Documents

Oral argument — Harward v. City of Austin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2023

So, you're saying annexation period is synonymous with tax, no matter who challenges an annexation and it's a tax case? … But what if you have a case that it's about annexation, period? I mean, that's what this case is about.

Oral argument — Michael Elliott v. BNSF Railway Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

And, and again, I mean, the jury heard the Court say several times, both in excluding the transcripts and, and, and these other comments that it made that, well, we're, he's going to conflate the two. … This is different from Title VII, the Air 21 statutes, the FMLA, and ERISA, where reinstatement is explicitly denoted under the statutory language as equitable.

Oral argument — Jane Doe v. City of Detroit MI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2021

Doe the day after her story aired on the local news. … Hughley at Doe after this, you threw me under the bus comment. And it ignored the temporal proximity between Ms. Doe's protected activity, which continued through into July 2017.

Oral argument — Service Employees International Union v. ILRB, Local Panel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

It makes sense that the General Assembly did not pull this very peculiar phrase out of thin air. It pulled it from Nacolni. And therefore, it should be interpreted in accordance with Nacolni. … It used it in other provisions, other sections of the Act.

Oral argument — Weichsel v. JP Morgan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

That's all in Comment 9E2. In addition, it can be provided on and combined with a periodic statement. That's both the regulation, 1026.9E2, and Comment 9 – this gets really confusing here. … There is a Comment 9E with numbers after it. There is also a Comment 9E in parentheses, 2 in parentheses, and then numbers after it. So I'm referring to Comment 9E2-1 and 2.

Oral argument — United States v. Joseph Haycock

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2015

Basically, you've got your client, he's over 18, check with the federal statute, and acting to gratify sexual desire of himself or a third party. That's also a sexual act, correct? Correct. … We're not just pulling this out of thin air.

Oral argument — Moreau v. Harris County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2026

This case presents a straightforward application of the Fair Labor Standards Act's exemptions for executive and administrative employees. … They're not coming to the court with clean hands. And lastly, I'll say, I can conceive of a situation, to your point, where someone can be simultaneously exempt.

Oral argument — Abelardo Saucedo v. Farmland Management Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

In that case, the Clean Water Act, you don't look to lenity because the criminal provisions of that statute were not at issue. I don't see how you could tease them out quite so easily. … So they only get damages for one year period. That's correct. The reason there should be separate damages for each year are two fold.

Oral argument — O'Brien v. O'Brien

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2018

It's based upon the Partnership Act. But here's the important part. … Just by cleaning it, just by arguing 701, does not make it so. Now, you can agree that there's a partnership. That's imputed in fact.

Oral argument — TOTOLO/KING JOINT VENTURE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2011

The court didn't count the last day of the period was a weekend, and it was filed the following workday, and we believe she miscalculated it, and that's in our brief. Where is all this? … The issue wasn't raised in the briefing and I'm responding to the comments today.

Oral argument — People v. Campbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

So he's commenting upon how this guy responds when first being accused of this particular act, and that's appropriate. I mean, the jury saw how he reacted. He didn't say any of those things. … And these comments were invited by the defense counsel.

Oral argument — People v. Robinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2025

If we make a clean record and say, Hey, the issue that's here that I can't even go forward on is the cause aspect. Okay. And the reason why is X, Y, and Z. … He only commented on that when the court specifically identified that the state had raised this defense, that no cause had been met.

Oral argument — People v. Slover

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2011

The judge now has a hearing and makes findings based on the evidence and decides whether or not there's been a substantial violation of constitutional rights, as I think the Post-Conviction Hearing Act … They made a lot of headway with this unknown print, even though, you know, it was up in the air as to when it was put there because they had the crime scene technician who said two hours before Sieferman

Oral argument — Frederick Schiff v. The City and County of San Fra

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2013

Conduct – I mean, acts or omissions. Is conduct in the release? No, but the words acts or omissions are, which are analogous to conduct. All right. Well, what did the release release, then? … The plaintiff had been an acting lieutenant, and the other fellow, Ali, had never been an acting lieutenant.

Oral argument — Dixon v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2023

When the lower court discussed the informal claim doctrine, the lower court first aired in its analysis of the Supreme Court decision in Kales. … How can the agency act on it if it no longer has authority under the statute of limitations to act?

Oral argument — Appalachian Power Company v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2024

You have to produce it over a period of time. … They could bring a complaint proceeding saying this contract is not just and reasonable and must be reformed under the Federal Power Act. That wasn't this proceeding.

Oral argument — United States v. Reggie Pettus

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2023

So I think that the court certainly couldn't have clearly aired. And I would say the same thing, Judge Boardman. … Pettis acted in self-defense.

Oral argument — Baldwin v. Ward Chrysler Center Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2026

We had filed it and asked to be heard upon it, and the time period to file an interlocutory appeal ran. … The plaintiffs did not address this issue in their response brief on appeal, and such first air goes unchallenged.

Oral argument — Miskill v. SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

And so whether or not they can be used by comparables might be up in the air. But we don't know any of that. But, see, the comparability is this. … It means they were negligent in their Douglas factors because there was a group of people all acting the same way. We have evidence of that now. You don't dispute it.

Oral argument — United States v. Thaddeus Beaulieu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

This wasn't your isolated prosecutorial error of the comment during closing, the improper question, or even multiple improper questions or comments. … How can this court not clean up this mess by ordering a new trial possibly before a different judge? Sure, your honor.