Documents

Oral argument — Dela Cruz v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2019

This is easier to see, Your Honor, if we look at the reply brief, in the addendum to the reply brief, there is a clean copy that makes it really easy to see. ADDM 040 attached to the gray brief. … There was not in Soria, but in Talon, and the court addressed the equal protection argument about generally Section 107, which is the rescission act, which this act follows up on.

Oral argument — Moreau v. Harris County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2026

This case presents a straightforward application of the Fair Labor Standards Act's exemptions for executive and administrative employees. … They're not coming to the court with clean hands. And lastly, I'll say, I can conceive of a situation, to your point, where someone can be simultaneously exempt.

Oral argument — Abelardo Saucedo v. Farmland Management Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

In that case, the Clean Water Act, you don't look to lenity because the criminal provisions of that statute were not at issue. I don't see how you could tease them out quite so easily. … So they only get damages for one year period. That's correct. The reason there should be separate damages for each year are two fold.

Oral argument — Baugh v. Secretaryofthe Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2012

After, it is important that this did not come, Rosker's decision did not come out of thin air. It came from the advisory opinion from B.B. Herman, who was down in Millington, Tennessee, at Bupers. … The BCNR acted, the Secretary of the Navy through Bernard Roster acted to remedy this error or injustice. What BCRAF did was simply, I see my time is up. Let me ask you this.

Oral argument — Gilberto DeJesus v. Sergeant Willie J. Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2021

And so, I think we just need to clean that up going forward, don't you? … That's an Eighth Amendment violation, period, right? The second the legitimate purpose ends, so I guess that would be my answer.

Oral argument — Samuel Ballengee v. CBS Broadcasting, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2020

And the third was that Ballengee intentionally acted illegally, acted immorally, and or contributed to this opioid crisis for profit. … But, you know, I cleaned up my act and in 2015, in 2016, I was running things differently. The fact is that that is not supported by the record either. As recently as November of 2015, Mr.

Oral argument — USA . SMITH-BALTIHER

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2004

I think the second is ---- Because if you get a new trial, you've got a clean slate, don't you? I agree. And I think the derivative citizen defense is probably Mr. Smith's strongest defense. … That persons not born in the United States acquire citizenship by birth only as provided by acts of Congress. That's Miller v. Albright. Okay. Only as provided by acts of Congress.

Oral argument — O'Brien v. O'Brien

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2018

It's based upon the Partnership Act. But here's the important part. … Just by cleaning it, just by arguing 701, does not make it so. Now, you can agree that there's a partnership. That's imputed in fact.

Oral argument — People v. Campbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014

So he's commenting upon how this guy responds when first being accused of this particular act, and that's appropriate. I mean, the jury saw how he reacted. He didn't say any of those things. … And these comments were invited by the defense counsel.

Oral argument — United States v. Kevin James Petroske

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2019

Petroski a fair trial in the first place came together to create the plein air, the extraordinary circumstances that would be a basis for the court granting relief in this case. … It would have been his ultimate goal to see them engage in sex acts.

Oral argument — Flexible Lifeline Systems, Inc v. Precision Lift, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2011

I would have to say I disagree with the comments of the Appellant's Counsel. The eBay and Winter cases said what they said. … But if you knew you had a different, if we said the evidence was different that the district court aired and we sent it back, would you put on the exactly same evidence or would you put other evidence

Oral argument — Rocky Mountain Peace & Justice Center v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2022

This case was brought under the Administrative Procedure Act, and under the State Farm Standard, if the agency overlooks a significant issue, then it's acted arbitrary and capriciously. … well, if I understand their argument, they are concerned that the very minor activities contemplated by this EAS will entrain, will kick up essentially dust, and that dust will entrain itself into the air

Oral argument — People v. Slover

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2011

The judge now has a hearing and makes findings based on the evidence and decides whether or not there's been a substantial violation of constitutional rights, as I think the Post-Conviction Hearing Act … They made a lot of headway with this unknown print, even though, you know, it was up in the air as to when it was put there because they had the crime scene technician who said two hours before Sieferman

Oral argument — Appalachian Power Company v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2024

You have to produce it over a period of time. … They could bring a complaint proceeding saying this contract is not just and reasonable and must be reformed under the Federal Power Act. That wasn't this proceeding.

Oral argument — State of Washington v. U.S. Dept. of State

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2021

But that was filed, just a second, those 933 were filed during the notice and comment period? Yes. There was also a bunch that was filed after the notice and comment period. That is true. … I mean, do you agree with that number, that there were 900 comments that addressed 3D printing that were filed during the notice and comment period?

Oral argument — Berkeley County School Dist. v. HUB International Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2019

Under the Atkins decision, the party moving to compel arbitration has the burden, period. Not the district. … If a judge or a jury decides facts, we have to accept them or we give them clear air review or whatever they're standards for. But just that you stand up in court and say something.

Oral argument — Francine Shulman v. Todd Kaplan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

believe that the unclean hands, that they're coming to court with unclean hands, says that if they want to get profits out of an illegal business operation and use racketeering, they should be coming with clean … It just doesn't make any sense to me, unless you can convince me otherwise, that RICO, when they used the words business or property, intended to include what they then considered in that time period a

Oral argument — Bryant v. The Lakelands Community Homeowners Association, Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2011

In the Cablefish case, the statute that was at issue was the Service Animal Act and whether or not a child could use a service dog in a school. … So I don't pretend to put on air. At this point, I don't foresee me having any additional testimony or witnesses than I've already got. And briefly, I'll finish up. Mr.

Oral argument — Milliken v. Bank of America, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2025

The CARD Act doesn't give, certainly consumers would prefer that the rate goes down immediately. But the CARD Act only is concerned with increases. … You couldn't just go pick a number out of the air.

Oral argument — Trump, President of United States v. Slaughter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2025

And on top of that, we have a lot of agencies over a long period of time engaging in all manner of civil enforcement of federal statutes. … There's, you know, just picking something out of thin air. What is the theory?