Documents

Oral argument — Jackson Park Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015

Justice Hoffman, since that 16-inch clincher is still hanging in the air, I will feel free to grab my bat and try to whack it out. Can I ask you a question that goes along with that? Sure. … Because the way this Workers' Compensation Act works is petitioners are afforded one opportunity to prove their permanency, to prove their disability.

Oral argument — Stanley Penley v. McDowell County Board of Ed.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2017

So five years, a lapse of five years between the act that you say gave rise to the suspension and the actual suspension, that's quite a period of time. … And the time period between the inappropriate comments and the suspension and the investigation was, in contrast to the time period between the political activity, amazingly short.

Oral argument — In Re Americas Insurance Center Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

And I thought that levy didn't maintain in SEPA Act 2, paragraph 6, that there were any T&E expenses. … So that's not insignificant that over a period of a few years, it's already winding down. This is not like life insurance. This is...

Oral argument — United States v. Ricky Fackrell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2020

And the Supreme Court in Boyd found nothing objectionable with those comments. … But the defense in a car certainly did object to the prosecutor's comments, and that did not occur here.

Oral argument — United States v. Gazda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

I think – I mean, obviously, under the Crime Victims Act, it should have gone to the Crime Finance. There's, to me, at least no question about that. … I guess it's just up to the government to act upon that ruling? Well, we do have the distinguishing feature here that my client has not paid the money.

Oral argument — State of Alaska v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2015

And to the extent that the merits are intertwined with the jurisdiction this court held in safe air for everyone, that's a permissible determination that the court can take up the merits where they're … For example, the parties had shown substantial and continuous use over a period of five years.

Oral argument — United States v. Mark Neel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2010

You're still sort of up in the air. And this might be a good case to discuss that. I don't know. Or make that decision. … Counsel made a comment that he thought it wasn't clear whether or not Judge Burns just didn't want to take the plea.

Oral argument — United States v. Swan

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

It was going to Spring Act, Turnbull, Marks, money coming back to them. … This Court has reviewed the Spring Act conspiracy on a number of occasions, and I'm urging the Court to find, just as it did with Mr.

Oral argument — Susan Long v. IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2010

Really, I think that although it might take on a certain air of locking a pair of scorpions in a bottle, it really wouldn't be a bad idea to start over. … But in general, it's clear that statistical reports of this nature are subject to the Freedom of Information Act. I'm not disagreeing with that.

Oral argument — J.L. v. Mercer Island School

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2008

There is now, I shouldn't say a statute of limitations, there was a three-year limitation period. There is now in the Federal Act, a two-year limitations period, but this case predated that. … They just kicked this out of the air and said, oh, we're going to just even things out and it will knock off six months of the program. I think what- Oh, you're talking about the reduction? Yeah.

Oral argument — SEC v. Yuen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2008

Yuen acted intentionally and not merely recklessly with respect to each of these eight frauds. … The district court acted well within its discretion in setting the penalty.

Oral argument — Illinois Casualty Co. v. Wellington Homes, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015

The acts or omissions are missing. … Isn't it disingenuous to suggest that this comment about a claim being potentially within the policy is a holding when it's really we were setting out what the facts of the case were?

Oral argument — United States v. Grigg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2007

We balance the nature of the governmental intrusion, which, while it's not an arrest, a terrorist act is still a significant intrusion. … were improper and prejudicial and that's the purpose of the plein air review and in this case the comments although we're not arguing that they were justified or proper don't rise to the level of infecting

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Clemans

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020

If she agrees, I'm going to clean up his language to sex during my next visit. I want to have a photo session with us together having sex for my collection. … Well, there were both – there were both his acts and his statements. First, his acts. He moved to Thailand.

Oral argument — Theus v. Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2007

And that is an old test, that that should not have been used, because that was pre-1994, prior to the amendment of the Whistleblowers Act. … Not that the Bible is not important, but they were supposed to train her during this period of time. In particular, in the rebuttal time, do you want to state that? Yes, Your Honor. Thank you. Mr.

Oral argument — Menther Muhamd v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2020

So there was not a clean bill of health on credibility, and then noted a real shift in demeanor. … So I appreciate your comments on that. Certainly, Your Honor. First of all, as we argued in our brief, it doesn't form a specific and cogent basis to find Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Alejandro Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2015

On page 131, the court starts off the discussion by addressing the defendant, informing him he's going to be sentenced under the Sentencing Reform Act. … I don't think the court's going to do this, so I'm just going to make my arguments and sort of keep this clean and not into a sort of cat fight.

Oral argument — United States v. Hemza Lefsih

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2017

The other thing is, and the other reason is, making objections to the actual judge who is presiding over his very own behavior is obviously openly confronting the judge, and it's a hostile act. … So, in review of the cases in this circuit using the plain air standard, one of the things that is analyzed is whether there was compelling and overwhelming evidence against the defendant.

Oral argument — People v. Peterson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2016

And perhaps there's no other case that is in this posture, given this very short period of time that we're talking about. … He has invented, out of thin air, this notion that the state has to specify what testimony it is acting to prevent, that defendant is acting to prevent.

Oral argument — Intellistop Inc. v. DOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2023

So, and this idea about a malfunction with respect to Intellistop comes out of thin air. I mean, it's not referenced anywhere. The representation is at work. … And that evidence, I would add, Your Honor, that's the Tankstar comment. The Tankstar comment is addressed in the decision.