sure.

Oral argument — United States v. Federal Resources Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

The only evidence in the record is from their own lawyer repeatedly acting on behalf of Funnel and Major. So you made this argument to the district court? Yes, Your Honor, we did. Okay. Thank you. … It's undisputed that Coeur d'Alene's owned the site for an extended period of time, but it wasn't the operator of the site for much, if any, of that time.

Oral argument — Gores v. Charles Schwarb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2007

If we were riding on a clean slate, I mean, the argument makes a great deal of sense, intuitively, logically, every other way. … I mean, if they get an injunction, if it says your records were wrong in 1999 or whenever it was, go fix it, period.

Oral argument — Stearns v. Stearns

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2011

This matter arose as a petition for educational expenses under Section 513 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. … This is a clean record as far as that goes. And the facts are not in dispute.

Oral argument — DeAngelo Thomas-El v. Nicole Francis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2023

Atkinson is a better case for that, where you have extreme conditions where the mattress is moldy and filthy and the inmate can't get clean. … Um, so I was appointed pursuant to the CJA, uh, Act, um, on the 1983. I understand that. So there's no, no discovery was done whatsoever.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Chez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2013

Clean it up, do whatever they want to do with it, and they sell it. So this is not a surprise. It should not have been a surprise to Mr. … And as to their comment that the IMDMA displaced that law, it would have displaced it had the parties elected to follow the IMDMA.

Oral argument — Universal Settelements v. Natl Viatical Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2014

That was one of the acts of gamesmanship that occurred here. … Now, we went through the additional step of getting a clean $5 million judgment, but there's no dispute that there was a default. There's no dispute that the notice was given.

Oral argument — Dixon v. Maggart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2013

And it was a very clean trial. The plaintiff's counsel has not argued that there were any errors in the trial itself. … Even assuming plaintiff acted in a legal manner, a jury could still find that she was contributory negligent.

Oral argument — Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2015

There was air mail. There were means of shipping things abroad at that time. … We never said, of course, the 1942 Act reached anything.

Oral argument — United States v. Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2008

There might have been other evidence that she acts in her own self-interest. There might have been other evidence that her demeanor was off. … But it was certainly not speculation for me, just out of thin air, to think that there was something influencing her testimony.

Oral argument — Southwest Airlines v. TSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2026

It's very similar to what happened in the Turkey Hull bankruptcy case that the Supreme Court decided, where they looked at a provision on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act that specifically said something … And second of all, I want to just point to the July 11, 2017 email exchange that TSA relies on here, because that email exchange, which by the way comes after the first audit period is over and into the

Oral argument — United States v. Ademola Adebayo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2021

Um, what about I understood that the government introduced some evidence that this activity was taking place in sort of open air, open site in the pharmacy in the back. … Adebayo was identified as a pharmacist that was acting in the front of this pharmacy, and the pharmacist that was acting in the back was actually Mr. Young, and that was testified to by Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Tanganica Corbett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

It does seem to me that this is an issue where you have to establish plain air, but it appears to me that you have. I'm having more trouble, though, at least for me. … I think the court's use of Bailey is instructive here, because it's that act of employment or the conversion of the thing.

Oral argument — Gilberto DeJesus v. Sergeant Willie J. Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2021

And so, I think we just need to clean that up going forward, don't you? … That's an Eighth Amendment violation, period, right? The second the legitimate purpose ends, so I guess that would be my answer.

Oral argument — Samuel Ballengee v. CBS Broadcasting, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020

And the third was that Ballengee intentionally acted illegally, acted immorally, and or contributed to this opioid crisis for profit. … But, you know, I cleaned up my act and in 2015, in 2016, I was running things differently. The fact is that that is not supported by the record either. As recently as November of 2015, Mr.

Oral argument — Jon Sanchez v. Robert Elizondo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

So he was not just willy-nilly pulling something out of thin air. He was interpreting the rules and what the rules allowed him to do. … rules and asked for comments, and then he construed the rules and his ability to proceed with just one arbitrator.